Article published In: Semantics and Psychology of Complex Words
Edited by Christina L. Gagné and Thomas L. Spalding
[The Mental Lexicon 15:1] 2020
► pp. 42–61
Constituent polysemy and interpretational diversity in attested English novel compounds
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 30 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00013.sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00013.sch
Abstract
We explore variation in the interpretation of attested novel compound nouns in English, especially the contribution of constituent polysemy to this diversity. Our results show that effects of polysemy are pervasive in compound interpretation, contributing both to interpretational diversity and to perceived difficulty of interpretation. The higher the uncertainty about the concept represented by the head noun, based on existing compounds with that head, the greater the diversity of interpretations across speakers and the more difficult, on average, they find it to come up with a meaning.
Article outline
- Background
- Creating a database
- Materials
- Participants
- Procedure
- Study 1: How much diversity is there in the interpretation of attested novel compounds?
- Qualitative coding of free paraphrases
- Quantitative measures of interpretational diversity
- Results
- Study 2: What role does constituent polysemy play in the diversity of compound interpretation?
- Quantitative analysis
- Qualitative analysis
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (14)
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. & Zanchetta, E. (2009). The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3), 209–226.
Bell, M. J. (2011). At the boundary of morphology and syntax. Noun noun constructions in English. In A. Galani, G. Hicks, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.) Morphology and its Interfaces (pp. 137–168). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M. (2013). Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In Proceedings of IWCS 2013 Workshop Towards a Formal Distributional Semantics, (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition 19(4), 341–352.
(1993). Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Memory & Cognition 21(2), 235–246.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 591 pp. 97–130). Elsevier Inc.: Academic Press.
Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1–2), 8–25.
Maguire, P., E. Wisniewski, & G. Storms. (2010). A corpus study of semantic patterns in compounding. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1), 49–73.
Mullaly, A., Gagné, C., Spalding, T. L. & Marchak, K. (2010). Examining ambiguous adjectives in adjective-noun phrases: Evidence for representation as a shared core-meaning with sense specialization. The Mental Lexicon 51. 87–114.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. [URL]
Ryder, M. E. (1994). Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. University of California Press.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Chen, Phoebe, David Poeppel & Arianna Zuanazzi
Pugacheva, Vasilisa & Fritz Günther
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.