In:Mixing Metaphor
Edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr.
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 6] 2016
► pp. 203–222
Chapter 10. A corpus-based study of ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic comment
Published online: 18 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.10sem
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.10sem
This chapter investigates the use of the expression ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic comment in the two-billion-word Oxford English Corpus. I consider the co-text of 141 occurrences of ‘mixed metaphor’ in the corpus, in order to shed light on the kinds of uses of metaphors that writers opt to explicitly draw attention to as involving ‘mixing’. I show how folk understandings of ‘mixed metaphor’ include phenomena that do not correspond to the technical use of the term in the specialist literature, and reflect on the implications of these findings for metaphor theory. Some attention is given to the use of the phrase ‘mixed metaphor’ in different genres, the relevance of grammatical boundaries to perception of ‘mixing’ between metaphors, and the possible pragmatic motivation for using ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic label. The study broadly confirms the prevailing view that the notion of ‘mixed metaphor’ often involves a negative evaluation of a particular stretch of language and of the speaker/writer who produced it. However, in a substantial minority of cases, the phrase is used humorously to point out what are in fact creative, witty and highly effective uses of metaphor.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Culture-specific variation in interpretations of nations as
bodies metaphors by English and German L1 speakers. In Cultural Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 103], ► pp. 15 ff.
Torres Martínez, Sergio Alberto
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
梁, 伟敏
Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020. Introduction. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
