Article published In: Italo-Romance Morphosyntax: Theoretical and empirical issues
Edited by Francesco Maria Ciconte and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistic Variation 26:1] 2026
► pp. 61–75
On the interpretation of inflected subject clitics
Published online: 18 August 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.25003.lor
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.25003.lor
Abstract
This paper discusses the distribution of subject clitics in nominal copular constructions in the variety of Este
(PD) which is a partial pro-drop language where null subjects alternate with subject proclitics: when a
postverbal subject NP is present, no subject clitic is allowed with lexical verbs. However, subject proclitics are allowed with
postverbal subjects in inverse copular sentences where the postverbal NP agrees with both the copula and the subject proclitic.
This paper explores the available discourse semantic interpretations of inverse copular sentences resulting by this inflectional
pattern: while the preverbal predicative NP is a topicalized intensional element that instantiates a description, the postverbal
NP represents new information. The preverbal predicative NP does not refer to an entity, but to a property representing the subset
that includes the postverbal subject NP which a focal element introduced, just in this configuration, by a subject proclitic.
Article outline
- 0.Introduction
- 1.The distribution of proclitics in Este variety
- 2.Agreement in inverse copular sentences
- 3.The informational status of postverbal subject in copular sentences
- 3.1Information structure and the invariant clitic ‘a’
- 3.2Information structure and negative quantifiers
- 3.3NP1 and NP2 movement
- 3.4The syntax of inverse copulars
- 4.Concluding remarks
- Notes
References
References (22)
Badan, Linda & Paolo Lorusso. 2021. Subject
clitics in nominal copular sentences: some insight from a North Eastern variety of
Italian. Qulso 71, 9–32.
Bejar, Susana, and Kahnemuyipour Arsalan. 2017. Non-canonical
Agreement in Copular Sentences. Journal of
Linguistics 53 (3): 463–499.
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects
of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The
structure of CP and IP (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol
2), 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana & Bianchi, Valentina. 2016. Definiteness
Effect and unaccusative subjects: An overview and some new
thoughts. In Fischer, Susann; Kupisch, Tanja & Rinke, Ester (eds.), Definiteness
Effects: Bilingual, typological and diachronic
variation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 14–65.
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky. 1995. The
order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 131. 489–526.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds). 2010. Parametric
Variation: Null subjects in Minimalist
Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Toward
a cartography of subject positions. In Luigi Rizzi, (ed.) The
Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic
Structures, 21, 115–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivationbyphase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken
Hale:A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference
and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic
Inquiry 25 (4): 609–665.
Manzini, M. Rita, and Leonardo M. Savoia. 2005. I
dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi
generativa (31 volumes) Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
. 2007. A
unification of morphology and symtax. Studies in Romance and Albanian
varieties. London: Routledge.
Manzini, M. Rita & Diego Pescarini. 2022. The
clitic string as a Pair Merge sequence. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics 45(1).
Nevins, A. Multiple
agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Nat Lang Linguist
Theory 291, 939–971 (2011).
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The
Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian
Dialects, Oxford, OUP.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements
of grammar: a handbook of generative
syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
