Cover not available

In:Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 293–304

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

How to talk about motion without verbs

 | University of California, San DiegoCalifornia
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.15man
Abstract
Infants are fascinated by motion. There is abundant evidence that they are far more interested in motion than in static objects. This would lead us to expect that, in addition to nouns, motion verbs would figure prominently in their early vocabularies. But verbs are late, because they are complex and harder to learn than the names of objects. So infants find other ways to refer to motion. For example, they use prepositions such as up and down to refer to things moving up and down, and social terms such as hi and bye to coming in and going out. Infants talk about motion very early – just not with verbs. This article is dedicated to the memory of Ray Gibbs.
Article outline
  • Noun dominance in early language
  • The salience of motion in early cognition
  • Early words for motion other than verbs
    • Nouns
    • Prepositions and function words
  • Early meanings of up and down
    • Early meanings of hi and bye
    • Other early words for motion
  • Conclusions
  • References
References (43)
References
Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1999). 2.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 116–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arterberry, M. E., & Bornstein, M. H. (2001). Three-month-old infants’ categorization of animals and vehicles based on static and dynamic attributes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80 (4), 333–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Au, T. K. F., Dapretto, M., & Song, Y. K. (1994). Input vs constraints: Early word acquisition in Korean and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 567–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bahrick, L. E., Gogate, L. J., & Ruiz, I. (2002). Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: the salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Development, 73, 1629–1643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human. Infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 3253–3258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The acquisition of abstract words by young infants. Cognition, 127, 391–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973). One word at a time. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. & Cote, L. R. (with Maital, S., Painter, K., Park, S.-Y., Pascual, L. et al.) (2004). Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development, 75, 1115–1139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Gopnik, A. (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 22, 497–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language Development., Vol.2: Language, thought, and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Early acquisition of nouns and verbs: Evidence from Navaho. In V. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman. Taylor & Francis: New York, NY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1, 23–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. & Trueswell, J. C. (in press).
Golinkoff, R. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2008). How toddlers learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 397–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. (1995). Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: Nouns are not always learned before verbs. In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haith, M. M. (1980). Rules that babies look by: The organization of visual activity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, M., Barrett, M., Jones, D., & Brookes, S. (1988). Linguistic input and early word meaning. Journal of Child Language, 15, 77–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Reasoning about containment events in very young children. Cognition, 78, 207–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hespos, S. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430(6998), 453–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellman, P. J. & Arterberry, M. E. (2006). Perceptual development. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Eds.). The handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language, 6th edition (pp. 109–160). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellman, P. J. & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (2010). The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition, 2, 21–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). On the spatial foundations of the conceptual system and its enrichment. Cognitive Science, 36, 421–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Attention as the origin of meaning formation. In Marchetti, G., Benedetti, G., & Alharbi, A. (Eds.) Attention and meaning: The attentional basis of meaning, (pp. 273–290). Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. & Pagan Canovas, C. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 6, 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCune, L. (2008). How children learn to learn language. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nomikou, I., Rolfing, K., Cimiano, P., Mandler, J. M. (2019). Evidence for early comprehension of action verbs. Language Learning and Development, 15, 64–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulverman, R., Song, L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pruden, S. M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Preverbal infants’ attention to manner and path: Foundations for learning relational terms. Child Development, 84, 241–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C. (2003). Concepts are not just for objects: Categorization of spatial relation information by infants. In D. H. Rakison & L. M. Oakes (Eds.), Early category and concept development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simion, F., Regolin, L., Bulf, H. A. Predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):809–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and Syntax of Motion. In J. Kimball, (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardiff, T., Gelman, S. A., & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the “noun bias” in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 70, 620–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Todd, J. (1983). Joint attention and early lexical acquisition style. First Language, 4, 197–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodard, L. R., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Two-and three-year-olds track a single meaning during word learning: Evidence for propose-but-verify. Language Learning and Development, 12, 252–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Baker-Watad, Rawan Abu, Maali Jammal-Agbaria, Jawnaa Zuabi & Naomi Havron
2025. The relationship between maternal input, culture, and the strength of noun bias in Palestinian-Arabic-learning infants. Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue