Article published In: Linguistic Variation
Vol. 22:2 (2022) ► pp.209–267
Optional agreement as successful/failed Agree
Evidence from Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan)
Published online: 26 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20013.lys
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20013.lys
Abstract
We investigate optional predicate agreement in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan). Several generalizations emerge: (i) inanimate
arguments base-generated as complements control agreement optionally; (ii) some animate arguments base-generated as complements control
agreement optionally; (iii) all arguments base-generated as specifiers control full agreement obligatorily. We propose that two conditions
must be met for the operation Agree to succeed, resulting in the exponence of all the features of the agreement controller. First,
a goal must be visible (bear the right feature). Second, a goal must be accessible (be in the right structural position). If one or both
conditions are not met, Agree fails, but the derivation converges and 3sg agreement is exponed. While Agree is
deterministic, surface optionality arises when the operation fails. We use optional agreement to diagnose the syntactic structure of
understudied constructions in Mayan (nominalizations, Agent Focus). We discuss microvariation, highlighting methodological considerations
that arise when assuming an I-language approach.
Keywords: Agree, agreement, optionality, microvariation, specifier, complement, Agent Focus, Tz’utujil, Mayan, syntax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Santiago Tz’utujil
- 2.1Previous work on optional agreement in Tz’utujil
- 2.2Properties of STz’
- 3.Optional agreement in STz’: Establishing a specifier vs. completement generalization
- 3.1Agreement controlled by base-generated specifier
- 3.1.1Subject of transitives
- 3.1.2Subject of antipassives
- 3.1.3Possessor
- 3.1.4Subject of nominal and adjectival predicates
- 3.1.5Interim summary
- 3.2Agreement controlled by base-generated complement
- 3.2.1Object of transitives
- 3.2.2Subject of passives
- 3.2.3Argument in an existential construction
- 3.3A generalization regarding inanimate controllers
- 3.1Agreement controlled by base-generated specifier
- 4.Optional agreement as a diagnostic of underlying structure
- 4.1Intransitives
- 4.2Sole argument of stative predicates (revisited)
- 4.3Agent Focus (subjects and objects)
- 4.4The progressive construction
- 5.Animate controllers: Construction-specific pattern
- 6.Analysis
- 6.1Inanimate controllers: Visibility (structural size)
- 6.2Animate arguments: Construction-specific accessibility
- 6.2.1Accessibility and Set B agreement
- 6.2.2Accessibility and Set A agreement
- 6.2.3Pronouns revisited
- 6.3Summary of visibility and accessibility
- 7.Microvariation
- 7.1Microvariation across Mayan
- 7.2Microvariation in STz’ and a methodological note
- 8.Conclusions and future work
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- List of abbreviations used in the paper
References
References (92)
Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.
Aissen, Judith. 1999. External Possessor and Logical Subject in Tz’utujil. In I. Barshi & D. Payne (eds.), External Possession, 451–485. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2011. On the syntax of agent focus in K’ichee’. (Ed.) Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon. Proceedings of FAMLi. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
. 2017a. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), Oxford handbook of ergativity, 737–758. Oxford University Press.
. 2017b. Complement clauses. In Judith Aissen, Nora C. England & Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages, 259–292. New York, NY: Routledge.
Aissen, Judith, Nora C. England & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.). 2017a. The Mayan Languages. New York, NY: Routledge.
. 2017b. Introduction. In Judith Aissen, Nora C. England & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages. New York, NY: Routledge.
Aldridge, Edith Catherine. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Cornell University Doctoral dissertation.
Assmann, A., D. Georgi, F. Heck, G. Müller & P. Weisser. 2015. Ergatives move too early: On an instance of opacity in syntax. Syntax 18(4). 343–387.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2009. Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language. In Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds.), The expression of time in language, 83–128. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Carstens, Vicki. 2020. Concord and labeling. In Peter W. Smith (ed.), Agreement in the Minimalist Program (Language Sciences Press Open Generative Syntax Series).
. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. MIT Press.
Clemens, Lauren & Jessica Coon. 2018. Deriving verb-initial word order in Mayan. Language 94(2). 237–280.
. 2019. Building verbs in Chuj: Consequences for the nature of roots. Journal of Linguistics 551. 35–81.
Coon, Jessica, Nico Baier & Theodore Levin. 2021. Mayan Agent Focus and the ergative extraction constraint: Facts and fictions revisited. Language 97(2).
Coon, Jessica & E. Carolan. 2017. Nominalizations and the structure of progressives in Chuj Mayan. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1). 1–35.
Coon, Jessica, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Omer Preminger. 2014. The role of case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: Evidence from Mayan. Linguistic Variation 14(2). 179–242.
Coon, Jessica & Omer Preminger. 2009. Positional roots and case absorption. New perspectives in Mayan linguistics 35–58.
Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection.” Syntax 12(4). 285–323.
Douglas, J., Rodrigo Ranero & M. Sheehan. 2017. Two kinds of syntactic ergativity in Mayan. In Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine (ed.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI, vol. 21, 41–56. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Eberhard, D. M., G. F. Simons & C. D. Fenning (eds.). 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 22nd edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
England, Nora C. 1991. Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(4). 466–486.
2011. Plurality Agreement in Some Eastern Mayan Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(3). 397–412.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2016. Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2). 429–479.
Fried, Marisa, Paulina Lyskawa & Rodrigo Ranero. 2020. Agreement in K’iche’ (Mayan): Reflections on microvariation and acquisition. In To appear in Proceedings of the 44th Penn Linguistics Conference.
Hale, Kenneth. 2002. Eccentric agreement. In B. Fernández & Pablo Albizu (eds.), Kasu eta Komunztaduraren gainean [On Case and Agreement], 15–48. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Euskal Herriko Unibetsitatea.
Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford University Press.
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3). 482–526.
Haviland, John B. 1994. “Te xa setel xulem” [The buzzards were circling] – Categories of verbal roots in (Zinacantec) Tzotzil. Linguistics 321. 691–741.
Heaton, R. 2017. A typology of antipassives, with special reference to Mayan. Manoa: University of Hawai’i Doctoral dissertation.
. 2012. Morphological alternations at the intonational phrase edge. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(3). 741–787.
Imanishi. 2014. Default ergative. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.
Ionin, T. 2003. Article semantics in second language acquisition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.
2006. This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14(2). 175.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 506–515.
Levin, Theodore. 2015. Licensing without Case. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.
Levin, Theodore, Paulina Lyskawa & Rodrigo Ranero. 2020. Optional agreement in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan) is syntactic. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. De Gruyter Mouton 39(3). 329–355.
Little, Carol Rose. 2020a. Left branch extraction, object shift, and freezing effects in Tumbalá Ch’ol. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 5(1).
. 2020b. Interdependencies of nominal and clausal syntax: A view from Ch’ol. Cornell University Doctoral dissertation.
Lyskawa, Paulina & Rodrigo Ranero. 2021a. Vowel Harmony in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan). Handout presented at the Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas.
. 2021b. Sibilant harmony in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan). In Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 611, vol. 61, 265–279.
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (19). 153–197.
Mateo-Toledo, B’alam Eladio. 2008. The family of complex predicates in Q’anjob’al (Maya): Their syntax and meaning. Austin, TX: University of Texas Doctoral dissertation.
Norris, Mark. 2014. A theory of nominal concord. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. University of California, Santa Cruz Doctoral dissertation.
. 2017. Description and analyses of nominal concord (Parts I-II). Language and Linguistics Compass 11(11).
O-Brien Rothe, L. 2015. Songs that Make the Road Dance: Courtship and Fertility Music of the Tz’utujil Maya. University of Texas Press.
Ordóñez, F. 1995. The antipassive in Jacaltec: A last resort strategy. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics (CatWPL) 4(2). 329–343.
Polinsky, Maria. 2016. Deconstructing ergativity: Two types of ergative languages and their features. Oxford University Press.
. 2017. Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Postal, Paul. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In F. Dinneen (ed.), 19th Monograph on Languages and Linguistics, 201–224. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs). Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London, England: The MIT Press.
Ranero, Rodrigo. 2021. Identity Conditions on Ellipsis. University of Maryland, College Park Doctoral Dissertation.
Royer, Justin. 2021. Prosody as syntactic evidence: The view from Mayan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 131, 258–275. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Stiebels, B. 2006. Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(2). 501–570.
Tada, H. 1993. A/A-bar partition in derivation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral dissertation.
Thráinsson, H. 2001. Object Shift and Scrambling. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 149–202. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tummons, E. J. 2010. Positional Roots in Kaqchikel Maya. University of Kansas Masters thesis.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Burukina, Irina & Maria Polinsky
Kovač, Iva & Gert-Jan Thomas Schoenmakers
Polinsky, Maria
Burukina, Irina
2023. On the syntax of postpositional phrasesin Mari. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
