Cover not available

In:Metaphor in Specialist Discourse:
Edited by J. Berenike Herrmann and Tony Berber Sardinha
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 4] 2015
► pp. 53–76

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Metaphors in psychology genres

Counseling vs. academic lectures

Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.03beg
This chapter analyzes metaphor use in specialist discourse by comparing anger and love metaphor use in experts in the domain of psychology in two different genres, online counseling and academic lectures. The study is based on two small-scale corpora that comprise written and spoken language and were compiled for an exploratory investigation. The analysis of linguistic and conceptual metaphors in the discourse contexts in which the metaphors are used brings out interesting differences in the experts’ metaphor use for love and anger between the two genres. I argue that these differences are probably due to the distinctive groups of participants as well as the different discourse structures and goals in the psychology genres, online counseling and academic lecturing.
References (29)
References
Angus, L., & Kormann, Y. (2002). Conflict, coherence and change in brief psychotherapy: A metaphor theme analysis. In S.R. Fussel (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions (pp. 151–167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beger, A. (2011a). ANGER, LOVE and SADNESS revisited: Studying emotion metaphors in authentic discourse between experts and laypersons. Flensburg: Flensburg University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011b). Emotion metaphors: Differences in discourse between experts and laypersons. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence: Methodological and theoretical issues for Linguistic Research (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011c). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorik.de, 20, 39–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blow up. (2014). Retrieved April 7, 2014, from [URL]
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corts, D.P., & Pollio, H.R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(2), 81–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (1988). The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 205–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). Case study 1: Anger. In G. Lakoff (Ed.), Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind (pp. 380–415). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (2002). On aggression (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, G., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A. (2008). Metaphor use in three UK university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMullen, L.M., & Conway, J.B. (2002). Conventional metaphors for depression. In S.R. Fussel (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions (pp. 167–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A.C.C. Müller (Ed.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 115–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, D. (2008). Social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. (2003). “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 125–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C.M. (2004). The conceptualization of anger in English and Spanish. A cognitive approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Murcia, Murcia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In M. Callies, W.R. Keller, & A. Lohöfer (Eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences: Avenues, challenges, and limitations (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Smedinga, Marthe, Alan Cienki & Henk W. de Regt
2023. Metaphors as tools for understanding in science communication among experts and to the public. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Egg, Markus
2020. To those walking in the footsteps of the faith. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Motion metaphors in music criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue