Article In: Linguistic Variation: Online-First Articles
Two arguments for a transformational approach to second position elements
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The literature on second position elements (a.k.a. second position clitics) is
characterized by a longstanding discussion as to whether these elements are base-generated
in second position or whether they are base-generated in first position and only arrive in
second position as the result of a subsequent transformation. In this paper, I will
provide two arguments for the transformational approach based on a typological study of
second position coordinators (Weisser 2024), i.e. coordinators that appear inside of one
of their conjuncts rather than in the semantically transparent peripheral position (e.g.
in between the two conjuncts). The first argument will be based on the observation that,
although the coordinators usually occupy a second position within their coordinands, they
also show positional alternations in some syntactic contexts. These alternations, I argue,
can be derived in both transformational and base-generation models. However, we find that
the kinds of empirically attested alternations are systematically restricted in a way that
falls out of a transformational approach but that cannot be captured in a base-generation
approach. In other words, the base-generation approach massively overgenerates predicting
much more alternations than we actually find. The second argument is based on opaque
interactions between the second position placement and other morphosyntactic
operations.
Keywords: second position, clitics, coordinators, postsyntactic dislocation
Article outline
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The debate: Base-generation vs transformations
- 3 Shifting Coordinators
- 4 Alternations of shifting coordinators
- 4.1 The data
- 4.2 The argument for a transformational account
- 5 Opacity
- 6 Consequences
- 7 Conclusion
References
References (40)
Aelbrecht, Lobke (2010): The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis. John Benjamins, Amsterdam..
Anderson, Stephen R. (2005): Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford..
Aremu, Daniel & Philipp Weisser (2024): Prosodically determined coordinator placement in Yorùbá, Glossa: A journal of general linguistics9(1).
Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo & John Payne (2011): There are no special clitics. In: A. Galani, G. Hicks & G. Tsoulas, eds., Morphology and its interfaces. John Benjamins, pp. 57–96..
Booij, Geert & Jerzy Rubach (1987): Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in lexical phonology, Linguistic Inquiry18(1), 1–44.
Borsley, Robert & M.-L. Rivero (1994): Clitic Auxliaries and Incorporation in Polish, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory12(3), 373–422.
Bošković, Željko (2001): On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier..
Chung, Sandra (2003): The Syntax and Prosody of Weak Pronouns in Chamorro, Linguistic Inquiry34(4), 547–599..
Dogil, Grzegorz (1987): Lexical Phonology and Floating Affixation in Polish. In: Phonologica 1984. Cambridge University Press, London.
Embick, David (1998): Mobile Inflections in Polish. In: J. N. Beckman, ed., Proceedings of NELS 25. GLSA, pp. 127–142.
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer (2001): Movement operations after syntax, Linguistic Inquiry321, 555–595..
(2007): Distributed Morphology and the Syntax/Morphology Interface. In: G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franks, Stephen & Piotr Bański (1999): Approaches to “Schizophrenic” Polish person agreement. In: H. C.. C. M. V. K. Dziwirek, ed., Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Seattle meeting. Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 123–144.
Ha, Seungwan (2008): Ellipsis, Right Node Raising and Across the Board Constructions. PhD thesis, Boston University, Boston.
(1995): The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In: M. Haspelmath & E. König, eds., Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 1–55..
Ilori, Johnson Folorunso (2010): Nominal Constructions in Igálà and Yorùbá. PhD thesis, Postgraduate Schoole of Adekunle Ajason University, Akungba-Akoko.
Kalin, Laura (2022): Infixes really are (underlyingly) prefixes/suffixes: Evidence from allomorphy on the fine timing of infixation, Language98(4), 641–682..
Klavans, Judith (1985): The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization, Language61(1), 85–120..
(1995): On Clitics and Cliticization: The Interaction of Morphology, Phonology, and Syntax. New York Garland.
Legate, Julie Ann (2008): Warlpiri and the theory of second position clitics, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory26(2)..
Marantz, Alec (1988): Clitics, Morphological Merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In: M. Hammond & M. Noonan, eds., Theoretical morphology. San Diego: Brill Academic Press, pp. 253–270..
Merchant, Jason (2001): The syntax of silence: Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford University Press..
Migdalski, Krzysztof (2006): The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic. PhD thesis, Tillburg University.
Miller, Philip (1991): Edge Inflection on the French NP. In: Proceedings of the 27th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
(1992): Clitics and Constituents In Phrase Structure Grammar. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
Nikolaeva, Irina, Elena Perekhvalskaya & Maria Tolskaya (2002): Udihe folk tales. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Salzmann, Martin (2012): A derivational ellipsis approach to ATB-movement, The Linguistic Review29(3), 397–438..
Schwarzer, Luise (2022): Determiner Sharing in German – An Argument for Movement-Based Approaches to Ellipsis. PhD thesis, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig.
Stegen, Oliver (2011): In quest of a vernacular writing style for the Rangi of Tanzania: Assumptions, processes, challenges. PhD thesis, University of Edingburgh.
van den Berg, Helma (2004): Coordinating constructions in Daghestanian languages. In: M. Haspelmath, ed., Coordinating Constructions. John Benjamins, pp. 197–227..
Weisser, Philipp (2023): A two-step clitic placement algorithm in Khwarshi: Second Position placement as a repair for failed head-anchoring. In: S.-Y. Lam & S. Ozaki, eds., Proceedings of NELS 53. pp. 183–193.
(2024): ‘A typology of Shifted Coordinators and what they tell us about clitics and their formal modelling’. Habilitation Thesis: Universität Leipzig.
(2025): Alternations between second and final position of conjunctions and a general theory of second position placement. In: D. Demiray, R. Liu & N. Segal, eds., Proceedings of NELS 55 (Yale).