Cover not available

Article published In: Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 129160

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (70)
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2007. Greek phonetics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Lingusitics 81. 97–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, & Mary Baltazani. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In S.-A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 84–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Robert D. Ladd & Ineke Mennen. 2006a. Phonetic effects of focus and “tonal crowding” in intonation: Evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48(6). 667–696. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Tonal association and tonal alignment: Evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and Speech 491. 421–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary. 2007. Intonation of polar questions and the location of nuclear stress in Greek. In C. Gussenhoven & T. Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes. Volume II experimental studies in word and sentence prosody, vol. 21, 387–405. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary & Sun-Ah Jun. 1999. Focus and topic intonation in Greek. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 21. 1305–1308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht, Holland; Riverton, N. J.: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary & Jan Edwards. 1990. Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I. Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 152–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary & Janet Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 31. 255–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berkovits, Rochele. 1993. Progressive utterance-final lengthening in syllables with final fricatives. Language and Speech 361. 89–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Language and Speech 37(Pt 3). 237–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1993. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to- noise ratio of a sampled sound. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam [URL]
Bombien, Lasse. 2011. Segmental and prosodic aspects in the production of consonant clusters. Ph. D. Thesis, University of München. Retrieved from [URL]
Botinis, Antonis. 1989. Stress and prosodic structure in Greek: A phonological, acoustic, physiological and perceptual study. Lund: Lund University Press; Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Abigail Kaun, Shrinkanth Narayanan, & Elliot Saltzman. 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. In M.B. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V. Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Daylen Riggs. 2008. Locality interactions with prominence in determining the scope of phrasal lengthening. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38(2). 187–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Elliot Saltzman. 2003. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary- adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31(2). 149–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calhoun, Sasha. 2010. The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure: A probabilistic perspective. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 86(1). 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, Tina. 1997. The domain of final lengthening in the production of Dutch. In J. Coerts & H. De Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Nerthelands, 13–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, Tina & Alice Turk. 1999. A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch vs. English. Journal of Phonetics 27(3). 255–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong. 2005. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(6). 3867–3878. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, James McQueen & Ethan Cox. 2007. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 35(2). 210–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, William & Jeanne Paccia- Cooper. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth & Bushra Adnan Zawaydeh. 1999. Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics 27(1). 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitrova, Snezhina & Alice Turk. 2012. Patterns of accentual lengthening in English four-syllable words. Journal of Phonetics 40(3). 403–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Patricia Keating. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(6). 3728–3740. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Robert Ladd & Amalia Arvaniti. 2000. On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17(2). 143–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes & Evelina Leivada. 2012. Interface ingredients of dialect design Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In A.M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar. Essays on interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & A.C.M Rietveld. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structures and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 201. 283–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadjioannou, Xenia, Stavroula Tsiplakou & Matthias Kappler. 2011. Language policy and language planning in Cyprus. Current Issues in Language Planning 12(4). 503–569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofhuis, E., Carlos Gussenhoven & A.C Rietveld. 1995. Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch. Paper presented at the ICPhS 13, Stockholm.
Kainada, Evia. 2009. The phonetic and phonological nature of prosodic boundaries: evidence from modern Greek. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from [URL].
Katsika, Argyro. 2012. Coordination of prosodic gestures at boundaries in Greek. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 31. 129–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(5). 1208–1221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krivokapić, Jelena. 2007. The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, California.
Kuzla, Claudia, Taehong Cho & Mirjam Ernestus. 2007. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 351. 301–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, Michael. 2011. ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R package (Version 3.0.0). Retrieved from [URL].
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass., & London: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michelas, Amandine & Mariapaola D’Imperio. 2012. When syntax meets prosody: Tonal and duration variability in French Accentual Phrases. Journal of Phonetics 40(6). 816–829. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Sari Kunnari, Alice Turk, Kari Suomi & Riikka Ylitalo. 2009. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 37(1). 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Alice Turk, Kari Suomi, Sonia Granlund, Riikka Ylitalo, & Sari Kunnari. 2012. Quantity constraints on the temporal implementation of phrasal prosody in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 40(6). 796–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 2007. Prosodic phonology: With a new foreword. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, Brian. 1972. Cypriot Greek. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oller, Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America 541. 1235–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Ho-hsien. 2007. The effects of prosodic boundaries on nasality in Taiwan Min. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6). 3755–3769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon & Ilse Lehiste. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(6). 693–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Price, Patti, Marie Ostendorf, Stefanie Shattuck Hufnagel & Cynthia Fong. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(6). 2956–2970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, Charley & Kleanthes Grohmann. 2013. Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2241. 119–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 31. 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 550–569. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Alice Turk. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25(2). 193–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shue, Yen-Liang, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Markus Iseli, Sun-Ah Jun, Nanette Veilleux & Abeer Alwan. 2010. On the acoustic correlates of high and low nuclear pitch accents in American English. Speech Communication 52(2). 106–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Ph. D. Thesis, MIT.
. 2007. The syntax-phonology interface. In P. De Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou & Marianna Katsoyannou. 2006. Levelling, koineization and their implications for bidialectism. In F. Hinskens (ed.), Language variation. European perspectives, 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice, Satsuki Nakai, & Mariko Sugahara. 2006. Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: A practical guide. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertov, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter & J. Schließer (eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research, 1–26. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & James Sawusch. 1997. The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 25(1). 25–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2000. Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28(4). 397–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35(4). 445–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Laurence White. 1999. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 271. 171–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2010. Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1). 183–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Laurence. 2002. English speech timing: A domain and locus approach. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from [URL].
Wightman, Colin, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 911. 1707–1717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Babatsouli, Elena
2024. Ecosystemic Clinical Assessment of Linguistic Diversity: Greek-Dominant Speech. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 9:3  pp. 692 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos, Valantis Fyndanis & Kyrana Tsapkini
2022. Sonorant spectra and coarticulation distinguish speakers with different dialects. Speech Communication 142  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos, Kimberly Webster & Kyrana Tsapkini
2021. Effects of tDCS on Sound Duration in Patients with Apraxia of Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Brain Sciences 11:3  pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2016. Seeking an Anchorage. Stability and Variability in Tonal Alignment of Rising Prenuclear Pitch Accents in Cypriot Greek. Language and Speech 59:4  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2017. Dialect classification using vowel acoustic parameters. Speech Communication 92  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2017. The Nature of Phonetic Gradience across a Dialect Continuum: Evidence from Modern Greek Vowels. Phonetica 74:3  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2019. Dialect Classification From a Single Sonorant Sound Using Deep Neural Networks. Frontiers in Communication 4 DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2025. Linguistic and emotional prosody: A systematic review and ALE meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 175  pp. 106210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue