Cover not available

In:Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar and Kristina Š. Despot
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 8] 2019
► pp. 225–252

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
Metaphor repositories and cross-linguistic comparison

Ontological eggs and chickens

 | University of Osijek
 | ELTE, Budapest
 | University of Rijeka
Published online: 6 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.8.10brd
This chapter focuses on the relationship between repositories of figurative speech, cross-linguistic research and ontology models. We first demonstrate on two case studies some problems caused by cross-linguistic comparison of some conceptual metaphors and claim that the interaction between repositories and cross-linguistic research results in more synergy if an ontology model mediates between them. We then present the architecture of the Ontological Model of Concepts and Construction that seeks to capture the ontological and conceptual organization in 16 emergent layers and (super)impose a referential lexical and constructional layer of language-specific knowledge, metaphor appearing as a conceptual process involving the violation of the ontological congruency between concepts activated by linguistic construction triggering emergent enrichment of the construed concept.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Case studies
    • 2.1Metaphors in medical discourse
    • 2.2Time metaphors: Moving time vs. moving ego
  • 3.Towards a larger picture
    • 3.1An ontology model of lexical concepts and constructions
    • 3.2Emergent hierarchy of concepts
    • 3.3The structure of the emergent ontology model
    • 3.4Classifying concepts and creating mereological relations in OMLCC
    • 3.5Modelling lexical concepts and words
    • 3.6Identifying metaphorical constructions
  • 4.Conclusion
  • ?ack?
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D. (2015). Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems (Vol. 213). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M. (2017). Intensification and metonymy in some XYZ constructions: From the Bible to Einstein. LaMiCus – Language, Mind, Culture and Society, 1, 110–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2017). Moving-time and moving-ego metaphors from a translational and contrastive-linguistic perspective. Research in Language, 15(2), 191–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., Brdar-Szabó, R. & Perak, B. (in press). Separating (non-)figurative weeds from wheat. In A. Baicchi (Ed.), Figurative thought and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–64). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayton, P. (2006). Conceptual foundations of emergence theory. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Ed.), The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 83–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997a). theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997b). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D Dissertation. Berkeley, Dept. of Linguistics, U.C.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information systems: Proceedings of the first international conference (FOIS’98), June 6–8, Trento, Italy (Vol. 46, pp. 3). IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to western thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Licata, I., & Sakaji, A. (Eds.). (2008). Physics of emergence and organization. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljubešić, N. & Klubička, F. (2014). {bs,hr,sr}WaC – web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. In F. Bildhauer & R. Schäfer (Eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Web as Corpus Workshop (WaC-9) (pp. 29−35). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2013). Frames and the experiential basis of the moving time metaphor. In M. Fried, & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.) Advances in frame semantics (pp. 85−108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perak, B., & D’Alessio, S. P. (2013). Culture as an emergent property of the embodied cognition. In S. Puljar D’Alessio, & N. Fanuko (Eds.) Avanture kulture: kulturalni studiji u lokalnom kontekstu. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, I., Webber, J., & Eifrem, E. (2015). Graph databases: new opportunities for connected data. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweda, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2009). The “spare parts person”? Conceptions of the human body and their implications for public attitudes towards organ donation and organ sale. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 4(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2008). Language and social ontology. Theory and Society, 7, 443–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimazono, Y. (2013). Accommodating a “foreign” organ inside the body: Post-transplant bodily experiences of Filipino kidney recipients. Ars Vivendi Journal, 3, 24–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, R., & Havasi, C. (2013). ConceptNet 5: A large semantic network for relational knowledge. In I. Gurevych, & J. Kim (Eds), The people’s web meets NLP (pp. 161–176). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language (vol. 3, pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of knowledge representation (Vol. 1). Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varzi, A. C. (2014). Mereology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. (1987). A taxonomy of part–whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 417–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yadav, U., Narula, G. S., Duhan, N., Jain, V., & Murthy, B. K. (2016). Development and visualization of domain specific ontology using Protege. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(16). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ban Kirigin, Tajana & Benedikt Perak
2020. There’s No Time, The Problem of Conceptualising Time. In Logic, Language, and Security [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12300], ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue