Cover not available

Article published In: Variation in C: Comparative approaches to the Complementizer Phrase
Edited by Jacopo Garzonio and Silvia Rossi
[Linguistic Variation 18:2] 2018
► pp. 336–358

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Speaker-oriented syntax and root clause complementizers

 | University of Vienna
 | University of Vienna
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16009.cru
Abstract
The object of study of this paper is a Romance construction characterized by the presence of the complementizer in root clauses and by an evidential or epistemic meaning (i.e. C-constructions). In these structures, the complementizer is preceded by a functional element that morphologically coincides with an adjective or an adverb. From a morphosyntactic viewpoint, we show that these structures are monoclausal and that the epistemic or evidential item preceding the complementizer has undergone a process of grammaticalization becoming a functional element. As for their use and interpretation, we describe their primary semantic meaning, as well as their pragmatic extensions and functions, which involve subjectification and intersubjectivity. We finally propose a syntactic configuration that can account for C-constructions and their properties in the syntax representation. This configuration involves the assumption of a projection – in fact, a set of projections – above ForceP which encode speaker-oriented and pragmatic features (e.g. evaluative, evidential, epistemic values).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Monoclausality and root complementation
    • 2.1Against the copula-omission analysis
    • 2.2Syntactic distribution and the position of the complementizer
  • 3.The functional element preceding the complementizer
    • 3.1Subjective vs. objective readings
    • 3.2Beyond subjectivity: The interpretation of C-constructions with an anaphoric CP
  • 4.Discourse-oriented syntax and emphasis
  • 5.Conclusions and final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon?. Iberia 2(1). 43.88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Danielle Godard. 2007. Quelle syntaxe, incidemment, pour les adverbes incidents? Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris CII1. 255–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breitbath, Anne, Karen De Clercq & Liliane Haegeman (eds.). 2013. Polarity emphasis: distribution and locus of licensing (Special Issue of Lingua 128).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calaresu, Emilia. 2004. Testuali parole. La dimensione pragmatica e testuale del discorso riportato. Pavia: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colasanti, Valentina & Giuseppina Silvestri. 2019. Matrix complementizers in Italo-Romance. In Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Italian dialectology at the interfaces, 155–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corr, Alice. 2016. Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CREA – Real Academia española: Banco de datos (CREA) [online]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. [URL] (20 December 2014).
Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. Tra dire e pensare: Casi di grammaticalizzazione in italiano e in siciliano. La Lingua Italiana: Storia, Strutture, Testi 71. 105–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The expression of evidentiality and epistemicity: Cases of grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus 271. 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2008. Hearsay and reported speech: Evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 331. 95–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Before the complementizer: Adverb types and root clause modification. In: Martin Hummel & Salvador Valera (eds.), Adjective-adverb interfaces in Romance, 81–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Olga Fernández Soriano. 2014. Evidentiality and illocutionary force. Spanish matrix que at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In Andreas Dufter & Álvaro O. de Toledo (eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist, and typological perspectives, 217–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Tasmowski, Liliane. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 339–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 1997. The grammatical representation of speech events. PhD dissertation, Maryland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On quotative constructions in Iberian Spanish. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 35–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua 1201. 604–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo & Poletto Cecilia. 2015. On polarity particles in Italian varieties. In Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax, 211–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the speaker. Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, Montserrat. 2014. Evidentiality, intersubjectivity and salience in Spanish and Catalan markers claro/clar and la verdad/veritat . Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3). 409–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse. 2008. Le bon usage (14th ed.). Brussels: De Boeck & Larcier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2001. Spanish exclamatives and the semantics of the left periphery. In Johan Rooryck, Yves de Hulst & Jan Schroten (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 1999: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 99 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 221), 167–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Spanish root exclamatives at the syntax/semantics Interface. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 71. 117–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa. 2007. From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and si in Spanish. In Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández Soriano (eds.), Coreference, modality, and focus: Studies on the syntax-semantics interface, 133–169. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia. 2007. Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 241. 61–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Main clause că ‘that’ in Romanian. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2). 5–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. A main clause complementizer. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 279–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Nicola Munaro. 2015. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax, 41–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman. 1992. Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 41. 112–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kocher, Anna. 2014. Claro que son adverbios: Análisis de un proceso de gramaticalización. MA thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. Hans J. Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser, (eds.), Worlds, words, and contexts, 38–74. De Gruyter, Berlin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2013. Response particles as propositional anaphors. Proceedings of SALT 231. 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
La Repubblica – Corpus. [URL] (31 January 2015).
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya. 2015. Epistemic/evidential markers of the type verb + complementizer. Some parallels from English and Romance. In Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research, 93–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzetti, Luca. 2002. Sulla grammaticalizzazione di dice nell’italiano parlato. In Sabine Heinemann, Gerald Bernhard & Dieter Kattenbusch (eds.), Roma et Romania. Festschrift für Gerhard Ernst zum 65. Geburtstag, 211–221. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinier, Christian & Françoise Levrier. 2000. Grammaire des adverbs. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola. 2019. On the syntactic encoding of lexical interjections in Italo-Romance. In Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Italian dialectology at the interfaces, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NGLE – Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española, 21 Vols. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir Aleksandrovič. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Studies in Language 12(1). 349–357.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Raffaella Zanuttini. 2013. Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/no che sentences. Lingua 1281. 124–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2013. The complementiser system in spoken English: Evidence from broadcast media. In María Victoria Camacho Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 11–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 341. 411–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, volume 31, 223–251. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Espiñeira, María José. 2014. Emergencia e historia de la construcción es capaz que . In Maria Bargalló Escrivà, María del Pilar Garcés Gómez & Cecilio Garriga Escribano (eds.), Llaneza. Estudios ofrecidos a Juan Gutiérrez Cuadrado, 205–218. A Coruña: Anexo de la Revista de Lexicografía.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Chung-hye Han. 2004. On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5). 609–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 11. 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Servidio, Emilio. 2014. Polarity particles in Italian: Focus, fragments, tags. Doctoral dissertation, University of Siena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Avel·lina & Àngela Di Tullio. 2014. Bare adjectives as syncretic forms. Borealis 3(1). 23–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir Aleksandrovič. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories. Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: at the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(3). 39–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cruschina, Silvio
2023. L’espressione dell’epistemicità e dell’evidenzialità in siciliano. Gli avverbi in -ca . Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
LÉGER, Catherine, Marcus LUNGUINHO & Patrícia RODRIGUES
2021. VER EM FRANCÊS ACADIANO E PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO: CODIFICAÇÃO DE IMPERATIVO E SALIÊNCIA TEXTUAL. Alfa: Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 65 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue