Cover not available

Article published In: Research on EFL learning by young children in Spain
Edited by María del Pilar García Mayo
[Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2] 2021
► pp. 189213

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (57)
References
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). Patterns of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: the relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary acquisition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 98–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 211, 480–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 501, 844–870. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young EFL learners and collabo­rative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 941. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collabo­rative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G., & Zheng, W. (2015). Young foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages. A case of English learners in China. Education, 3–131, 441, 292–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2020). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collabo­rative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, W. (2017). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 711, 329–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 738–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 581, 9–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Child task-based interaction in EFL Settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 119–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Research Agenda and Pedagogical Implications (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics. An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 441, 451–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Child EFL interaction; age, instructional setting and development. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Researching the complexity of early language learning in instructed contexts (pp. 249–268). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 801, 165–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 541, 40–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garton, S., & Copland, F. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ives, D. (2004). Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs: A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters, 1(4), 11–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collabo­rative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & Hidalgo, M. A. (2017). Benefits and limitations of conversational interactions among young learners of English in a CLIL context. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights (pp. 86–102). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collabo­rative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 81, 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 451, 605–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.). Conversational interaction and second language acquisition (pp. 407–453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (third edition): Volume I: Transcription format and programs, Volume II: The database. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 657. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moranski, K., & Toth, P. D. (2016). Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.) Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 291–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, V., & Evangelou, M. (2016). Early childhood education in English for speakers of other languages. London: British Council.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navés, T., Miralpeix, I., & Celaya, M. L. (2005). Who transfers more…and what? Cross-linguistic influence in relation to school grade and language dominance in EFL. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2(2), 113–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, R. & Bogachenko, T. (2019). Children and tasks. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 121, 48–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). Impact of task modality on collabo­rative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 245–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 111, 189–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2017). Exploring early EFL: L1 use in oral narratives by CLIL and non-CLIL primary school learners. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 124–148). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (Special Issue), 10(3), 449–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 52–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rokita Raśkow, J., & Ellis, M. (2019). Early instructed second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode. Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pairwork. Language Learning, 521, 119–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 171, 95–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The nature of pair interaction: learners’ interaction in an ESL class: its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Task-based second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 821, 320–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Focus on form through collabo­rative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second-language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 27.1–27.24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vraciu, A., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2020). L1 use in peer interaction: Exploring time and proficiency pairing effects in primary school EFL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogues between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Couture-Matte, Robin
2025. Virtual Reality in the Language Classroom: Strategies to Make it Work. The Canadian Modern Language Review 81:2  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
García Mayo, María del Pilar
2025. Task-based language learning among children in an EFL context. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17],  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Nieva-Marroquín, María, María Martínez-Adrián & María Basterrechea
2025. Do gender-pairings and age/proficiency interplay in LRE production? A preliminary study with young CLIL learners. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 20  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2025. Focused Task-Based Peer Interaction in the Young EFL Classroom: Enhancing Explicit Knowledge and Production of Present Continuous. In Investigating Attention to Form and Individual Differences:Research with EFL Children [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet, Eloi Puig-Mayenco & Montserrat Capdevila
2024. The effect of task-based peer interaction and pre-task instruction on young EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of past tense: An intervention study. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane
2023. L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Gallardo-del-Puerto, Francisco & María Martínez-Adrián
2022. Task Modality Effects on the Production and Elaboration of Language-Related Episodes: A Study on Schoolchildren’s Interactions in a Foreign Language. Languages 7:4  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue