Cover not available

In:Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 341–356

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Language happens

 | University of CaliforniaMerced
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.18spi
Abstract
This chapter provides a brief tour through the history of psycholinguistics with a running thread that follows the work of Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. and an evolution toward more ecologically valid approaches and interactive embodied perspectives on how language works. Rather than treating language as though it were a static object with parts that invite removing and analyzing, contemporary psycholinguists and cognitive scientists are treating language more like an event that happens over time. This shift in perspective requires different types of theory formation, different types of experimental methods and different types of statistical analyses. As this paradigm shift progresses, more of the field may begin to see language not as a set of rules that a human brain contains inside itself but instead as an activity that people engage in together. The Gibbsian research program has played an important role in this evolution of the field.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A solitary language processor is not what processes language
  • A solitary brain is not what processes language
  • A solitary person is not what processes language
  • A community of people is what processes language
  • References
References (84)
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B. K., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733–764. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, C., and Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In S. Small, G. Cottrell, and M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution. pp.477–507. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2015). Language change. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), 687–696.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(2), 55–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Columbia University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event- related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 958–968. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 43–95). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2018). “How do humans make sense?” multiscale dynamics and emergent meaning. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 61–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). A piece of the action: modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 301–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B. J., Spevack, S. C., and Spivey, M. J. (2018). Interactionism in language: From neural networks to bodies to dyads. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falandays, J. B. & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 175–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(32), 12203–12208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science, 23(8), 931–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gennari, S. P., MacDonald, M. C., Postle, B. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2007). Context- dependent interpretation of words: Evidence for interactive neural processes. Neuroimage, 35(3), 1278–1286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8(2), 149–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 347–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Ström, L. & Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1997). Conceptual metaphors in mental imagery for proverbs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 83–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Adaptive cognition without massive modularity. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 149–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Pragmatic choice in conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 7–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gow Jr, D. W., & Olson, B. B. (2016). Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 841–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H., & Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. (1998). Vehicles, contents, conceptual structure, and externalism. Analysis, 58(1), 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 474–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Scaling laws in cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 223–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J. D. (2012). Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image- schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1): 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English, in N. Quinn and D. Holland (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Nuñéz, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1991). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99(4), 587–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masten, J., Stallybrass, P., & Vickers, N. J. (2016). Language machines: Technologies of literary and cultural production. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. (1993). Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance 14: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 655–688). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746–748. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2008). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onnis, L., & Spivey, M. J. (2012). Toward a new scientific visualization for the language sciences. Information, 3(1), 124–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013). Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2092–2102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. D. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 873–878). Mawhah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D., & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102(1), 129–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Spivey, M., & Cheung, J. (2001). Motor representations in memory and mental models. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp.839–844) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Barsalou, L., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp.845–850) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shebani, Z., & Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Moving the hands and feet specifically impairs working memory for arm-and leg-related action words. Cortex, 49(1), 222–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 305–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spevack, S. C., Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B. J., and Spivey, M. J. (2018). Interactivity of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, e12282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Fake news and false corroboration: Interactivity in rumor networks. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 3229–3234).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Who you are: The science of connectedness. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. & Richardson, D. (2009). Language processing embodied and embedded. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. (pp. 382–400). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J. & Spevack, S. C. (2017). An inclusive account of mind across spatiotemporal scales of cognition. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 1, 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. & Tanenhaus, M. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1521–1543.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645–659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2). MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 427–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. (2011). The embodied mind and the origins of human culture. In A. M. Abrantes & P. Hanenbarg (Eds.), Cognition and Culture: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. (pp. 13–27). Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 724–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 26(5), 979–1001. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue