Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.166–186

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Language reclamation strategies

Some Tibeto-Burman examples

 | La Trobe University
Published online: 11 February 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.2.01bra
Language endangerment confronts many Tibeto-Burman (TB) languages. This paper provides a general typology of methods for reclaiming such languages, using TB examples where possible, and discusses the problems which may arise. This is followed by a case study of one such endangered language, Gong in Thailand, and attempts for its reclamation.
References (43)
Bai Bibo & Bradley, David (eds). 2012. Muyu de Xiaoshi yu Cunliu/Extinction and Retention of Mother Tongues in China. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 1979. Lahu Dialects. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Interim report to the National Research Council of Thailand on majority/minority linguistic interfaces in Thailand. Bangkhen: National Research Council.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Identity: the persistence of minority groups. In John McKinnon & Wanat Bhruksasri (eds.), Highlanders of Thailand, 46–55. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Traditional minorities and language education in Thailand. In David Bradley (ed.), Language Policy, Language Planning and Sociolinguistics in South-East Asia, 87–102. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics A-67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Bisu dialects. In Paul K. Eguchi et al. (eds.), Languages and history in East Asia. Festschrift to Honour Prof. Tatsuo Nishida on his 60th Birthday, 29–59. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989a. Bisuyu de lishi genggai [Historical outline of the Bisu language]. Minzu Yuwen[Minority Languages of China] 1989(4): 35–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989b. The disappearance of the Ugong in Thailand. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, 33–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Chinese as a pluricentric language. In Michael G. Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric Languages, 305–324. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Tone alternations in Ugong. In Carol Compton & John Hartmann (eds.), Papers in Tai Languages, Linguistics and Literatures in Honor of William J. Gedney on his 77th Birthday, 55–64. De Kalb, IL: Northern Illinois University. Reprinted 2012a in Cathryn Donohue, Shunichi Ishihara & William Steed (eds.), Quantitative Approaches to Problems in Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Phil Rose, 55-62. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Onomastic, orthographic, dialectal and dialectical borders: the Lisu and the Lahu. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 38(2): 107–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language Policy for the Yi. In Stevan Harrell (ed.), Perspectives on the Yi of Southwest China, 195–214. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.), 2005a. Language Endangerment in the Sinosphere. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1731.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.), 2005b. Heritage Maintenance for Endangered Languages in Yunnan, China. Bundoora: Linguistics, La Trobe University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010a. Language endangerment and resilience linguistics: Case studies of Gong and Lisu. Anthropological Linguistics 52(2), 123–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Resilience in language endangerment. Romanian Review of Linguistics LV/21: 143–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010c. 危機言語のとらえ方に関する覚え書き [Resilience thinking and language endangerment]. In Kyoishi Hara (ed.), 言語的多様性とい視座 [International symposium on language futures], 58–83. Tokyo: Sangensha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. Resilience linguistics, orthography and the Gong. Language and Education 25(4): 349–360. Reprinted 2012b in Lida Cope (ed.), Applied Linguists Needed: Cross-disciplinary Networking in Endangered Language Contexts, 101-113. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Success and failure in Yi orthography reform. In Joshua A. Fishman & Ofelia García (eds.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity vol. 21: 180–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2012. Resilience thinking and language endangerment. In Bai Bibo & David Bradley (eds.), Muyu de Xiaoshi yu Cunliu/Extinction and Retention of Mother Tongues in China, 1–43 [in Chinese and English]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Sociolinguistics of language endangerment: Issues and solutions in Yunnan. Keynote paper presented at the 47th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Kunming, October 17-19, 2014.
Bradley, David & Bradley, Maya. 1999. Standardisation of transnational minority languages: Lisu and Lahu. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 69(1): 75–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.), 2002. Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Language Endangerment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 2007. The lingua franca cycle: implications for language shift. Anthropological Linguistics 49(3-4): 207–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2014. Creolization in the divergence of the Tibeto-Burman languages. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, 41–70. Berlin: de Gruyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) 2001. Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift, Revisited: A 21st Century Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Do Not Leave Your Language Alone: The Hidden Status Agenda within Corpus Planning in Language Policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul B. 2012. Dying young: Pidgins, creoles and other contact languages as endangered languages. In Genese M. Sodikoff (ed.), The Anthropology of Extinction: Essays on Culture and Species Death, 143–162. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha, Peltomaa, Marja, Sandman, Erika & Xiawu Dongzhou. 2008. Wutun. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerr, A.F.G. 1927. Two Lawa vocabularies. Journal of the Siam Society 21(1): 53–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1969. Research Possibilities on Group Bilingualism. Quebec: International Center for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayuree Puapunsuddee (Thawornpat). 1993. Verb in Gong. MA dissertation, Mahidol University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayuree Thawornpat. 2006. Gong, An Endangered Language of Thailand. PhD dissertation, Mahidol University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Person, Kirk R. 2005. Language revitalization or dying gasp? Language preservation efforts among the Bisu of Northern Thailand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1731: 117–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pusit Rujjanavet. 1986. The Phonology of Ugong in Uthai Thani Province. MA dissertation, Mahidol University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stary, Giovanni. 2003. Sibe: An endangered language. In Mark Janse & Sijmen Tol (eds.), Language Death and Language Maintenance: Theoretical, Practical and Descriptive Approaches, 81–88. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun Hongkai, Chirkova, Katia & Liu Guangkun. 2007. Baimayu Yanjiu [Baima Language Research]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas. 2002. Extinction in whose terms? Which parts of a language constitute a target for language maintenance programmes? In David Bradley & Maya Bradley (eds.), Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance, 310–328. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2002. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, Steven A. 1996. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger of Disappearing. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu Shixuan. 2005. Survey of the current situation of Laomian and Laopin in China. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1731: 99–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao Xiangru & Aximu (2011). Yinuyu Yanjiu [Äynu language research]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Yang, Cathryn, James N. Stanford, Yang Liu, Jinjing Jiang & Liufang Tang
2019. Variation in the tonal space of Yangliu Lalo, an endangered language of Yunnan, China. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Barbora, Madhumita & Trisha Wangno
2015. The Bugun language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue