Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:1 (2015) ► pp.69–115

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The illusion of the NP/DP divide

Evidence from Lithuanian

Published online: 21 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.1.03gil
In this paper, we present syntactic and semantic arguments that, in at least one articleless language (Lithuanian), bare nouns are able to project either NP or DP structures (cf. Franks & Pereltsvaig 2004; Ajíbóyè 2006; Pereltsveig 2006). We show that, in some syntactic contexts, Lithuanian bare nouns are only able to receive definite interpretations; in one context, they are only interpreted indefinitely. We then tie these interpretations to the presence or absence of D. Further, we highlight problems with the view that there is a categorical difference between articleless (NP) and articleful (DP) languages (Bošković 2010; Despić 2011), by testing Bošković’s and Despić’s generalizations about NP vs. DP languages on Lithuanian. In both cases, Lithuanian ends up behaving somewhat like an NP language, and somewhat like a DP language. Lithuanian is therefore a counterexample to the NP/DP split posited by Bošković, and must receive a different analysis.
References (60)
Abney, Stephen. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD diss., MIT.
Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed.). 1997. Lithuanian grammar. Vilnius: baltos lankos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Carrie Gillon. In prep. The Conspiracy on D in Lithuanian.
Armoskaite, Solveiga. 2012. Effects of pluractional suffix. Evidence from Lithuanian. In Diane Massam (ed.), Mass-count across languages, 129–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Marina Sherkina-Lieber. 2008. Plur-actional and uni-actional suffixes. Evidence from Russian and Lithuanian. In Anton Antonenko, John Bailyn & Christina Bethin (eds.), FASL XVI Proceedings, 1–15. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ajíbóyè, Oládiípò. 2006. Topics on Yorùbá nominal expressions. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Antonia. 1998. Split DPs, focus, and scrambling in Modern Greek. In Emily Curtis, James Lyle & Gabriel Webster (eds.), The Proceedings of the sixteenth West Coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL 16), 1–16. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aljović, Nadira. 2002. Long adjectival inflection and specificity in Serbo-Croatian. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes. Syntaxe de la Definitude 311. 27–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1969. The law of contradiction. Philosophical Quarterly 191. 302–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Structuring sense, vol. I1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 331. 351–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. On the clausal and NP structure of Serbo-Croatian. In Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Toronto meeting, 2006, 42–75. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. In Proceedings of the Novi Sad generative syntax workshop 11. 53–73. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu.
. 2008b. What will you have, DP or NP? In Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds.), Proceedings of the North East linguistics society (NELS) 37, 101–114. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 631. 187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On NPs and clauses. Ms. University of Connecticut.
Bošković, Željko & Jon Gajewski. 2011. Semantic correlates of the NP/DP parameter. In Suzi Lima & Kevin Mullin (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 39. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2006. Theories of case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa & Rynt Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 509–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 61. 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & William A. Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 1998. The morphological and phonological constituent structure of words in Moses-Columvia Salish (Nxaʔamxcín). In Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins & M. Dale Kinkade (eds.), Salish languages and linguistics, 153–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. Bare nominals: Non-specific and contrastive readings under scrambling. In Simin Karimi (ed.), Word order and scrambling, 67–90. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Despić, Miloje. 2011. Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Melissa A. 1999. On the singular indefinite article in English. In Gianluca Storto (ed.), Syntax at Sunset 2, 14–58. Los Angeles: UCLA Working Papers in Syntax.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & Asya Pereltsvaig. 2004. Functional categories in the nominal domain. In Olga P. Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria-Luisa Rivero & Diana Stojanovic (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Ottawa meeting, 109–128. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, eventuality types, and nominal reference. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford: CSLI PublicatGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillon, Carrie. 2013. The semantics of determiners: Domain restriction in Skwxwú7mesh. Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harlig, Jeffrey. 1989. The interaction of verbal aspect and noun phrase determination in Hungarian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 161. 547–593.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise & Richard Demers. 1994. Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language 701. 697–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin F. 1995. Definiteness effect revisited. In Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian Volume 5, 65–88. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambova, Mariana. 2004. On information structure and clausal architecture: Evidence from Bulgarian. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 2002. Understanding semantics. London: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 609–665.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maleczki, Márta. 2001. Indefinite arguments in Hungarian. In Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Argument structure in Hungarian, 157–199. Budapest: AKK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric & Ioanna Sitaridou. 2002. Split wh-constructions in Classical and Modern Greek. In Artemis Alexiadou, Susann Fischer & Melita Stavrou (eds.), Papers from the Workshop ‘Language change from a generative perspective’ , 143–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 1998. Determiner systems and quantificational strategies: Evidence from Salish. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. When I was small – I Wan Kwikws: A grammatical analysis of St’át’imcets oral narratives. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ntelitheo, Dimitrios. 2004. Syntax of elliptical and discontinuous nominals. Los Angeles, CA: University of California MA thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 2006. A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives, and definiteness. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1970. On the article in English. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 233–248. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. On the universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica 61(1). 59–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(2). 433–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics 341. 165–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand & Alfred N. Whitehead. 1910–1913. Principia mathematica, 3 Vols1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2012. Word order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1989. Subjects, specifiers and X-bar theory. In Mark R. Baltin & Anthony S. Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 232–262. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swart de, Henrieta. 2012. Verbal Aspect. In Rober Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 752–781. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1984. From the definiteness effects to lexical integrity. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistic 241. 178–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. From the definiteness effects to lexical integrity. In Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Meij (eds.), Topic, focus and configurationality, 321–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 21. 167–189. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The noun phrase. In Stephen R. Anderson & Katalin F. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian, syntax and semantics, vol. 271. 179–275. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

SIGURÐSSON, EINAR FREYR & MILENA ŠEREIKAITĖ
2024. The dual face of structural object case: on Lithuanian genitive of negation. Journal of Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Köylü, Yılmaz
2021. An overview of the NP versus DP debate. Language and Linguistics Compass 15:3 DOI logo
Vaiksnoraite, Elena
2021. A direct analysis of Lithuanian phrasal comparatives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2021. Active Existential in Lithuanian: Remarks on Burzio’s Generalization. Linguistic Inquiry 52:4 ► pp. 747 ff. DOI logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2022. Impersonals, passives, and impersonal pronouns: Lessons from Lithuanian. Syntax 25:2 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Norris, Mark
2018. Nominal structure in a language without articles: The case of Estonian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Carrie Gillon
2015. Introduction The (not so) universal D. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60:3 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue