Cover not available

Article published In: Variation in C: Comparative approaches to the Complementizer Phrase
Edited by Jacopo Garzonio and Silvia Rossi
[Linguistic Variation 18:2] 2018
► pp. 205–214

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Complementizers and variation in the CP

 | Università degli Studi di Padova
 | Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00009.gar
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The categorial status of COMPs
  • 3.The split-CP hypothesis
  • 4.On the features encoded in the CP
  • 5.On methodologies
  • References
References (34)
References
Arsenijević, Boban. (2009) ‘Clausal complementation as relativization’. Lingua 1191, 39–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. (2006) ‘A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance’, in R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, and P. Portner (eds) Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 53–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. (2004) ‘Topic, Focus and V2 – Defining the CP sublayers’, in L. Rizzi (ed.) The Structure of IP and CP: Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 52–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (2000) ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001) ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004) ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 104–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Typological Studies. Word Order and Relative Clause. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. (2010) ‘The Cartography of syntactic structures’, in B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam & Yannick Versley. (2016) (eds.) Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Perspectives from Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. (2007) ‘Types of Topics in German and Italian’, in S. Winkler and K. Schwabe (eds.) On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto (2018) ‘Exploiting microvariation: How to make your best with incomplete data’. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 112. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. (2010). About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. (2013) ‘The syntacticization of discourse’, in R. Folli, C. Sevdali & R. Truswell (eds.) Syntax and its Limits. NewYork/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia. (2007) ‘Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field’. The Linguistic Review 241. 61–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. (2012) ‘Linguistic Data types and the interface between language documentation and description’. Language Documentation and Conservation 61, 187–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. (1975). French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) ‘Some notes on comparative syntax with special reference to English and French’, in G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010) ‘Why isn’t This a complementizer?’, in: R. S. Kayne (ed.). Comparison and Contrasts. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. (2009) ‘Pro, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations’, in: K. Grohmann (ed.) Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, Interpretations. Amsterdam/Oxford: Elsevier, 131–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola. (2010) ‘Towards a hierarchy of clause types, in P. Benincà & N. Munaro (eds.) Mapping the Left Periphery, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 125–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. (2010) ‘Introduction: Complementizers and their Phase’, in P. Panagiotidis (ed.) The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001) ‘On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.) Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 267–296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004) ‘Locality and left periphery’, in A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 223–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014) ‘Some consequences of Criterial Freezing: Asymmetries, anti-adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences’, in P. Svenonius (ed.) Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci. (2017) ‘Left Periphery of the clause: primarily illustrated for Italian’, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. (2016). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Gabriela Soare. (2011) ‘Where’s ‘Why’?’. Linguistic Inquiry 421, 651–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny. (2003) ‘Configurational properties of point of view roles’, in A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. (1981). Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Koppen, Marjo. (2017) ‘Complementizer Agreement’, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue