Cover not available

Article published In: Italo-Romance Morphosyntax: Theoretical and empirical issues
Edited by Francesco Maria Ciconte and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistic Variation 26:1] 2026
► pp. 203220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (38)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 21, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Clefts and wh in situ: some notes. Paper presented at the Lisbon COST-Meeting. July 6–8, 2006. Ms.
Boeckx, Cedric. 1999. Decomposing French questions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6(1). 69–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonan, Caterina. 2019. On clause-internally moved wh-phrases: Wh-to-foc, nominative clitics, and the theory of Northern Italian wh-in situ. Geneva: University of Geneva dissertation.
Boucher, Paul. 2010. Wh-questions in French and English. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, 101–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brocherel, Jules. 1958. Le patois et la langue Française en Vallée d’Aoste. Neuchâtel: Attinger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavalli, Marisa & Daniela Coletta. 2003. Langues, bilingualisme et représentations sociales au Val d’Aoste. Aosta: Istituto Regionale di Ricerca Educativa della Valle d’Aosta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Lisa. 1997. Wh-in-situ phenomena in French. Vancouver: University of British Columbia dissertation.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken romance languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. 2001. Parasitic gaps: A brief history. In Peter W. Culicover & Paul M. Postal (eds.), Prasitic gaps, 3–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26(4). 475–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1983. Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1996. Question-word movement to focus and scrambling in Malayalam. Linguistic Analysis 261. 63–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2001. On wh-questions in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 46(1–2). 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kato, Mary Aizawa. 2003. The interpretation and derivation of wh-in-situ constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. UNICAMP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Deriving “wh-in-situ” through movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Victoria Camacho-Taboada, L. Jiménez-Fernández Ángel, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 175–192. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2019. Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in situ in French. In Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt & Mareike Neuhaus (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, selected papers from ’Going Romance’ 30, Frankfurt, vol. 151, 113–130. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move-alpha: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 1999. Wh in situ and the intervention effect. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 111. 441–472.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The mapping of form and interpretation: The case of optional WH-movement in French. Lingua 114(9–10). 1090–1132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto. 2023. Towards a typology of wh-doubling in Northern Italian Dialects. Languages 8(1). 24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 1993. A geographic analysis of the origins of Faetar. The Penn Review of Linguistics 171. 177–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Language contact and language change in the Faetar speech community. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Interface Explorations 91. 343–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Special interrogatives-left periphery, wh-doubling, and (apparently) optional elements. In Jenny Doetjes & Paz Gonzàle (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2004: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Leiden, 9–11 December 2004, 247–273. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. Radical Pragmatics, 223–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2019. Actual and apparent change in Brazilian Portuguese wh- interrogatives. Language Variation and Change 31(2). 165–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi-Gensane, Nathalie & Biagio Ursi. 2020. Syntaxe et genre interactionnel: Le cas des interrogatives directes partielles dans les interactions commerciales. Langages 3(219). 147–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seguin, Luisa. 2025a. Chain realization and overt-covert movement in Valdôtain Patois. University of Maryland College Park dissertation.
. 2025b. Choose me! Optionality in wh-movement and PF copy deletion: Evidence for overt-covert movement in Valdôtain Patois. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 101. 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. in press. The (in)compatibility of wh and focus in root and embedded questions in Romance and beyond. In Sam Wolfe (ed.), The Handbook of Syntactic Cartography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spina, Stefania. 2014. Perugia Corpus: Una risorsa di riferimento per l’italiano. Composizione, annotazione e valutazione. In Roberto Basili, Alessandro Lenci & Bernardo Magnini (eds.), Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiCit, 354–359. Pisa: Pisa University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuaillon, Gaston. 1992. Histoire des situations linguistiques le long de la frontière franco-italienne. Nouvelles du Centre d’Études Francoprovençales René Willien 251. 5–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and clausal structure: a comparative study of romance languages (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue