In:COVID-19: Metaphor and metonymy across languages and cultures
Edited by Xu Wen, Wei-lun Lu, Joe Lennon and Zoltán Kövecses
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 11] 2025
► pp. 343–344
Index
Published online: 6 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.11.index
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.11.index
A
- agentivization91
- Anglosphere 153–154
- attention 219, 223
B
- Barrier 251–252, 257, 259, 267–268
- beat clashes287
- Black Summer 152–154, 163, 166–167
- blended space 313–314
- blending105
- blitz spirit 172, 176
- burnt fuel162
- butterfly effect137
C
- cognitive and generalized commitments86
- collocational analysis 26, 28
- Collocational analysis 26, 28–29
- collocations86
- Complex Physical Objects21
- compounds 105–106
- Conceptual Blending Theory304
- conceptual integration network304
- Conceptual Metaphor Theory 17, 23, 41–42, 51, 63–64, 68, 171, 217–218, 325
- conceptual structure 153, 224
- conditionals257
- conspiracy theory 177, 182–183
- containment 158–164
- conventional metaphor 18, 137
- corona-eng-deu corpus 173–174
- Coronavirus Corpus159
- corpus reliability127
- Critical Metaphor Analysis 173, 218, 223
D
- deictic center 250, 256
- deictic gestures279
- deictic ground 259, 261, 264, 267
- deliberate metaphors 219, 224
- deliberateness of the metaphor223
- derivatives106
- direct quotation65
- disaster metaphor 52–53
- discourse-historical 174, 183
- discursive gestures279
- door god309
- dramatic tension 320, 332
E
- eight immortals309
- elimination 161, 163
- embodiment88
- entailment162
F
- fictive deixis 257, 260, 262
- Fisher exact test 156–158
- flood metaphor47
- frame 68–69, 250
- frame structures266
- framing218
- frequency time series86
- fuel consumption 159–160, 162, 165
G
- GAT2 transcription conventions281
- gesture form277
- Grim Reaper308
- guidelines for identifying metaphors in gestures (MIG-G)279
H
- hapax15
- Hausa language43
- hyperbolic metaphors179
I
- iconic gestures279
- identification procedure279
- illocutionary force280
- imperative 257–259
- integrated metaphor123
- inter-coder reliability154
- interpersonal agreement 134, 136, 146
- intrapersonal consistency 134, 136, 146
- killer metaphor 51–52
L
- Leipzig Glossing Rules67
- lemma225
- Linguistic Dimensions195
- Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 192, 195
- linguistic-semiotic approach277
- lockdown 11, 181–185
M
- mapping 17, 162, 218
- master metaphor87
- media artifact302
- mental space 257–258
- Mental Spaces Theory 304, 319
- MetaNet 18–19, 68–69
- metaphor 17, 21, 41–42, 63–64, 86–88
- metaphor crafting 141–142, 144
- metaphor identification 223–224
- Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP) 66–67
- Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) 44, 154, 173, 223
- Metaphor Scenario Analysis173
- metaphorical gestures279
- metaphorical mapping 69–71, 243
- metaphorically used words (MRW) 44, 89
- metaphoricity 227, 279–280
- metonymic key-words and names183
- metonymic references176
- military metaphor 58, 159, 164
- mode(s) of representation280
- monomodal metaphors 280–281
- moral beauty265
- multimodal metaphors 280–281, 286–287
- musical grammar 321, 336
N
- new cartoons 301–302, 304–305
- NOW corpus 153–155, 158–159
O
- Opera Plus320
P
- performative/pragmatic gestures279
- personification 24, 226, 230
- personified metaphor287
- persuasion123
- phonological pole323
- physical revulsion322
- polite directive speech act258
- proper physical distancing253
- prototypical integration network304
- proximal deixis267
- Psychological Processes 71, 195–196, 206
- PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder)116
R
- referential gestures279
- ReframeCovid initiative 153, 159
- roles on opera stage310
S
- self-integration146
- self-persuasion 145–147
- sentiment analysis192
- social context of metaphor 64–65
- source domain 17, 195–197
- spatial/orientational metaphor51
- state rhetoric222
- stemming option15
- strategic metaphor123
- submapping 21, 25–26
- synchronic co-incidence criterion127
T
- target domain17
- The Hausas43
- topic modelling (TM)14
- topical prevalence15
U
- urgency 159–161, 166
V
- visual blending processes 114–115
- visual metaphor 302–303
W
- WAR metaphor 58, 75–79
X
- X2 test of independence 199, 203
