Cover not available

Translation published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:1 (2017) ► pp.90–122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Translation

The linguistic reconstruction of the past

The case of the Boro-Garo languages

Translated by
 | Independent researcher
Published online: 3 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.40.1.04van
Abstract
I will first describe (1) the linguistic situation in modern-day Assam (Northeast India) and the historical hypotheses that might explain it. These hypotheses are subjected to criticism. Next, I will analyse (2) in detail, the phonological concordances in the Tibeto-Burman languages and dialects of Central Assam that form the Boro-Garo group. I will present detailed criteria – the most detailed of all will concern the diphthongs – with examples, which will enable us to classify the languages. Using these criteria will also allow us to take advantage of certain ancient sources of information on dialects which are, in some cases, extinct. The study (3) of other Tibeto-Burman languages will consolidate our criteria and specify their historical development. Finally (4), I will propose a historical reconstruction of linguistic layers, after which (5) I will emphasise the importance of the distinction, central to our discussion, between language change and ethnic change (where cultural and physical anthropology follow distinct paths) before proposing a basis for a more general investigation of the Boro-Garo languages.
Northeastern India is home to a great number of languages, mainly from the Tibeto-Burman, Mon-Khmer, Tai and Indo-Aryan groups. This paper first summarises the current historical interpretations of this plethora, and concentrates on the Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in the lowlands, sc. the Boro-Garo subgroup. A phonological comparative assessment of the data provides a classification with definite criteria, and suggests historical interpretation. Central to this comparative study are the vowel systems, the analysis of which allows us to understand far better (and to use more appropriately) the older lexical lists from 1805. The result of this assessment is a new direction of research, when it appears that the Zeliangrong languages (traditionally taken as Southern Naga) offer a remarkable and certainly unexpected linguistic link between the Boro-Garo and the Kuki Chin (and Naga) languages. The paper exemplifies how language histories remain distinct from ethnic and political developments, and makes a useful contribution to a finer historical understanding of complex human situations.
Article outline
  • Introduction by F. Jacquesson
  • 1.The stratigraphic metaphor and the linguistic population of Assam
  • 2.The Boro-Garo languages
  • 3.External relations of Boro-Garo
  • 4.The history of the Boro-Garo languages
  • 5.The linguist and the logic of the groups
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (25)
References
Avouac, Jean-Philippe & P. De Wever (eds.). 2002. Himalaya-Tibet, le choc des continents. Paris: CNRS et Museum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan. A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. Shankara. 1968. Boro Vocabulary (With a Grammatical Sketch) [Building Centenary and Silver Jubilee Series 59]. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breugel, Seino van. 2014. ‘A grammar of Atong’. Leiden, Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burling, R. 1959. Proto-Bodo. Language 351: 433–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1961. A Garo Grammar. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins (with U.V. Joseph). 2006. ‘Comparative phonology of the Boro-Garo languages’. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, John. 1873. A rough comparative vocabulary of some of the dialects spoken in the “Nágá Hills” district’. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal (Calcutta) 42(1): App., I–XXIX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debbarma, Binoy. 2001. Concise Kokborok-English-Bengali Dictionary. Khumulwng: Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham-Bower, Ursula. 1946. Cycle-migration of the Zemi-Nagas, North Cachar Hills, Assam. Man in India XXVI1: 50–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1951. Naga Path. London: John Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grierson, Sir George (ed.). 1903–1928. Linguistic survey of India, Vol. 3: Tibeto-Burman Family. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gurdon, P. R. T. 1904. The Morans. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 731: 36–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacquesson, François. 1999. Abrégé d’histoire de l’Assam jusqu’à l’installation anglaise. Journal Asiatique 287(1): 191–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Deux territoires d’histoire linguistique, le Brahmapoutre & l’Iéniseï. BSLP 95(1): 343–388.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005a. Le Deuri: langue Tibéto-Birmane d’Assam [Collection de la Société de Linguistique de Paris]. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Les langues boro-garo. Essai de linguistique historique et comparative. Mémoire d’habilitation, Paris-3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. ‘La reconstruction linguistique du passé: Le cas des language Boro-Garo’. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jose, U. V. 2000. Rabha-English Dictionary Khúrangnala. Guwahati: Don Bosco Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorrain, J. H. 1950. Dictionary of the Lushai Language. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacFarlane, Alan & Iris MacFarlane. 2003. Green Gold: The Empire of Tea. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marak, H. W. 1975. Ku’bidik: A Garo-English-Assamese Dictionary. Guwahati: Assam Academy for Cultural Relations.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mochari, Moniram. 1985. Bodo-English Dictionary. Kokrajhar: Bodo Catholic Youth Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rongmei Lexicon. 1999. Imphal: Rongmei Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sarma, Pratham B., Manash Pratim Baruah & Bhaskar Bhattacharya
2024. COVID-19 and Ethnic Disparities: An Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 on Different Ethnic Groups of Assam State in Indian Sub-Continent. Assam Journal of Internal Medicine 14:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Evans, Jonathan P.
2022. Classifiers in Dimasa and (in-)definite marking. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue