Cover not available

Article published In: Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.82–102

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners

What is the impact of proficiency and task type?

 | Curtin University
 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
Published online: 22 March 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli
Abstract
Previous research carried out from a socio-cultural perspective has explored the way adult learners interact when undertaking tasks. Following the type of analysis initiated by Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 51, 119–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar we examined the patterns of interaction of young ESL learners (ages 9–12) of different English proficiency levels, high-intermediate (H) and low-intermediate (L) as they worked with native speakers (NS) (i.e., H/NS and L/NS pairs) to carry out a one-way and a two-way task. Once the patterns of interaction were determined, we then explored the relationship between these patterns, the learners’ proficiency levels and the task type. Our findings reveal that, regardless of proficiency, these child ESL learners engaged with the tasks and with each other, most often collaboratively, but also using other patterns interaction. However, the findings also suggest that task type and learner proficiency influenced the pattern of interactions that occurred.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Tasks and patterns of interaction
    • 1.2Proficiency and pairings
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Method
    • 2.4Data analysis
  • 3.Results and discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
References (33)
References
Adams, R. (2006). L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1521, 7–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). Patterns of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: the relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary acquisition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 98–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 844–870. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Oliver, R. (2016). Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. Language Learning Journal. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2014). Young foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 111, 45–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Young foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages: a case of English learners in China. Education 3–13, 431, 292–321.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, W. (2017). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 711, 329–340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: the transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. d. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: does task modality impact on language related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Research agenda and pedagogical implications (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 81, 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, M., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmqvist, A. (2005). How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output. Language Awareness, 14(2, 3), 128–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 384–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 171, 459–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 372–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in children aged five to seven years. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language interaction research in honour of Sue M. Gass (pp. 135–156). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2017). Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 371, 62–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode. Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 51, 119–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The nature of pair interaction: learners’ interaction in an ESL class: its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1): 31–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 821, 320–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 331, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 641, 605–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Bllaca, Nuhi & Izaskun Villarreal
2025. Exploring patterns of interaction, LREs and writing performance of adolescent EFL learners. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nieva-Marroquín, María, María Martínez-Adrián & María Basterrechea
2025. Do gender-pairings and age/proficiency interplay in LRE production? A preliminary study with young CLIL learners. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 20 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda
2025. A walk through time. In Child-centered Approaches to Applied Linguistic Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 13], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Jing
2025. Investigating the effects of task characteristics on interaction-driven learning opportunities between ethnic minority students and native Chinese-speaking students in Hong Kong. The Language Learning Journal 53:6 ► pp. 776 ff. DOI logo
Dao, Phung, Trang Le Diem Bui, Dao Thi Thuy Nguyen & Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen
2024. Synchronous online English language teaching for young learners: insights from public primary school teachers in an EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:8 ► pp. 2359 ff. DOI logo
Dao, Phung, Suong Thi Thu Hoang & Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen
2024. Young learners’ synchronous online peer interaction: teachers’ beliefs of its benefits and implementation. Language Awareness 33:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Trang Le Diem & Phung Dao
2023. Primary school children’s peer interaction: Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Kos, Tomas
2022. Exploring same- and different grade peer interactions among EFL young learners. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2021. Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Sayyadi, Ali & Reza Rezvani
2021. Questioning in TOEFL iBT speaking test: a case of washback and construct underrepresentation. Language Testing in Asia 11:1 DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane, María del Pilar García Mayo & Rhonda Oliver
2020. The effect of task repetition on the patterns of interaction of ESL children. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Marta Kopinska
2020. Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System 94 ► pp. 102338 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue