Cover not available

Article In: Language Teaching for Young Learners: Online-First Articles

Principle-based phonics instruction for Grapheme–Phoneme correspondences and long-term spelling retention in Grade 5 EFL classrooms

ORCiD logo with link | Independent researcher
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This classroom-based mixed-methods study investigated a 16-week, principle-based phonics program that explicitly taught grapheme–phoneme correspondences (GPCs) to Grade 5 Taiwanese EFL learners. Twelve students completed a researcher-developed 50-word dictation at pretest (T1), posttest (T2), and a 15-week delayed test (T3), and provided anonymous written reflections. Nonparametric analyses (Wilcoxon signed-rank; McNemar) showed robust and durable gains: mean dictation accuracy increased from 56.00% at T1 to 78.00% at T2 and 88.83% at T3, and every learner maintained or exceeded posttest performance at delayed testing. Feature-level error tracking revealed significant improvement in six targeted areas, including letter-name vowel mappings for /ɛ/ and /æ/, Intervocalic /ɾ/ flapping contexts (t vs. d), nasals before stops, consonant clusters, and -tion/-sion → /ʃən/ spellings, with only minor relapse at T3. Reflections indicated greater rule awareness, more rule-guided self-correction, and fewer disruptions during drafting. Instructional implications include spaced micro-retrieval, spiral review, and rule-prompted revision; limitations include a single-group design, a small high-achieving sample, and reuse of the same test form. Lessons followed a consistent cycle of rule explanation, guided decoding, read-alouds, word-sorting, dictation, and short composition tasks that prompted learners to apply newly learned patterns in context. Students reported increased confidence when revising spelling during writing.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Developmental spelling theory and cognitive frameworks
    • 2.2Phonological awareness and cross-linguistic influences
    • 2.3Instructional principles for grapheme–phoneme mapping
    • 2.4Taiwanese learners’ specific spelling difficulties
    • 2.5Prior research and the present study’s approach
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instructional intervention
      • 3.2.1Contextualized read-alouds
      • 3.2.2Explicit phonics drills and integration with writing tasks
    • 3.3Materials and instruments
      • 3.3.1Spelling assessment (dictation test): Interpretation and use
      • 3.3.2Reflective consultations
    • 3.4Procedures
    • 3.5Data analysis
    • 3.6Error coding and reliability
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative analysis
      • 4.1.1Overall spelling gains and retention
      • 4.1.2Error type improvements
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1Thematic findings from group reflections
      • 4.2.2Case illustrations of learners’ spelling development
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Alignment with prior invented spelling research
    • 5.2Cross-linguistic phonology and minimal-contrast vulnerability in an EFL context
    • 5.3What an integrated design may contribute to retention
    • 5.4Pedagogical and theoretical implications
    • 5.5Limitations and directions for future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (39)
References
Almeida, T., Silva, A. C., & Rosa, J. (2021). Invented spelling intervention programmes: Comparing explicit and implicit instructions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apel, K. (2011). What is orthographic knowledge?.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassetti, B., Cerni, T., & Masterson, J. (2022). The efficacy of grapheme-phoneme correspondence instruction in reducing the effect of orthographic forms on second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 683–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2016). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction, 2nd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of learning disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 977–990. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 132(3), 354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuang, T. Y. (2013). Related Effectiveness of Phonological Awareness Training on Taiwanese EFL Children’s Word Spelling. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. Handbook of mixed methods research designs, 1(1), 21–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp. xviii–490). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, Y., & Shen, Y. (2023). Invented Spelling: Perspectives on Assessment and Intervention. In Routledge International Handbook of Visual-motor skills, Handwriting, and Spelling (pp. 207–220). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of reading, 9(2), 167–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific studies of reading, 18(1), 5–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Hay, I. (2012). Comparative effectiveness of phonological awareness and oral language intervention for children with low emergent literacy skills. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(3), 271–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentry, J. R. (2000). A retrospective on invented spelling and a look forward. The Reading Teacher, 541, 318–331.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (2016). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, T. H., & Wang, W. L. (2009). Invented spelling of EFL young beginning writers and its relation with phonological awareness and grapheme–phoneme principles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 44–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huo, S., & Wang, S. (2017, May). The effectiveness of phonological-based instruction in English as a foreign language students at primary school level: A research synthesis. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 21, p. 15). Frontiers Media SA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, S. H. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, J., & Starr, G. (2023). How L1-Mandarin L2-English learners perceive English front vowels: A phonological account. Glossa, 8(1), 1–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martins, M. A., Albuquerque, A., Salvador, L., & Silva, C. (2013). The impact of invented spelling on early spelling and reading. Journal of Writing research, 5(2), 215–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 322–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moats, L. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing, 221, 379–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (2005). Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts?. Annual review of applied linguistics, 251, 3–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child development, 79(4), 899–913. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford University Press. (1988). Start with English Readers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 144(7), 710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radant, H. L. H. J. (2009). Chinese phonotactic patterns and the pronunciation difficulties of Mandarin-Speaking EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly December 2009 Volume 11, Issue 4, 115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, C. (1988). Phonological awareness and adult readers. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, C., & Treiman, R. (2013). Children’s invented spelling: What we have learned in forty years. Rich languages from poor inputs, 197–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, C., Almeida, T., & Alves Martins, M. (2010). Letter names and sounds: their implications for the phonetisation process. Reading and Writing, 231, 147–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H. T. (2008). A developmental study on invented spelling and its relationship with phonological awareness in Taiwanese EFL children. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.
Swain, M., Kirkpatrick, T. A., & Cummins, J. (2011). How to have a guilt-free life using Cantonese in the English class: A handbook for the English language teacher in Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1992). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Sotak, L., & Bowman, M. (2001). The roles of letter names and letter sounds in connecting print and speech. Memory & Cognition, 291, 860–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue