Cover not available

In:Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 109–128

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Fictive motion in the wild

 | University of CaliforniaMerced
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.06mat
Abstract
Fictive motion is a form of figurative language that describes the shape and arrangement of objects in physical space. Examples are The highway goes along the coast, A trail follows the creek for two miles, and Boulders run along the edge of the property. Such statements typically feature a motion verb, such as go, run, or follow, and a subject noun phrase that refers to a linear object or a set of objects in a linear sequence. Despite the objectively stationary disposition of the scene being described, a fleeting sense of motion is implied. To date, much research on fictive motion has focused on its semantic profile or how it is comprehended, but little attention has been given to how fictive motion is used in natural discourse. This chapter provides some background on fictive motion and offers some new insights on its use in real world spatial descriptions, in particular, in the descriptions of paths in hiking guides. This work expands existing research on figurative language use, especially how fictive motion is motivated by and grounded in embodied cognition, why it is used in travel guides, and its potential utility to navigation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is fictive motion?
  • 3.How is fictive motion understood?
  • 4.Fictive motion in travel language
  • 5.Fictive motion in hiking guidebooks
  • 6.Closing remarks
  • References
References (79)
References
Abdulkareem, M. A., & Al-Jashamy, D. Z. (2021). The constructional analysis of emanation fictive motion in Arabic: A cognitive semantic-syntactic study. Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 29(6), 257–270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2007). Experimental methods for simulation semantics. Methods in cognitive linguistics, 277–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, T., & Matlock, T. (2015). Watching fictive motion in action: Discourse data from the TV News Archive. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Conference, Pasadena.
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2014). Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 13(3), 395–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, A. M. (2011). The creaky knees guide Northern California. Seattle, WA.: Sasquatch Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2095–2114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Buildings that move: Motion metaphors in architectural reviews. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, (34), 89–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelli, G. (2012). Travelling in space: Spatial representation in English and Italian tourism discourse. Textus, 25(1), 19–0.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. (2015). Using figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Franco, P. D. G., Matthews, J. L., & Matlock, T. (2016). Framing the past: How virtual experience affects bodily description of artefacts. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 17, 179–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunham, J. (2020). The open road: 50 best road trips in the USA. Berkeley, CA.: Avalon Travel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egorova, E., Tenbrink, T., & Purves, R. S. (2018). Fictive motion in the context of mountaineering. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 18(4), 259–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falck, M. J., & Gibbs, R. W. (2012). Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 251–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, J. (2008). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(11), 512–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 61(3), 309–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and language, 84(1), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Embodiment and cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 161–176). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golledge, R. G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In R. E. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 5–45). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, T. (2013). Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions?. Lingua, 133, 319–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Im, S. (2003). Metaphor of Motion in English and Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar, 33, 131–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imazato, N. (2012). Fictive Motion in the Visual Expressions in Japanese Sign Language. Research Reports of Kobe City College of Technology, 50, 181–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julich-Warpakowksi, N. (2019). Why do we understand music as moving? The metaphorical basis of musical motion revisited. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception Metaphors (pp. 165–184), John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in cognitive science, 4(4), 773–785. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 455–471. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 77–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, S. (2014). Coextension paths in modern standard Chinese. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(1), 119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. (2013). The motion behind the symbols: A vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mark, D. M., Turk, A. G., Burenhult, N., & Stea, D. (Eds.). (2011). Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsh, M. N. (2019). Near-death and out-of-body experiences in sensing the divine: One foundational role in religion’s evolution. In The Evolution of Religion, Religiosity and Theology (pp. 120–137). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004a). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 221–248). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Depicting fictive motion in drawings. In J. Luchenbroers, (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics Investigations: Across languages, fields and philosophical boundaries (pp. 67–85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2, 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor, simulation and fictive motion. In Barbara Dancygier (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T. (2015). Fictive motion. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 545–561). Berlin and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive science, 29(4), 655–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T., & Richardson, D. C. (2004). Do eye movements go with fictive motion? In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 909–914). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N. (2010). Online fictive motion understanding: An eye-movement study with Hindi. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 144–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah and A. Miyake, The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 257–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Cognition and spatial behavior. International encyclopedia of geography: people, the earth, environment and technology: people, the earth, environment and technology, 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morey, K. & White, M. (2006). Sierra south. Birmingham, AL: Wilderness Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mungra, P. (2007). Metaphors among titles of medical publications: An observational study. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, (14), 99–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E. (2004). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In F. Iida, R. Pfeifer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Eds.), Embodied artificial intelligence (pp. 54–73). Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). The cognitive science of mathematics: Why is it relevant for mathematics education? In Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 127–154). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núnez, R. E., Huang, R. S., & Sereno, M. (2007). Neural basis of metaphorical abstraction: An fMRI study of ego-reference-point spatial construals of time. In Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York (pp. 284–85).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Eye movements in language and cognition. Methods in cognitive linguistics, 18, 323–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C. and Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: an eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition 102(1), 129–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2003). Fictive motion in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 123–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sambre, P. (2005). Blended conceptualisation in trade flow diagrams. In G. Erreygers & Geert Jacobs (Eds.), Language, Communication and the Economy (pp. 101–126). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (11), 2480–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The Primacy of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swedo, S. (2011). Hiking Yosemite National Park. Guilford, CT: Falcon Guides.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. (2018). Deictic motion constructions in Japanese and Thai. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese Contrastive Linguistics (pp. 291–312). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick (Ed.), Spatial Orientation. Theory, Research and Application. (pp. 225–282). New York and London: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception.” In P. Bloom, M. F. Garrett, L. Nadel, & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA and London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taremaa, P. (2013). Fictive and actual motion in Estonian: Encoding space. SKY journal of linguistics, 26, 151–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomczak, E., & Ewert, A. (2015). Real and fictive motion processing in Polish L2 users of English and monolinguals: Evidence for different conceptual representations. The Modern Language Journal, 99(S1), 49–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. The psychology of learning and motivation, 27, 109–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twardzisz, P. (2000). Virtual and actual existentials in English, Swedish and Icelandic1. Nordic journal of linguistics, 23(2), 163–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Østergaard, S., Østergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. NeuroReport, 16, 649–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenk, E. & White, M. (2021). Sierra north. Birmingham, AL: Wilderness Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, R. (2000). Olympic Mountains trail guide: National park and national forest. Seattle, WA: The Mountaineers Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue