Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Variation
Vol. 24:1 (2024) ► pp.116–163

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Indeterminate pronouns in Kaqchikel

 | University of Kansas
 | University of California Los Angeles
 | University of Toronto
Published online: 12 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22012.dun
Abstract
This paper investigates the morphology, syntax, and semantics of five non-interrogative constructions that involve wh-expressions in Kaqchikel, a Mayan language of the K’ichean branch spoken in Guatemala. We focus on the properties of maximal free relative clauses, existential free relative clauses, ever free relative clauses, free choice items and negative indefinites. We show that the interpretive properties of these constructions are strikingly similar to those found in a number of unrelated languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on Kaqchikel and Data Collection
  • 3.Wh-Questions and Wh-Words
  • 4.Relative Clauses
    • 4.1Types of relative clauses
    • 4.2Argument and locative free relatives
    • 4.3PP free relatives
    • 4.4how free relatives
    • 4.5when free relatives
    • 4.6why free relatives
    • 4.7how many free relatives
  • 5.The interpretation of free relatives in Kaqchikel
    • 5.1Maximal free relatives
    • 5.2Existential free relatives
    • 5.3Free-choice free relatives
  • 6.Wh-words in complex indefinite expressions
    • 6.1Free choice items
    • 6.2Negative indefinite construction
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (85)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 1992. “Definiteness, existentials, and the ‘list’ interpretation. Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 2. Chris Barker and David Dowty (eds.), pp. 1–16. Columbus, Ohio: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “A pragmatic account of the definitenesseffect in existential sentences”. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 191, pp. 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1992. “Topic and focus in Mayan.” Language, 681, pp. 43–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Pied piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 141, pp.447–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil”. Language 75(3), 451–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
AnderBois, Scott, Miguel Oscar Chan Dzul, Jessica Coon, and Juan Jesús Vázquez. 2019. “Relativas Libres en Ch’ol y Maya Yucateco Y La Tipología de Cláusulas Relativas Sin Núcleo”. Proceedings of Form and Analysis in Mayan Linguistics, 51. [URL]
Babby, Leonard. 1980. Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2019. “La tensión vocálica en el kaqchikel de Sololá, Guatemala: un studio preliminar.” In, eds. Esther Herrera Zendejas and Verónica Reyes Taboada, eds., Fonología segmental: procesos e interacciones, pp.13–46. Mexico City, Mexico: Colégio de México. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan and Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. “The Syntax of Free Relatives in English”. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 9, num. 3, pp. 331–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron. 2000. “Word Order and Markedness in Kaqchikel”. In, Proceedings of the LFG00 Conference, Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds). Available at: [URL]
. 2001. “Optimal order and pied-piping in San Dionicio Zapotec.” In Formal and empirical issues in optimality theoretic syntax. Peter Sells (ed.), pp. 197–224. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron, and Lachlan Duncan. 2002. “A new passive in Kaqchikel.” Linguistic Discovery, 1(2), pp. 26–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. McKenna, J. Maxwell, and W. E. Little. 2006. La Ütz Awäch? An Introduction to Kaqchikel Maya Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buell, Leston. 2011. “Zulu ngani ‘why’: Postverbal and yet in CP.” Lingua, 1211, pp. 805–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1977. Quichean Linguistic Prehistory. University of California, Publications in Linguistics, Vol. 811. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Can Pixabaj, Telma A. 2015. Complement and Purpose Clauses in K’iche’. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Cross-linguistically. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2004. “The semantic contribution of wh-words and type-shifts: Evidence from free relatives crosslinguistically.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, Robert B. Young (ed.), pp. 38–55. Ithaca, New York: CLCPublications, Cornell University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano and Anamaria Fălăuş. 2018. “Free Choice Free Relative Clauses in Italian and Romanian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 36(2): 323–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano. 2021. “Introducing Headless Relative Clauses and the findings from Mesoamerican Languages.” In Ivano Caponigro, Harold Torrence, and Roberto Zavala, eds., Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano, Harold Torrence, Roberto Zavala (eds.). 2021. Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. 1978. “Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions.” In, J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik, eds., Universals of human language, Vol. 4, pp. 85–126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-Questions. PhD Dissertation. MIT.
. 1997. On the Typology of Wh-Questions. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen and Anastasia Giannakidou. 2005. “The Non Uniformity of Wh-Indeterminates With Free Choice in Chinese.” Quantificational Structures, Kook-hee Gil and George Tsoulas (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren, and Jessica Coon. 2018. “Deriving verb-initial word order in Mayan.” Language, 94, 2: 237–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Christopher. 1991. “Why and How Come.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2009. “Interrogative Possessors and the Problem with Pied-Piping in Chol.” Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 1: 165–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1997. “Free relatives and ever: Identity and free choice readings.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 71, pp. 99–116. Ithaca, New York: CLC Publications Cornell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “ANY as Inherently Modal.” Linguistics & Philosophy 211, pp. 433–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Licensing by Modification.” Ilha Do Desterro, N° 47, pp. 217–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
England, Nora C. 1991. “Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages.” International Journal of American Linguistics, 57, 4: 446–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Plurality Agreement in Some Eastern Mayan Languages”. International Journal of American Linguistics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 397–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2000. “Whatever.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 101, pp. 27–39. Ithaca, New York: CLC Publications Cornell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Matzar, Pedro and José Obispo Rodríguez Guaján. 1997. Rukemik ri Kaqchikel Chi’: Gramática Kaqchikel. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Editorial CHOLSAMAJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. “The Meaning of Free Choice.” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 241, pp. 659–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guarcax González, José Celestino. 2016. Las cláusulas relativas en el kaqchikel de Sololá. Master’s thesis, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.
Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three Studies in Locality and Case. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “The syntax-semantics of modal existential wh-constructions.” Balkan Syntax and Semantics, Olga Mišeska Tomić (ed.), pp. 405–438. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander and Fred Landman. 1998. “Strange Relatives of the Third Kind.” Natural Language Semantics, 61, pp. 125–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2012. “Relative clauses in Yucatec Maya: Light heads vs. Null domain”. Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas.: A typological overview. Bernard Comrie and Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.). pp. 253–268. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo. 2013. “Free relative clauses in Yucatec Maya.” Language Typology and Universals (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung/STUF, vol. 661, pp. 22–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo. 2015. Las Claúsulas Relativas en Maya Yucateco. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina. 2017. A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Heaton, Raina, Kamil Deen, and William O’Grady. 2016. “The status of syntactic ergativity in Kaqchikel.” Lingua, 1701, pp. 35–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert. 2007. “Observations on the syntax of adjunct extraction in Kaqchikel”. Proceedings of the Congress on Indigenous Languages of Latin America-III. Accessed 1/15/15: [URL]
Henderson, Robert and Jessica Coon. 2018. “Adverbs and variability in Kaqchikel Agent Focus”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 361, pp. 149–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 2000. “Pick a theory: not just any theory.” Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, L. Horn and Y. Kato (eds.), pp. 147–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2018. Características generales de la población. Censo 2018. Censo Nacional XII de La Población y VII de Vivienda. República de Guatemala. Accessed on May 1, 2023: [URL]
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1998. Non-indicative wh-complements of possessive and existential predicates. In Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds.), NELS 28: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 159–173. Amherst, MAAmherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Free adjunct free relatives”. Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 19), Roger Billerey and Brook Lillehaugen (eds), pp. 232–245. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason and Harold Torrence. 2011. How Why is Different: Wh- in-situ in Krachi. Snippets 231: 5–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Sok-Ju. 2011. “Word Order Variables in Patzun Kaqchikel.” Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 321, pp. 120–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika and Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese. Paper presented at the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. March 2002.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in The Japanese Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Larson, Richard. 1987. ““Missing Prepositions” and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, num. 2, pp. 239–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. “The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: a lattic-theoretica approach.” Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), pp. 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. “On the Methodology of Semantic Fieldwork”. International Journal of American Linguistics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 369–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1992. An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
. 2011. “Existential Sentences.” Semantics: an International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 21, pp. 1829–1848. C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
. 1977. “Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English”. Linguistic Analysis, 31, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 2017. “The Mesoamerican linguistic area revisited." In Karen Dakin, Claudia Parodi, & Natalie Operstein (eds.), Langauge Contact and Change from Mesoamerica and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 335–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patal Majzul, Filiberto, Lolmay Pedro Oscar Garcia Matzar and Ixchel Carmelina Espantzay Serech. 2000. Rujunamaxik ri Kaqchikel Chi’: Variación Dialectal en Kaqchikel. Guatemala City, Guatemala: CHOLSAMAJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (In)Definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 98–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawlins, Kyle. 2008. (Un)conditionals: an investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditionalstructures. Ph.D. dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2005. Free relatives: A syntactic case study. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics 61: 29–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the Position Int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the Clause. In Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royer, Justin. 2021. “Headless Relative Clauses in Chuj”. Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican Languages, Ivano Caponigro, Harold Torrence, Roberto Zavala (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the Semantics of WH-Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Shlonsky, Ur and Gabriela Soare. 2011. Where’s ‘why’?. Linguistic Inquiry 421: 651–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek. 2011. Modal Existential wh-Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, Holland; published by LOT – Netherland Graduate School of Linguistics ([URL]).
Šimík, Radek. 2018. “Free relatives”. Draft to appear in Semantics Companion, Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann, and Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith Stark, Thomas. 1988. “‘Pied-piping’ con inversion en preguntas parciales.” Ms. Centro de estudios lingüísticos y literarios, Colegio de México y Seminario de lenguas indígenas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2006. “Agent focus in Mayan languages”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 241, 501–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2003a. “On the Syntax and Semantics of Content Questions in Yucatec Maya”. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on American Indian Languages (WAIL) Castillo, J. (ed.), Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 141, 106–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. “F-constructions in Yucatec Maya”. The Proceedings of SULA 2. Jan Andersson, Paula Ménendez-Benito, Adam Werle (eds.). pp. 203–223. Amherst, Massachusetts: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tredinnick, Victoria. 2005. On the Semantics of Free Relatives with –ever. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Tummons, Emily. 2010. Positional Roots in Kaqchikel Maya. Master’s thesis, University of Kansas.
Vlachou, Evangelia. 2007. Free Choice in and out of Context: Semantics and Distribution of French, Greek and English free choice items. Ph.D. dissertation, LOT.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue