Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 11:1 (2016) ► pp.1–25

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed

 | University of Antwerp
 | University of Antwerp
 | University of Antwerp
Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.1.01ver
We investigated whether the effect of Homophone Dominance that has been reported for spelling errors on Dutch verb homophones (Sandra, Frisson, & Daems, 1999) also occurs in perception. This effect was indeed observed: participants in a proofreading experiment overlooked more homophone intrusions when the intruder was more dominant than the target form, irrespective of the inflectional ending. Participant groups whose grammatical awareness was better developed made fewer errors but also showed the effect of Homophone Dominance. The findings are explained in terms of a Computational and Similarity-Based Race model, in which a conscious and slow computational process in working memory, implementing the spelling rule, competes with an automatic and fast, frequency-sensitive process of lexical access. The presence of the effect in both spelling and reading explains why these errors on descriptively simple verb forms in Dutch are so persistent.
References (29)
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daelemans, W., & Van den Bosch, A. (2005). Memory-based language processing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkhuizen, E. (2016). Het effect van homofoondominantie op het leesgedrag van lexical en sublexicale homofoonintrusies. (The effect of homophone dominance on the reading of lexical and sublexical homophone intrusions) Unpublished Master’s thesis, Antwerp University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42(5), 873–903. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Mak, W.M. (2005). Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory and Cognition, 33(7), 1160–1173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54(4), 283–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krott, A., Baayen, R.H., & Schreuder, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39(1), 51–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Largy, P., Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P. (1996). The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 111, 217–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P.A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, S.F., Brysbaert, M. & Rastle, K. (2009). Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(9), 1706–1715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandra, D. (2010). Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: Spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms. Language and speech, 53(3), 405–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (in preparation). Spellingfouten tegen de werkwoordvormen verklaard: de frequentieverdeling van Nederlandse werkwoordvormen over homofone en niet-homofone vormen. ( Explaining spelling errors on verb forms: the frequency distribution of Dutch verb forms over homophonous and non-homophonous forms ).
Sandra, D., & Fayol, M. (2003). Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 151. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F. (1999). Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and language, 681, 277–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, B., Sandra, D., & Daelemans, W. (2013). Selective impairment of adjective order constraints as overeager abstraction: An elaboration on Kemmerer et al. (2009). Journal of neurolinguistics, 26(1), 46–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R., & Nobels, J. (2010). Code eclecticism: Linguistic variation and code alternation in the chat language of Flemish teenagers. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 141, 657–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhaert, N. (2016). Rules or regularities? The homophone dominance effect in spelling and reading regular Dutch verb forms. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Antwerp University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhaert, N., & Sandra, D. (in preparation). The effect of homophone dominance plagues readers as well as spellers: Homophone intrusions on Dutch regular verb forms in speeded reading tasks.
Verhaert, N., Vandekerckhove, B., Daelemans, W., & Sandra, D. (submitted). Homophone Dominance and neighbor effects when spelling Dutch verb inflections.
White, K.K., Abrams, L., & Zoller, S.M. (2013). Perception-production asymmetries in homophone spelling: the unique influence of aging. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(5), 681–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, K.K., Abrams, L., Zoller, S.M., & Gibson, S.M. (2008). Why did I right that? Factors that influence the production of homophonous substitution errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 611, 977–985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Tijn Schmitz & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
2025. Silent morphological information in a word’s spelling also affects natural reading behavior. Morphology 35:3 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek, Dorit Ravid & Ingo Plag
2024. The orthographic representation of a word’s morphological structure: beneficial and detrimental effect for spellers. Morphology 34:2 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek
2022. Too Little Morphology Can Kill You: The Interplay Between Low-Frequency Morpho-Orthographic Rules and High-Frequency Verb Homophones in Spelling Errors. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Dominiek Sandra & Reinhild Vandekerckhove
2022. Adolescents and Verb Spelling: The Impact of Gender and Educational Track on Rule Knowledge and Linguistic Attitudes. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Dominiek Sandra & Reinhild Vandekerckhove
2024. When correct spelling hardly matters: Teenagers’ production and perception of spelling error corrections in Dutch social media writing. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Anna M. T. Bosman & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
2021. The role of grammar in spelling homophonous regular verbs. Written Language & Literacy 24:1 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Hubers, Ferdy, Thijs Trompenaars, Sebastian Collin, Kees De Schepper & Helen De Hoop
2020. Hypercorrection as a By-product of Education. Applied Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 552 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
2020. From experiment to real-life data. The Mental Lexicon 15:3 ► pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
2021. The impact of analogical effects and social factors on the spelling of partially homophonous verb forms in informal social media writing. Written Language & Literacy 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Weth, Constanze
2020. Distinguishing Syntactic Markers From Morphological Markers. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Schmitz, Tijn, Robert Chamalaun & Mirjam Ernestus
2018. The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media. Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Zuidema, Johan & Anneke Neijt
2017. The BasisSpellingBank. Written Language & Literacy 20:1 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue