In:Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 205–222
Experiential viewpoint, simile and dynamicity in discourse
Published online: 9 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.11dan
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.11dan
Abstract
The proposal to consider the use of metaphor from the perspective of discourse dynamicity is
becoming increasingly popular. In this chapter, I give the idea further support, but I also suggest two additions: a
closer look at how dynamicity works in various discourse types and a clearer focus on how dynamicity is achieved
through the use of various figurative forms. Besides, I argue for a more structured understanding of the link between
discourse, figuration and experiential viewpoint. I consider a range of examples, from various discourses, including
literary texts, to substantiate the types of research questions facing the idea of dynamicity.
Article outline
- 1.Types of experience and experiential viewpoint
- 2.Simile and metaphor: Constructional features and discourse
- 3.Discourse dynamicity and figurative form: Simile and other tropes
- 4.Non-figurative narrative elaboration
- 5.Where does this lead?
Notes References
References (43)
Bowdle, Brian F. and Dedre Gentner. (2005). The
career of metaphor. Psychological
Review 112(1): 193–216.
Brandt, Line and Per Aage Brandt. (2005). Making
sense of a blend: a cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of
Cognitive
Linguistics 3: 216–249.
Cameron, Lynne. (2007). Patterns
of metaphor in reconciliation talk. Discourse and
Society 18: 197–222.
Cameron, Lynne, Robert Maslen, Zazie Todd, John Maule, Peter Stratton & Neil Stanley. (2009. The
discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse
analysis Metaphor and
Symbol 24: 63–89.
Dancygier, Barbara. (2009). Genitives
and proper names in constructional blends. In Vyvyan Evans and Stephanie Pourcel (eds.), New
directions in cognitive
linguistics, 161–84.
. (2011). Modification
and constructional blends in the use of proper names. Constructions and
Frames 3(2), 208–35.
(ed). (2017a). The
Cambridge handbook of cognitive
linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2017b). Cognitive
Linguistics and the study of textual
meaning. In Dancygier 2017a (ed), 607–622.
Dancygier, Barbara and Adrian Lou. (2019). It’s
like if constructions and stance off-loading in multimodal
artifacts. Paper presented at the 15th
International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Nishinomiya,
Japan, August 7, 2019
Dorst, Aletta G. (2011). Metaphor in
fiction: language, thought and communication. PhD
Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. (2002). The
way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gentner, Dedre, and Brian Bowdle. (2001). Convention,
form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and
Symbol 16(3/4), 223–47.
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment
and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr and Lynne Cameron. (2008). The
socio-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems
Research, 9, 64–75.
Glucksberg, Sam, and Boaz Keysar. (1993). How
metaphors work. In Andrew Ortony (ed.) Metaphor
and thought, Cambridge University Press: 401–24.
Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson. (1999). Blending
and metaphor. In Gerard Steen and Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Israel, Michael, Jennifer Riddle Harding, and Vera Tobin. (2004). On
simile. In Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language,
culture and mind, 123–35. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kövecses, Zoltán. (1995). Anger:
its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural
evidence. In John R. Taylor and Robert E. MacLaury (eds.), Language
and the cognitive construal of the
world, 181–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (1999). Philosophy
in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Moder, Carol. (2008). It’s
like making a soup: metaphors and similes in spoken news
discourse. In Andrea Tyler, Yiyoung Kim, and Mari Takada (eds.), Language
in the context of use: discourse and cognitive approaches to
language, 301–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2010). Two
puzzle pieces: fitting discourse context and constructions into Cognitive Metaphor
Theory. English Text
Construction 3(2) 294–320.
Müller, Cornelia. (2008). Metaphors
dead and alive, sleeping and waking: a dynamic view. University of Chicago Press.
Semino, Elena. (2016). Descriptions
of pain, metaphor and embodied simulation. Metaphor and
Symbol 25(4): 205–26.
Semino, Elena and Zsófia Demjén (eds). (2017). The
Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. London and New York: Routledge
Sullivan, Karen. (2013). Frames
and constructions in metaphoric
language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Colston, Herbert L.
2025. The big figurative picture. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 14 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
Holm, Anne & Esme Richardson-Owen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
