In:Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 77–94
Feeling for speaking
How expressive body movements ground verbal descriptions of emotions
Published online: 9 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.04mul
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.04mul
Abstract
In this paper, attention is drawn to the embodied experiences that are mobilized when speakers are
asked to describe emotions. By analyzing how people use expressive body movements and language when thinking
and speaking about emotion concepts, light is thrown on “People’s subjective, felt experiences of their
bodies in action” (Gibbs, 2005: 9). It illustrates how experiencing emotion
concepts bodily provides “part of the fundamental grounding for language and thought.” (Gibbs, 2005: 9). The title of this chapter alludes to Daniel I. Slobin’s reformulation of the
linguistic relativity hypothesis. Slobin counters Wilhelm von Humboldt and Benjamin L. Whorf
static understanding of the relationship between “thought and language” with a dynamic idea of this relation which he
terms Thinking for speaking (Slobin, 1996: 76). We report
a small study indicating that speakers not only express affective experiences as conceptual content, but perform or
indicate expressive body movements before or while describing a specific emotion. The chapter thus suggests a very
concrete way of understanding Gibbs’ assumption of an “embodiment premise for language and thought”.
Keywords: thinking for speaking, gestures, embodiment, emotions, experiencing
Article outline
- Introduction
- Study design
- Data
- Methods
- Findings
- Micro-analytic case studies
- Surprise is straightening oneself up
- Pride is a feeling of raised shoulders and an upright posture
- Fear is a lump of lead in the belly and a contracted body
- Happiness is a feeling that wants to get out and up in circles
- Is feeling for speaking a frequent phenomenon?
- Feeling first: A relevant phenomenon?
- Variable forms of embodied grounding
- Summary
- Conclusion: Feeling for speaking – experiencing grounds speaking
Acknowledgements References
References (28)
Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig and Cornelia Müller. (2013) Linguistic
Annotation System for Gestures (LASG). In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.): Body –
Language – Communication: An international Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science
38.1.), 1098–1124. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller (eds.) (2008) Metaphor
and Gesture. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ekman, Paul. (1984). Expression
and the nature of emotion. In Ekman, Paul and Klaus Scherer (eds.) Approaches
to Emotion. New York, London: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
Kappelhoff, Hermann and Cornelia Müller. (2011) Embodied
meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature
film. Metaphor and the Social
World, 1(2): 121–153.
Kita, Sotaro. (2000) How
representational gestures help speaking. In McNeill, David (ed) Language
and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 162–185.
Ladewig, Silva H. (2014a) Creating
multimodal utterances. The linear integration of gestures into
speech. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.): Body –
Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science
38.2.) Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter: Mouton, 1662–1677.
(2014b) The cyclic
gesture. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.): Body –
Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science
38.2.) Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter: Mouton, 1605–1618.
(2020) Integrating
Gestures. The Dimension of Multimodality in Cognitive
Grammar, De Gruyter Mouton.
McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan. (2000) Growth
Points in Thinking for Speaking. In McNeill, David (ed.): Language
and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–161.
Müller, Cornelia. (1998) Redebegleitende
Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie –
Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH.
. (2004) The
Palm-Up-Open-Hand. A case of a gesture
family? In: Cornelia Müller and Roland Posner (eds.): The
semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. The Berlin
Conference, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler.
. (2007) A
Dynamic View on Metaphor, Gesture and
Thought. In: Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell and Elena T. Levy (eds.): Gesture
and the Dynamic Dimension of Language. Essays in Honor of David
McNeill, 109–116. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. (2008a) Metaphors
Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic
View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (2008b) What
gestures reveal about the nature of
metaphor. In: Alan Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds.): Metaphor
and
Gesture, 219–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2010) Wie
Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische
Perspektive. In: Irene Mittelberg (ed.): Sprache
und Gestik. Sonderheft der Zeitschrift Sprache und
Literatur, 41(1): 37–68.
. (2017) Waking
Metaphors. Embodied Cognition in Multimodal
Discourse. In: Beate Hampe (ed.): Metaphor.
Embodied Cognition in
Discourse, 297–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2019) Metaphorizing
as Embodied Interactivity: What Gesturing and Film Viewing Can Tell Us About an Ecological View on
Metaphor. Metaphor and
Symbol, 34(1): 61–79.
Müller, Cornelia and Alan Cienki. (2014) Ways
of viewing metaphor in gesture. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds.): Body –
Language – Communication: An international Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science
38.2.). Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Müller, Cornelia & Hermann Kappelhoff. (2018) Cinematic
Metaphor. Experience – Affectivity –
Temporality. In collaboration
with Greifenstein, Sarah / Horst, Dorothea / Scherer, Thomas / Schmitt, Christina. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, Reihe: Cinepoetics – English Edition 4.
Müller, Cornelia & Silva Ladewig. (2013) Metaphors
for Sensorimotor Experiences: Gestures as Embodied and Dynamic Conceptualizations of Balance in Dance
Lessons. In: Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier and Jennifer Hinell (eds.): Language
and the Creative
Mind. Stanford: CSLI, 295–324.
Müller, Cornelia & Susanne Tag. (2010) The
Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational
Interaction. Cognitive
Semiotics, 6: 85–120.
Slobin, Dan I. (1991) Learning to
think for speaking. Native language, cognition, and rhetorical
style. In: Pragmatics 1, 1–25.
(1996) From ‘thought
to language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In: John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, S. (eds.): Rethinking
linguistic
relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–96.
Streeck, Jürgen. (2009) Gesturecraft.
The manu-facture of meaning. (= Gesture Studies
2). Amsterdam.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Boieblan, Mostafa
2024. Grounded cognition and the role of musical expertise in shaping synesthetic metaphors among a music speech
community. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
