In:Metaphor in Specialist Discourse:
Edited by J. Berenike Herrmann and Tony Berber Sardinha
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 4] 2015
► pp. 17–52
Register variation and metaphor use
A multi-dimensional perspective
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.02ber
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.02ber
One of the consistent findings in the literature from a corpus-based perspective
is that the incidence of metaphor varies across different registers. The goal of
this chapter is to verify to what extent the variation in metaphor use is systematic
in English, from a Multi-Dimensional perspective. The VU University
Annotated Metaphor Corpus was used, comprising over 200,000 words in four
registers. In total, 250 different features were included in the study. The main
results show which dimensions underlie metaphor use in English, how metaphor
relates to the dimensions of variation in English, how much variation can
be accounted for by knowing register distinctions, and which are the metaphorbased
text types in English.
References (36)
Berber Sardinha, T. (2008a). Metaphor probabilities in corpora. In M.S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 127–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2008b). Telling one’s life stories with metaphors: A corpus-driven investigation. Paper presented at the
International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM 7), Cáceres, Spain.
. (2011a). Dimensions of variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at the
10th AACL, American Association for Corpus Linguistics
, Atlanta, GA.
. (2011b). Dimensions of variation in metaphor use. Paper presented at the
Corpus Linguistics Conference
, Birmingham, UK.
. (2012a). An assessment of metaphor retrieval methods. In F. MacArthur, J.L. Oncins Martínez, M. Sánchez García, & A.M. Piquer Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 21–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012b). Metaphors of the Brazilian economy from 1964–2010. In H. Herrera Soler & M. White (Eds.), Metaphors and mills (pp. 103–126). Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Acunzo, C.M. (2014a). A multidimensional analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora, 9(2), 239–271.
. (2014b). Dimensions of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. In T. Berber Sardinha, & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 35–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (1995). Dimensions of register variation – A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2004). Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In G. Purnelle, C. Fairon, & A. Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the statistical analysis of textual data (pp. 15–34). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1–37.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bick, E. (2009). Introducing probabilistic information in Constraint Grammar parsing.
Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2009
, Liverpool, UK.
. (2008). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Stelma, J.H. (2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 7–36.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dorst, A.G. (2011). Metaphor in fiction: Language, thought and communication. Oisterwijk: Box Press.
Gibbs, R.W. (2008). Metaphor and thought. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, A., Koller, V., Rayson, P., & Semino, E. (2007). Exploiting a Semantic Annotation Tool for Metaphor Analysis. Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2007), University of Birmingham, UK.
Herrmann, J.B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.
McEntee-Atalianis, L.J. (2013). Stance and metaphor: Mapping changing representations of (organizational) identity. Discourse and Communication, 7(3), 319–340.
Parodi, G. (2007). Variation across registers in Spanish: Exploring the El-Grial PUCV Corpus. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (pp. 11–53). London: Continuum.
Pasma, T. (2011). Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news discourse. Oisterwijk: Box Press.
Piquer-Piriz, A. (2008). Young learners’ understanding of figurative language. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 183–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rey, J. (2001). Changing gender roles in popular culture: Dialogue in Star Trek episodes from 1966 to 1993. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 138–156). Harlow: Longman.
Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zanotto, M., & Vesaro Palma, D. (2008). Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor’. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 11–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zhao, N. (2009). The minimum sample size in factor analysis. Retrieved from [URL], on April 1, 2012.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Musolff, Andreas
2025. Divergent conceptualizations of the COVID-19 pandemic and its management as a war in Britain and
Germany. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 170 ff.
Chen, Joanna Zhuoan, Kathleen Ahrens & Dennis Tay
Alejo-González, Rafael
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
