Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:3 (2015) ► pp.313–338

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Context and paradigms

Two patterns of probabilistic pronunciation variation in Russian agreement suffixes

Published online: 15 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.3.01coh
A small but growing body of research on English and Dutch has found that pronunciation of affixes in a word form is sensitive to paradigmatic probability – i.e., the probability of using that form over other words in the same morphological paradigm. Yet it remains unclear (a) how paradigmatic probability is best measured; (b) whether an increase in paradigmatic probability leads to phonetic enhancement or reduction; and (c) by what mechanism paradigmatic probability can affect pronunciation. The current work examines pronunciation variation of Russian verbal agreement suffixes. I show that there are two distinct patterns of variation, corresponding to two different measures of paradigmatic probability. One measure, pairwise paradigmatic probability, is associated with a pronunciation pattern that resembles phonetic enhancement. The second measure, lexeme paradigmatic probability, can show enhancement effects, but can also yield reduction effects more similar to those of contextual probability. I propose that these two patterns can be explained in an exemplar model of lexical storage. Reduction effects are the consequence of faster retrieval and encoding of an articulatory target, while effects that resemble enhancement result when the pronunciation target of both members of a pair of competing word forms is shifted towards the more frequent of two.
References (37)
Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-­based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 231, 275–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1191, 3048–3058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A., Brenier, J.M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 601, 92–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M., & Gildea, D. (2003). Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1001–1024. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.1, retrieved 31 January 2009 from [URL].
Bürki, A., Ernestus, M., Gendrot., C., Fougeron, C., & Frauenfelder, U. (2011). What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: A corpus analysis of French connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(6), 3980–3991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, C. (2014). Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement. Morphology, 24(4), 291–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (1983). Hierarchies, targets, and controllers: Agreement patterns in Slavic. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M., & Johnson, K. (2009). Vowel discrimination by English, French and Turkish Speakers: Evidence for an exemplar-based approach to speech perception. Phonetica, 661, 222–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregory, M.L., Raymond, W.D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., & Jurafsky, D. (2000). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 35) (pp. 151–166). Chicago, IL.
Goldinger, S. (1998). Echoes of Echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 51–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanique, I., & Ernestus, M. (2011). Final /t/ reduction in Dutch past-participles: The role of word predictability and morphological decomposability. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2011) (pp. 2849–2852). Florence, Italy.
. (2012). The role of morphology in acoustic reduction. Lingue e linguaggio, 11(2), 147–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanique, I., Schuppler, B., & Ernestus, M. (2010). Morphological and predictability effects on schwa reduction: The case of Dutch word-initial syllables. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference of the international speech communication association (Interspeech 2010) (pp. 933–936). Makuhari, Japan.
Hay, J. (2003). Causes and consequences of word structure. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Baayen, H. (2002). Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001 (pp. 203–235). Netherlands: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In M. J. Sole, P. Beddor, & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology. In honor of John Ohala (pp. 25–40). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W.D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological studies in language 45) (pp. 229–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H. (2007). Morphological predictability and acoustic salience of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1211, 2261–2271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuvšinskaja, J.M. (2012). Soglasovanie skazujemogo s podležaščim, vyražennym sčetnym obo­rotom. Problemy russkoj stilistiki po dannym NKRJ. Online at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6(3), 172–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 941, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padgett, J., & Tabain, M. (2005). Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica, 62(1), 14–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H. (2005). Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica, 621, 146–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL].
Schuppler, B., van Dommelen, W.A., Koreman, J., & Ernestus, M. (2012). How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level. Journal of Phonetics, 401, 595–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tily, H., & Kuperman, V. (2012). Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 132(6), 3935–3940. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Son, R., & Pols, L.C.W. (2003). How efficient is speech? Proceedings of the institute of phonetic sciences, 25 (pp. 171–184). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Son, R.J.J.H., Bolotova, O., Lennes, M., & Pols, L.C.W. (2004). Frequency effects on vowel reduction in three typological different languages (Dutch, Finnish, Russian). In Proceedings of the 8th International conference on spoken language processing (Interspeech 2004) (pp. 1277–1280). Jeju Island, South Korea.
Walsh, M., Möbius, B., Wade, T., & Schütze, H. (2010). Multilevel exemplar theory. Cognitivie Science, 341, 537–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Hashimoto, Daiki
2023. The effect of verbal conjugation predictability on speech signal. Morphology 33:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Lõo, Kaidi, Fabian Tomaschek, Pärtel Lippus & Benjamin V. Tucker
2023. Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Effects in Estonian Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech 66:2 ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Tucker, Benjamin V. & Yoichi Mukai
2023. Spontaneous Speech, DOI logo
Tomaschek, Fabian & Michael Ramscar
2022. Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty—Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Bell, Melanie J., Sonia Ben Hedia & Ingo Plag
2021. How morphological structure affects phonetic realisation in English compound nouns. Morphology 31:2 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Stein, Simon David & Ingo Plag
2021. Morpho-Phonetic Effects in Speech Production: Modeling the Acoustic Duration of English Derived Words With Linear Discriminative Learning. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
TOMASCHEK, FABIAN, INGO PLAG, MIRJAM ERNESTUS & R. HARALD BAAYEN
2021. Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Tomaschek, Fabian, Benjamin V. Tucker, Michael Ramscar & R. Harald Baayen
2021. Paradigmatic enhancement of stem vowels in regular English inflected verb forms. Morphology 31:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Zee, Tim, Louis ten Bosch, Ingo Plag & Mirjam Ernestus
2021. Paradigmatic Relations Interact During the Production of Complex Words: Evidence From Variable Plurals in Dutch. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words, DOI logo
Luef, Eva Maria & Jong-Seung Sun
2020. Wordform-specific frequency effects cause acoustic variation in zero-inflected homophones. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 711 ff. DOI logo
Plag, Ingo, Arne Lohmann, Sonia Ben Hedia & Julia Zimmermann
2020. An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous. In Complex Words, ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Cohen, Clara & Shinae Kang
2018. Flexible perceptual sensitivity to acoustic and distributional cues. The Mental Lexicon 13:1 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Kevin & Ryan Bennett
2018. Contextual predictability influences word and morpheme duration in a morphologically complex language (Kaqchikel Mayan). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144:2 ► pp. 997 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue