Article published In: Linguistic Variation
Vol. 12:2 (2012) ► pp.211–246
Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
Published online: 26 August 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
While it is clear that some languages have a grammatical mass/count distinction (e.g. English), in other languages (e.g. Inuktitut) it is not so obvious. In this paper, I show that Inuttut (Labrador Inuktitut) has a subtle grammatical mass/count distinction: while number, numerals, and most quantifiers do not disambiguate between mass and count nouns, in a few places, the morphology or the semantics disambiguates between mass and count. Thus, Inuttut is not a counterexample to Doetjes (1997) or Chierchia (2010), who both argue that all languages distinguish between mass and count. I further argue against Borer (2005) who claims all nouns in all languages are underlyingly neutral, and are assigned mass interpretation by default in the absence of individuation. I show that Inuttut nouns cannot all be underlyingly neutral and/or mass by default. Keywords: mass; count; classifiers; Inuktitut; number; numerals; quantifiers
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
de Vries, Hanna & George Tsoulas
Lima, Suzi & Susan Rothstein
2020. A typology of the mass/count distinction in Brazil and its relevance for mass/count theories. Linguistic Variation 20:2 ► pp. 174 ff.
Rothstein, Susan & Suzi Lima
Branigan, Phil & Douglas Wharram
Lima, Suzi
Lima, Suzi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
