Cover not available

Article published In: Partitives cross-linguistically: Dimensions of variation
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Petra Sleeman
[Linguistic Variation 23:1] 2023
► pp. 217–243

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Partitive pronouns in intransitive contexts in Italian and Dutch

ORCiD logo with link | University of Amsterdam
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Amsterdam.

Published online: 27 January 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21018.sle
Abstract
In the literature it is often assumed that partitive pronouns can only be used in combination with elliptical objects of transitive or unaccusative verbs. Some counterevidence has been provided as well, however, showing that partitive pronouns may also occur with intransitive verbs. In this paper it is investigated, by means of a Grammaticality Judgment Task, if native speakers of Italian and Dutch accept the use of the partitive pronoun with three types of intransitive verbs, in combination with an elliptical quantified adverbial NP. It is shown that both groups of participants were quite ready to accept the partitive pronoun in these cases, in some contexts more than in others. Various explanations for the results are considered and one more specific suggestion is made to account for the data, also based on a comparison with other constructions and other languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Constraints on the use of the partitive pronoun
    • 2.1Italian
    • 2.2Dutch
  • 3.Research questions, hypotheses and methodology
    • 3.1Research questions and hypotheses
    • 3.2Test materials
    • 3.3Participants
    • 3.4Procedure and analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Judgments of the non-coordinated sentences
    • 4.2Judgments of the contrastive coordinated sentences
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Barbiers, Sjef. 2017. Kwantitatief er en ze. Nederlandse Taalkunde 22(2). 163–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1981. The syntax of “NE”. Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1(2). 117–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1988. L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. In Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 11, 115–227. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans. 1986. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia. 2004. Ne-cliticisation and split intransitivity. Journal of Linguistics 40(2). 219–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, Alied. 1977. Het kwantitatieve er. Spektator 61. 387–395.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 1992. Partitive ‘ne’ and the QP hypothesis. A case study. In Elisabetta Fava (ed.), Proceedings of the XVII Meeting of Generative Grammar, 122–141. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. In Henk van Riemsdijk & Martin Everaert (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 23–93. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Marjo van Koppen. 2018. Dutch. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 721–764. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elffers, Els, Sies de Haan & Ina Schermer. 2014. Het voltooid deelwoord in het Nederlands: beperkingen op het attributief gebruik. Nederlandse Taalkunde 19(1). 47–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman. 2021. Partitive elements in the languages of Europe: An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partititive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case, 1–30. (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse. 1989. Nouvelle grammaire française. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanse, Joseph. 1987. Nouveau dictionnaire des difficultés du français moderne (2nd revised edition). Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 171. 623–661.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1983. Personal vs. impersonal constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1). 141–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pino Serrano, Laura & Nuria Rodriguez Pedreira. 2016. Les accords du désaccord. Prédicats de mesure et objet(s). Lingvisticae Investigationes 39(1). 88–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvà, Sebastià. 2017. Past participle agreement in Majorcan Catalan: the relevance of inner aspect. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 6(1). 53–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra. Forthcoming. Partitive pronouns and quantified adverbial NPs: a labeling account. Bucharest University Press.
Stroik, Thomas. 1990. Adverbs as V-sisters. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 654–661.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen & Yae-Sheik Lee. 1996. The domain of direct case assignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14(3). 629–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Will, Kimberly Page. 2019. The semantic and pragmatic functions of partitive clitic NE in Italian. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University dissertation.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cornips, Leonie & Petra Sleeman
2024. Variation in the use of the partitive pronoun ER in regional (Heerlen) standard Dutch. Linguistic Variation 24:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra
2024. The Partitive Pronoun ER in Two National Varieties of Standard Dutch . In Partitive Constructions and Partitive Elements Within and Across Language Borders in Europe , DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra
2024. Methods for studying variation in partitives. Linguistic Variation 24:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue