Cover not available

Article published In: Italo-Romance Morphosyntax: Theoretical and empirical issues
Edited by Francesco Maria Ciconte and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistic Variation 26:1] 2026
► pp. 113–131

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Endangered Occitan varieties in Italy

Some microcontact effect on morphosyntax

 | University of Florence
Published online: 28 July 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.24076.ire
Abstract
This paper focuses on the Occitan varieties spoken in Italy from the perspective of language contact. The study investigates the Gallo-Romance colony of Guardia Piemontese (Calabria), examining this minority and endangered language. The methodology involves comparing data from two corpora, representing opposite ends of the continuum between a stable, conservative stage (older generation) and a stage involving younger speakers with strongly influenced by Italian. Current measures of language endangerment typically rely on external factors such as intergenerational language transmission, number of speakers, and linguistic domains of use. To explore changes in the internal structure of endangered languages, this study examines two marked syntactic structures: subject clitics and negation. The comparison aims to verify the mechanisms of “microcontact” and assess the stability of the morphosyntactic structures under external pressures.
Article outline
  • 1.Assessing endangerment: External vs. internal factors of language contact and change
  • 2.Languages considered and “microcontact”: Theoretical and methodological approaches
  • 3.Subject clitics
  • 4.Sentential negation
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2001. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1988. Centre and periphery adoption, diffusion and spread. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology, 39–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1994. Syntactic variation. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1987. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias, Arienne M. Dwyer, Tjeerd de Graaf, Colette Grinevald, Michael Krauss, Osahito Miyaoka, Nicholas Ostler, Osamu Sakiyama, María E. Villalón, Akira Y. Yamamoto & Ofelia Zepeda (eds.). 2003. Language vitality and endangerment UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on Endangered Languages. Paris: UNESCO publishing. [URL] (13 June, 2024).
Canagarajah, Suresh A. 2008. Language shift and the family: Questions from the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Journal of Sociolinguistics 121. 143–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Alberto Frasson. 2019. Cambiamenti nell’uso dei soggetti clitici veneti: il ruolo del contatto con l’italiano. In Annamaria Chilà & Alessandro De Angelis (eds.), Capitoli di morfosintassi delle varietà romanze d’Italia: teoria e dati empirici, 117–133. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao Lan. 2009. Visible and invisible language planning: Ideological factor in the family language policy of Chinese immigrant families in Quebec. Language Policy 8(4). 351–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2015. Microcontact. Language variation and change from the Italian heritage perspective. ERC project. [URL]
. 2018. Microcontact, what it is and what it does. UiL-OTS Colloquium, Utrecht University, 15 March 2018.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Syntactic change in contact: Romance. Annual Review of Linguistics, 71. 309–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia. 2023. German and Romance varieties in contact in northeastern Italy. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 15 (Special issue). 80–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024a. Sociolinguistic typology and language contact in Northern Italy. In Hans-Bianchi, Barbara, Truppi, Chiara and Vogt, Barbara (eds). Speakers and Structures in Language Contact: Pluralistic Approaches to Change and Variation, 199–224. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024b. Documentazione linguistica e ultimi parlanti: l’esperienza con i dialetti walser. Ethnorêma 201. 17–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Bot, Kees. 2000. Language use as an interface between sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic processes in language attribution and language shift. In Jetske Klatter-Folmer & Piet van Avermaet (eds.), Theories on Maintenance and Loss of Minority Languages. Toward a More Integrated Explanatory framework, 65–81. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Giacomo, Giovanni. 1902. Novelletta provenzale. La Calabria. Rivista di letteratura popolare, XIV 5. 37–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, Norman. 1977. Language death or language suicide? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121. 13–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1993. Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: doubts about dichotomy. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 131–155. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. The study of language obsolescence: stages, surprises, challenges. Langues et Linguistique. Languages and Linguistics 31. 99–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977. The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. Linguistics, 1911. 23–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1996. Language death. In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Towards a Critical Sociolinguistics, 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1964. Diglossia. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Language in Culture and Society, 425–439. New York: Harper International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria. 2017. Segnali di contatto. Italiano e ladino nelle valli del Trentino-Alto Adige. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Sociolinguistica delle minoranze in Italia. Un’introduzione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Raymond G. 2005. (ed.), Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 15th edition. Dallas: SIL International. [URL] (13 June, 2024).
Grassi, Corrado. 1957. Per una storia delle vicende culturali e sociali di Guardia Piemontese ricostruite attraverso la sua parlata attuale. Bollettino della Società di Studi Valdesi, 1011. 71–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iannàccaro, Gabriele & Dell’Aquila, Vittorio. 2011. Historical linguistic minorities: Suggestions for classification and typology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2101. 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köpke, Barbara. 2004. Attrition is not a unitary phenomenon: on different possible outcomes of language contact situations. In Anxo M. L. Suarez, Fernando Ramallo & Xoán P. Rodiguez-Yanez (eds.), Bilingual socialization and bilingual language acquisition, 1331–1347. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. The social motivation of a sound change. In William Labov (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns, 1–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, & Gary F. Simons. 2010. Assessing endangerment: expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 55 (2). 103–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2005. Italian and Romance dialects. Generative morphosyntax, vols. I-II-III. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Micali, Irene. 2014. Guardia Piemontese: isola occitana in Calabria. Un’indagine sociolinguistica. University of Florence: PhD. Dissertation.
. 2016. L’occitano di Guardia Piemontese tra conservazione, innovazione e mutamento: analisi di un corpus. Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies 21. 175–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. L’occitano di Guardia Piemontese tra lingua e identità. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A. 2015. Language attrition and heritage language reversal. Journal of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences 141. 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1998. A Way to Dusty Death: the Matrix Language Turnover Hypothesis. Chapter. In Lenore A. Grenoble & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response, 289–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 1993. Subject syntax in northern Italian dialects. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India. Berkekey: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regis, Riccardo. 2006. The subject clitic pronouns in the western Piedmont. LIDI. Languages and Idioms of Italy 11. 55–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Profilo dell’occitano in Piemonte: aspetti sociolinguistici. Estudis Romànics 421. 101–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo & Laura Vanelli. 1983. Subject pronouns in some Romance varieties. In Paola Benincà, Manlio Cortelazzo, Aldo L. Prosdocimi, Laura Vanelli, Lorenzo Renzi & Alberto Zamboni (eds.), Scritti linguistici in onore di G. B. Pellegrini, 11. 121–145. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1995. Internal vs. external factors in socio-historical explanations of change: a fruitless dichotomy? Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 21 (1). 478–490. Berkeley: BLS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in north-west Melanesia. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon, Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance (eds.), 134–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1992. Theory of language death. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language Death: Factual and Theoretical Explorations with Special Reference to East Africa, 7–30. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savoia, Leonardo Maria & Maria Rita Manzini. 2010. Les clitiques sujets dans les variétés occitanes et francoprovençales italiennes. Corpus 91. 165–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalan, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11. 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. 2012. Family language policy–the critical domain. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 33 (1). 3–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Terence Kaufman. 1988. Language Contact: Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah. 2000. Contact Languages. An Introduction. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toso, Fiorenzo. 2008. Le minoranze linguistiche in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1989. Contact and isolation in linguistic change. In Leiv Egil Breivik & Ernst Hakon Jahr (eds.), Language Change. Contributions to the Study of its Causes, 227–238. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M. & Antonella Sorace. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performances in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In David Bamman, Tatiana Magnitskaia & Colleen Zaller (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 653–664. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNESCO 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. [URL] (13 Giugno, 2024).
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue