Cover not available

Article published In: Variation in phonology
Edited by Péter Szigetvári
[Linguistic Variation 20:1] 2020
► pp. 56–83

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Special issue article

Neutralisation and contrast preservation

Voicing assimilation in Hungarian three-consonant clusters

 | The Open University | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 | Eötvös Loránd University
Published online: 9 January 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16010.bar
Abstract
This paper studies the contextual variation in the voicing properties of three-consonant clusters (CC#C) in Hungarian. We investigate the velar+alveolar stop clusters /kt/ and /ɡd/, and the alveolar fricative+stop clusters /st/ and /zd/ in potentially voicing-neutralising and assimilating contexts. We show that in these contexts, regressive voicing assimilation in Hungarian is categorical, but partially contrast preserving, and that stops and fricatives are not affected in the same way. Fricatives resist voicing before a voiced obstruent and are devoiced utterance-finally. This is a phonetically unfavourable position, therefore other duration-related cues step up to prevent complete laryngeal neutralisation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment: Material, procedure, statistical analysis
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Utterance-final position
    • 3.2Intervocalic and pre-sonorant position
    • 3.3Voicing assimilation in three-consonant clusters
      • 3.3.1Assimilation of voicelessness before /p/
      • 3.3.2Assimilation of voicing before /b/
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (53)
References
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády. 2012. The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, 18–21 January, 2012, Berlin.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss. 2015. Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak? In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 65–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán Kiss. 2007. A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of [v]: A case study from Hungarian and Slovak. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology, 18–21 January, 2007, Rhodes, Greece.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version 5.3.12) [Computer program]. Retrieved from [URL]
Burton, Martha & Karen Robblee. 1997. A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 251. 97–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan. 1985. Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics 131. 309–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralization. Phonetica 501. 28–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2000. Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Jan Charles-Luce. 1984. Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation, and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 121. 49–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoe Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Gregory Iverson. 1984. On the ‘incomplete neutralization’ of German final obstruents. Phonetica 411. 140–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka. 2010. A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some characteristics of the voicing contrast of fricatives]. In Mária Gósy (ed.) Beszédkutatás 2010 [Speech research 2010]. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet. 42–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1970. Some generalizations concerning glottalic consonants, especially implosives. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(2). 123–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallé, Pierre A. & Martine Adda-Decker. 2011. Voice assimilation in French obstruents: Categorical or gradient? In John Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels (eds.) Tone and features: A festschrift for Nick Clements. Berlin & New York: Mouten De Gruyter. 149–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanson, Helen M., Richard S. McGowan, Kenneth N. Stevens and Robert E. Beaudoin. 1999. Development of rules for controlling the HLsyn speech synthesizer. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings, vol. 11. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 85–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatly (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. vol. 11. 243–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Donca Steriade. 2004. The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In Bruce Hayes, Robert M. Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
HLSyn (High Level Speech Synthesizer) Reference Manual. 1999. Sensimetrics Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Philip J. B. & Christine H. Shadle. 2000. Frication noise modulated by voicing, as revealed by pitch-scaled decomposition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(4). 1421–1434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, Wouter. 2004. Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor & Lutoslawa Richter. 1989. Neutralisation of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 171. 317–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Javkin, Hector R. 1976. The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, UC Berkeley 11. 78–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahlen-Halstenbach, Birthe. 1990. Zur psychologischen Realität der Auslautverhartung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für phonetische Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 431. 645–655.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 701. 419–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluender, Keith R., Randy L. Diehl & Beverly A. Wright. 1988. Vowel length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics 161. 153–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per Bruun Brockhoff & Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen. 2016. lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–32. [URL]
Mády, Katalin & Zsuzsanna Bárkányi. 2015. Voicing assimilation at accentual phrase boundaries in Hungarian. In Maria Wolters, Judy Livingstone, Bernie Beattie, Rachel Smith, Mike MacMahon, Jane Stuart-Smith & Jim Scobbie (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow. 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markó, Alexandra, Tekla Etelka Gráczi & Judit Bóna. 2010. The realisation of voicing assimilation rules in Hungarian spontaneous and read speech: Case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 571. 210–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W. & Michael M. Cohen. 1983. Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 331. 502–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2012. Final devoicing: Production and perception studies. In Tony Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.) Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. London: Equinox Press. 148–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Dell, Michael & Port, Robert F. 1983. Discrimination of word final voicing in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 731. Supplement 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter MacNeilage (ed.) The production of speech. New York: Springer. 189–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl & Keith R. Kluender. 1986. Trading relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and Psychophysics 391. 129–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby. 1982. C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 21. 141–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary. 2005. Against formal phonology. Language 811. 927–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Port, Robert F., Fares Mitleb & Michael O’Dell. 1981. Neutralization of obstruent voicing in German is incomplete. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 701. Supplement 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [URL]
Schmidt, Lauren B. & Erik W. Willis. 2011. Systematic investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish /s/ in Mexico City. In Scott M. Alvord (ed.) Selected proceedings of the 5th conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Daniel A. Dinnsen. 1985. On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 131. 325–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Helena J. Szymanska. 1989. Perception of word-final devoicing in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 171. 205–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Manuscript. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Sharon Inkelas & Kristin Hanson (eds.) The nature of the word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 151–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2012. Phonetics – phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Ellen Simon. 2013. Obstruent voice before sonorants. The case of West-Flemish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Available online. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vago, Robert M. 1980. The Sound Pattern of Hungarian. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, John Christopher. 2000. Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2001. Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In Elizabeth Hume & Keith Johnson (eds.) The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. 251–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Bruce Hayes, Robert M. Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zsigri, Gyula. 1994. Magyar mássalhangzószabályok. [Rules for Hungarian consonants]. Doctoral dissertation. József Attila University (JATE), Szeged. (Published by JATE Press, Szeged, 2006.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kim, Yeong-Joon
2025. Correspondence at the acoustic boundaries: cluster simplification, syncope and P-map correspondence constraints. Phonology 42 DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2021. The perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in minimal pairs: evidence from Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 68:1-2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2023. Production and perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in Hungarian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue