Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:1 (2015) ► pp.1–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The motivation for contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology

Published online: 21 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.1.01dre
The notion that phonological features are organized into contrastive hierarchies has been entertained at different times in the history of linguistics. My main focus will be on the motivation for such hierarchies: what principles govern the ordering of the features? I will show that they have been motivated by three different principles: a) Activity: to identify the contrastive features that are relevant to the phonological computation, b) Minimality: to minimize redundancy in phonological representations and to maximize the amount of information conveyed by each feature, and c) Universality: to express universal tendencies in the nature of phonological inventories and the order of acquisition of feature contrasts. These principles do not necessarily conflict in every case, but in practice situations arise where they lead in different directions. To some extent Jakobson and Halle (Jakobson & Halle 1956; Halle 1959) and Clements (2001; 2003; 2009) appeal to all these principles, though they do so with differing emphases: Jakobson began by appealing to Activity, Halle came to stress Minimality, and Clements focused on Universality. I will argue on behalf of the centrality of Activity, which I understand to be the original and most compelling motivation for feature hierarchies.
References (72)
Archangeli, Diana. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Revised version published 1988 by Garland Press, New York (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 51. 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avery, Peter & William J. Idsardi. 2001. Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 41–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botma, Bert. 2011. Sonorants. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Chapter 8. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. 22 December 2014 <[URL]>. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butska, Luba. 2002. Faithful stress in paradigms: Nominal inflection in Ukrainian and Russian. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cairns, Charles E. 1988. Phonotactics, markedness and lexical representation. Phonology 51. 209–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherry, E. Colin, Morris Halle & Roman Jakobson. 1953. Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language 291. 34–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English [SPE]. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christdas, Prath. 1988. The phonology and morphology of Tamil. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1987. Toward a substantive theory of feature specification. In James Blevins & Juli Carter (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 18, 79–93. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 71–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003a. Feature economy as a phonological universal. In María-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquín Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 3–9 August 2003, 371–374. Rundle Mall, Australia: Causal Productions (CD-ROM); Barcelona: Futurgraphic (print).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 201. 287–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The role of features in phonological inventories. In Eric Raimy & Charles Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 19–68. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 1998. On contrast and redundancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, May 1998, Ottawa. Ms., University of Toronto.
. 2003. Contrast and asymmetries in inventories. In Anna-Maria di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, volume 2: Morphology, phonology, acquisition, 239–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Chomsky and Halle’s revolution in phonology. In James McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Chomsky, 102–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Is harmony limited to contrastive features? In A. McKillen & J. Loughran (eds.), Proceedings from Phonology in the 21st Century: In Honour of Glyne Piggott. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 16. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Contrastive Features and Microvariation in Vowel Harmony. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), NELS 42: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Toronto, Volume One, 141–153. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall. 2009. Contrast in the twentieth century and beyond. Presented at the 17th Manchester Phonology Meeting , University of Manchester, May 2009.
Dresher, B. Elan, Glyne Piggott & Keren Rice. 1994. Contrast in phonology: Overview. In Carrie Dyck (ed.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of the Montréal-Ottawa-Toronto Phonology Workshop) 13(1). iii–xvii. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Keren Rice. 2007. Markedness and the contrastive hierarchy in phonology. [URL].
Dyck, Carrie. 1995. Constraining the phonology–phonetics interface, with exemplification from Spanish and Italian dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghini, Mirco. 2001. Place of articulation first. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 147–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groot, A.W. de. 1931. Phonologie und Phonetik als Funktionswissenschaften. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 41. 116–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie. 2007. The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology 281. 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan (ed.). 2001. Distinctive feature theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian: A linguistic and acoustical investigation [SPR]. The Hague: Mouton. Second printing, 1971.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herd, Jonathon. 2005. Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. In Chiara Frigeni, Manami Hirayama & Sara Mackenzie (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Special issue on similarity in phonology) 241. 65–116. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirayama, Manami. 2003. Contrast in Japanese vowels. In Daniel Currie Hall (ed.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Special Issue on Contrast in Phonology) 201. 115–132. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitets Arsskrift. Translated by A.R. Keiler as Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton, 1968.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1962 [1931]. Phonemic notes on Standard Slovak. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings I Phonological studies, 221–230. The Hague: Mouton.[Published in Czech in Slovenská miscellanea (Studies presented to Albert Pražak). Bratislava, 1931.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, C., Gunnar M. Fant & Morris Halle. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis MIT Acoustics Laboratory, Technical Report, No. 13. Reissued by MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., Eleventh Printing, 1976.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & John Lotz. 1949. Notes on the French phonemic pattern. Word 51. 151–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & Patricia A. Shaw. 1985. On the theory of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 21. 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 21. 305–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Kenneth N. Stevens. 2001. Enhancement revisited. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 271–291. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language 821. 33–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Yuni. 2013. On the status of allophones in the Contrastivist Hypothesis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB) . Themed session: The Representational Consequences of Marginal Contrasts, SOAS, August 2013. Revised version to appear in Lingua .
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part I), 131–176. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 21. 85–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2012. Tongue root harmony and vowel contrast in Northeast Asian languages. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir. 2012. Voicing and voice assimilation in Russian stops. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Sara. 2011. Contrast and the evaluation of similarity: Evidence from consonant harmony. Lingua 1211. 1401–1423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Aymara: Contrastive representations and constraint interaction. Phonology 301. 297–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1960. Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. Phonetics and linguistic evolution. In Bertil Malmberg (ed.), Manual of phonetics (revised and extended edition), 464–487. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reprinted from the first edition edited by Louise Kaiser, 1957, 252–273.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medushevsky, A. & R. Zyatkovska. 1963. Ukrainian grammar. Kiev: State Textbook Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohanan, K.P. 1986. Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford, Will. 2015. Patterns of contrast in phonological change: Evidence from Algonquian vowel systems. Language 911. 308–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 2003. Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 211. 39–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2011. Sonority. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Chapter 49. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. 22 December 2014 <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radišić, Milica. 2009. The double nature of the velar /g/ in Serbian. In Paul Arsenault, Lidia-Gabriela Jarmasz, Kyumin Kim & Milica Radišić (eds.), Toronto working papers in linguistics (Special issue on coronal phonology) 301. 91–103. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spahr, Christopher. 2014. A contrastive hierarchical account of positional neutralization. The Linguistic Review 311. 551–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, Richard. 1967. Redundancy rules in phonology. Language 431. 393–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1987. Redundant values. In Anna Bosch, Barbara Need & Eric Schiller (eds.), CLS 23: Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Part Two: Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 339–362. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1989. Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 651. 81–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Samuel Jay Keyser & Haruko Kawasaki. 1986. Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Joseph S. Perkell & Dennis H. Klatt (eds.), Symposium on invariance and variability of speech processes, 432–469. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S. 1969 [1939]. Principles of phonology. Translation by Christiane A.M. Baltaxe. Berkeley: University of California Press. [First published as Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001 [1936]. A theory of phonological oppositions. In Anatoly Liberman (ed.), Studies in general linguistics and language structure, 14–21. Translated by Marvin Taylor & Anatoly Liberman. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [First published as Essai d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 33 (1936): 5–18.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

DRESHER, B. ELAN & DANIEL CURRIE HALL
2021. The road not taken:The Sound Pattern of Russianand the history of contrast in phonology. Journal of Linguistics 57:2 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Beguš, Gašper
2020. Generative Adversarial Phonology: Modeling Unsupervised Phonetic and Phonological Learning With Neural Networks. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 DOI logo
Kostakis, Andrew
2019. Gothic &lt;r&gt; and Old High German &lt;r&gt;: Implications from phonological patterning. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Orzechowska, Paula
2019. Statistical Modelling of Phonotactic Constraints and Preferences. In Complexity in Polish Phonotactics [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Monahan, Philip J.
2018. Phonological Knowledge and Speech Comprehension. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan
2016. Contrast in Phonology, 1867–1967: History and Development. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan
2018. Contrastive Feature Hierarchies in Old English Diachronic Phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan
2024. Contrastive feature hierarchies and Germanic phonology. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 77:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Nevins, Andrew
2015. Triumphs and limits of the Contrastivity-Only Hypothesis. Linguistic Variation 15:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue