Article published In: Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.131–143
Practitioner Research Article
Consciousness-raising and written error correction for young learners
A C-R action research project in a private language school
Published online: 2 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19010.ito
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19010.ito
Abstract
Most experts in teaching children state that teaching grammar in the traditional way is inappropriate for children
under the age of ten. However, very little research has been done on the effectiveness of consciousness-raising (C-R) with young
learners. An action research (AR) project was conducted in a private language school for children, to investigate if a
consciousness-raising project would be an effective way to help children notice and correct the ten most commonly made errors they
made in their writing of weekly book reports. It was concluded that this consciousness-raising project was effective and a
positive experience for children over the age of ten, but sometimes frustrating and less effective for younger learners. The
conclusions reached through this action research project led to changes in school policy on error correction, as well as greater
efforts to educate the parents of the students.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Situation
- 3.Literature review
- 4.First action research Cycle
- 5.Analysis of the first action research cycle
- 6.The second action research cycle
- 7.Post-action research questionnaire and student feedback
- 8.Conclusion
References
References (17)
Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. London: Routledge.
Amirian, S. M. R., & Sadeghi, F. (2012). The effect of grammar consciousness-raising tasks on EFL learners performance. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 708–720.
Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching-practice or consciousness-raising. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guidelines for Using ELLiE Smiley Questionnaires. 2010. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Harley, B. (2014). Charlie bumpers vs. The teacher of the year. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree Publishing Company.
Kersten, S. (2015). Language development in young learners: The role of formulaic language, 129–145. Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. M. (2006). How languages are learned [Kindle version]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Linse, C. T., & Nunan, D. (2006). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote ‘noticing’. ELT journal, 51(4), 326–335.
Wiens, K. (2012). I won’t hire people who use poor grammar. Here’s why. Harvard Business Review. <[URL]>
