Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:1 (2015) ► pp.53–87

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Morphology constrains native and non-native word formation in different ways

Evidence from plurals inside compounds

 | Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM) / University of Potsdam
 | Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM) / University of Potsdam
 | Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM) / University of Potsdam
 | Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM) / University of Potsdam
Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.1.03cla
The role of morphological and syntactic information in non-native second language (L2) comprehension is controversial. Some have argued that late bilinguals rapidly integrate grammatical cues with other information sources during reading or listening in the same way as native speakers. Others claim that structural cues are underused in L2 processing. We examined different kinds of modifiers inside compounds (e.g. singulars vs. plurals, *rat eater vs. rats eater) with respect to this controversy, which are subject to both structural and non-structural constraints. Two offline and two online (eye-movement) experiments were performed examining the role of these constraints in spoken language comprehension of English and German, testing 77 advanced L2 learners. We also compared the L2 groups to corresponding groups of native speakers. Our results suggest that despite native-like sensitivity to the compounding constraints, late bilinguals rely more on non-structural constraints and are less able to revise their initial interpretations than L1 comprehenders.
References (58)
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1996). Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition, 601, 65–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J.M., Rowland, C.F., & Young, C.R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 1061, 87–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banga, A., Hanssen, E., Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Plurals as modifiers in Dutch and English noun-noun compounds express plurality in production. The Mental Lexicon, 81, 53–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-0).
Binder, K., Duffy S., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 441, 297–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1988). On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988 (pp. 45–66). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck-Gengler, C., Menn, L., & Healy, A. (2004). What “mice trap” tells us about the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 901, 453–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 161–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1995). German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage (pp. 123–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M. (2001). Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua, 1111, 729–757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 271, 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 564–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Bartke, S., & Wiese, R. (1996). Compounding and inflection in German child language. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (pp. 115–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H. (2007). The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 1041, 476–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dell, G., Burger, L.K., & Svec, W.R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 1041, 123–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 331, 571–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H. (2012). The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 67–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A.L., & Marchman, V.A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernandez, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Online methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P (2006). Synthetic compounding in the English interlanguage of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 31, 231–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1985). Level ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 211, 73–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.H. (1966). Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Tunstall, S. (2002). Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 461, 267–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haskell, T.R., MacDonald, M.C., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2003). Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 119–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlexDB – Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 621, 10–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (in press). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Jaensch, C., Heyer, V., Gordon, P., & Clahsen, H. (2014). What plurals and compounds reveal about constraints in word formation. Language Acquisition, 211, 319–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (part 1). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1995a). L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 111, 20–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b). ‘Differential’ treatment of regular vs. irregular inflection in compounds as nonevidence for level-ordering. Second Language Research, 111, 267–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 381–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1995). L2 learners treat regular and irregular inflection differently in compounding. Second Language Research, 111, 88–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J.A., & Magnuson, J.S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 475–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, V. (2000). Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning, 501, 153–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, V.A., & Hayes, J. (2010). Processing English compounds in the first and second language: The influence of the middle morpheme. Language Learning, 601, 194–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oetting, J.B., & Rice, M.L. (1993). Plural acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 361, 1236–1248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (URL [URL]).
Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2010). Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 621, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 321, 299–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabourin, L.L., & Haverkort, M. (2003). Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R.J. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 175–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., MacDonald, M.C., & Haskell, T.R. (2007). Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon, 21, 287–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kim, J.J., Pinker, S., & Collins, C. (2005). The plurals-in-compounds effect. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Barnard College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva R., Gerth, S., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Morphological constraints in children’s spoken language comprehension: A visual world study of plurals inside compounds in English. Cognition, 1291, 457–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M.J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 451, 447–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G. (2001). Sentence Comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J.C. (2008). Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2010). Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 64–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J., & Christian, V. (2000). Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: A grammar-specific versus input-processing deficit? Cognition, 751, 33–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1996). Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 271, 183–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zukowski, A. (2005). Knowledge of constraints on compounding in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 481, 79–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Chung, Eun Seon & Jeong-Ah Shin
2023. Native and second language processing of quantifier scope ambiguity. Second Language Research 39:3 ► pp. 785 ff. DOI logo
Maeng, Junghwan
2023. Lexicon over Syntax: L2 Structural Processing of Chinese Separable Verbs. Languages 8:3 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Song, Yoonsang, Youngah Do, Arthur L. Thompson, Eileen R. Waegemaekers & Jongbong Lee
2020. SECOND LANGUAGE USERS EXHIBIT SHALLOW MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:5 ► pp. 1121 ff. DOI logo
Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser
2018. SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
FARHY, YAEL, JOÃO VERÍSSIMO & HARALD CLAHSEN
2018. Do late bilinguals access pure morphology during word recognition? A masked-priming study on Hebrew as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:5 ► pp. 945 ff. DOI logo
Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova
2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming . . . eventually. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5 ► pp. 1112 ff. DOI logo
Jessen, Anna, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen
2018. Variability and consistency in late bilinguals’ morphology. The Mental Lexicon 13:2 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
VERÍSSIMO, JOÃO
2016. Extending a Gradient Symbolic approach to the native versus non-native contrast: The case of plurals in compounds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:5 ► pp. 900 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue