Article published In: Research on EFL learning by young children in Spain
Edited by María del Pilar García Mayo
[Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2] 2021
► pp. 189–213
Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction
Published online: 27 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20007.pla
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20007.pla
Abstract
Previous research shows young learners are indeed able to interact in a foreign language (FL) and negotiate for meaning while also attending to form. One of the variables that has been least studied among young learners (YLs) in FL contexts is the kind of relationships established among the members of a dyad and how the nature of pair dynamics affects the learners’ ability to attend to language. The present study explores the pair dynamics and the frequency and types of language learning opportunities in the form of language-related episodes (LREs) that emerge during peer interaction in a spot-the-differences task completed by young learners in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. We also examine the effects of age and pair dynamics on the production of these LREs. Results suggest that children interact mainly using collaborative patterns and can actually attend to language in episodes which are mainly meaning-focused and are resolved particularly in expert/novice dyads. Age has been found to significantly affect the production of LREs but pair dynamics seems to be less determinant. Findings corroborate the need for YLs to be given the chance to interact with their peers in class to foster learning opportunities.
Keywords: child EFL, peer interaction, pair dynamics, LREs
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Pair dynamics and language learning
- 2.2Previous research on young learners’ pair dynamics and language learning
- 3.The study
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Instruments and procedures
- 3.3Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Pair dynamics
- 4.2LREs
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
References
References (57)
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). Patterns of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: the relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary acquisition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 98–114.
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 211, 480–495.
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 501, 844–870.
Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 941.
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113.
Butler, Y. G., & Zheng, W. (2015). Young foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages. A case of English learners in China. Education, 3–131, 441, 292–321.
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2020). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness.
Chen, W. (2017). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 711, 329–340.
Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 738–762.
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 581, 9–19.
Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.
(1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2018). Child task-based interaction in EFL Settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 119–143.
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Research Agenda and Pedagogical Implications (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics. An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 441, 451–466.
(2017). Child EFL interaction; age, instructional setting and development. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Researching the complexity of early language learning in instructed contexts (pp. 249–268). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 801, 165–175.
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 541, 40–54.
Garton, S., & Copland, F. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. London: Routledge.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ives, D. (2004). Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs: A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters, 1(4), 11–15.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234.
Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & Hidalgo, M. A. (2017). Benefits and limitations of conversational interactions among young learners of English in a CLIL context. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights (pp. 86–102). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 81, 55–81.
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 451, 605–655.
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.). Conversational interaction and second language acquisition (pp. 407–453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (third edition): Volume I: Transcription format and programs, Volume II: The database. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 657.
Moranski, K., & Toth, P. D. (2016). Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.) Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 291–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Murphy, V., & Evangelou, M. (2016). Early childhood education in English for speakers of other languages. London: British Council.
Navés, T., Miralpeix, I., & Celaya, M. L. (2005). Who transfers more…and what? Cross-linguistic influence in relation to school grade and language dominance in EFL. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2(2), 113–134.
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2019). Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners: What is the impact of proficiency and task type? Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1(1),82–102.
Oliver, R. & Bogachenko, T. (2019). Children and tasks. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 121, 48–65.
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627.
Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 245–266.
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. London: Routledge.
Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 111, 189–207.
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2017). Exploring early EFL: L1 use in oral narratives by CLIL and non-CLIL primary school learners. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 124–148). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (Special Issue), 10(3), 449–472.
Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 52–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rokita Raśkow, J., & Ellis, M. (2019). Early instructed second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode. Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 171, 95–114.
(2009). The nature of pair interaction: learners’ interaction in an ESL class: its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Task-based second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 821, 320–337.
(2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second-language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.
Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 27.1–27.24.
Vraciu, A., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2020). L1 use in peer interaction: Exploring time and proficiency pairing effects in primary school EFL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Couture-Matte, Robin
García Mayo, María del Pilar
2025. Task-based language learning among children in an EFL context. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 82 ff.
Nieva-Marroquín, María, María Martínez-Adrián & María Basterrechea
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet, Eloi Puig-Mayenco & Montserrat Capdevila
Azkarai, Agurtzane
2023. L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
