Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 39:1 (2016) ► pp.49–66
Reflexive derivations in Thulung
Published online: 8 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah
Thulung Rai, an endangered Tibeto-Burman language spoken in Eastern Nepal, presents two derivational suffixes associated with reflexivization: -si and -s. The first, -si, is quite productive, found in complete paradigms, and derives reflexives, reciprocals, antipassives and anticausatives from transitive verbs (and occasionally from intransitive verbs). The second marker, -s, is more difficult to analyze: it has a limited distribution in verb paradigms, only appearing with 1pi and 3sg forms, and appears in a number of different contexts: it is found with the same types of derivations as -si but also — in some cases obligatorily, in others optionally — with verbs that do not have reflexive (or related) functions. It is even found with some transitive verbs. In this presentation, I will propose an analysis of the phenomena above based on elicited and narrative data I have collected in the field. The -s in fact has multiple, albeit related, origins: it is a phonological reduction of -si in certain circumstances, while in others it appears to be an older reflexivizing suffix which has been integrated, to different degrees, into verb morphology. With transitives, it appears to be a trace reflecting the complex derivational history of verbs which are derived from intransitives.
Keywords: reflexive, Kiranti languages, Thulung Rai
References (13)
Allen, Nicholas J. 1975. Sketch of Thulung Grammar, with Three Texts and a Glossary. Ithaca NY: China-Japan Program.
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. The Thulung Rai verbal system: An account of verb stem alternation. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 40(2): 189–224.
LaPolla, Randy. 1995. On the utility of the concepts of markedness and prototypes in understanding the development of morphological systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 66(4): 1149–1185.
. 2003. Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages [Routledge Language Family Series 3], Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 22–42. London: Routledge.
LaPolla, Randy J. with Yang Jiangling, 2004. Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong-Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics 21: 1–13.
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1975. Notes on the Kiranti verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 2(2): 183–218.
. 1999. Tibeto-burman dental suffixes: Evidence from Limbu (Nepal). In Topics in Nepalese linguistics, Yogenra P. Yadav & Warren W. Glover (eds.), 478–494. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy
. Limbu dictionary. <[URL]> (1 June 2015).
Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A Grammar of Wambule. Grammar, Lexicon, Texts and Cultural Survey of a Kiranti Tribe of Eastern Nepal [Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2]. Leiden: Brill.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Van Luven, Katie & Ida Toivonen
Inglese, Guglielmo
Inglese, Guglielmo
Inglese, Guglielmo
Post, Mark W. & Yankee Modi
Jacques, Guillaume
2021. Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their
sources. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 427 ff.
Lahaussois, Aimée
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
