Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 48:1 (2025) ► pp.132–161
The Cogtse plural marker =ɲê and its evolutionary pathway
Published online: 17 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.24002.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.24002.li
Abstract
This paper examines the plural marker =ɲê in
Cogtse Situ, a Gyalrongic language spoken in Western Sichuan, based on data from
Lin, You-Jing (林幼菁). 2016. 嘉戎语卓克基话语法标注文本 [Cogtse Rgyalrong Texts: Fully analyzed spontaneous narratives
with an updated sketch grammar of the
language]. Beijing: Social Sciences Press.. Although the
etymology of =ɲê suggests that it was originally a plural
marker, its morphosyntax reveals that its hosts range beyond traditional
nominals and further cover infinitives, clauses, and adverbs, indicating that
=ɲê has a wider array of uses beyond simply expressing
plurality in modern Cogtse. In this paper, I discuss the uses and the semantics
of the marker =ɲê extend to honorific, associative,
approximative, and intensificative. After describing the different functions of
=ɲê, I propose an evolutionary pathway for these uses. The
proposal of the pathway provides a possible explanation for the relationship
between different uses of this =ɲê, and this paper fills the
research gap in the study of the plural marker in Gyalrongic languages.
Keywords: Gyalrong, Cogtse, plural marker, grammaticalisation, semantic change
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Etymology of =ɲê ‘PL’
- 2.Number category
- 2.1Number applied to nouns
- 2.2Number applied to pronoun
- 2.2.1Personal pronoun
- 2.2.2Demonstrative pronoun
- 3.Cogtse =ɲê
- 3.1Uses and morphosyntax of =ɲê
- 3.2Additive plural use of =ɲê
- 3.3Honorific use of =ɲê
- 3.4Associative use of =ɲê
- 3.5Approximative use of =ɲê
- 3.6Intensificative use of =ɲê ‘PL’
- 3.7=ɲê ‘pl’ occurring after adverbs
- 4.The evolutionary pathways of =ɲê ‘PL’
- 4.1Additive plural as the original use
- 4.2From additive plural to honorific
- 4.3From additive plural to associative
- 4.4From associative to approximative
- 4.5From approximative and honorific to intensificative
- From approximative to intensificative
- From honoric to intensificative
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (60)
Bisang, Walter. 2013. 1
Numeral classifiers with plural marking. A challenge to
Greenberg. In Dan Xu (ed.), Plurality
and classifiers across languages in
China, 23–42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some universals in language usage studies in interactional
sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number
(Cambridge textbooks in
linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniel, Michael & Edith Moravcsik. 2013. The
associative plural
(v2020.4). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The
world atlas of language structures
online, Zenodo.
Denison, David. 2011. The
construction of SKT. Second Vigo-Newcastle-Santiago-Leuven International
Workshop on the Structure of the Noun Phrase in English (NP2), 15–16 September 2011, Newcastle
upon Tyne.
Gates, Jesse. 2021. A
grammar of Mazur
Stau. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales PhD dissertation.
Gong, Xun. 2014. The
personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu
Variety). Transactions of the Philological
Society 112(1).44–60.
. 2018. Le
rGyalrong Zbu, Une Langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest. Une étude
Descriptive, Typologique et
Comparative. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité PhD dissertation.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990. Studies
in numerical systems 1: Double numeral
systems. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On
language, 194–206. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Occurrence
of nominal plurality
(v2020.3). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The
world atlas of language structures
online. Zenodo.
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On
the role of context in
grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. The
emergence of the pluralis majestatis and the relative chronology of Old
Tibetan
texts. In Nepalica-tibetica:
Festgabe for Christoph
Cüppers, 249–262. Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo. 2010. Verbal
plurality and event plurality. Course Material, Summer School on Linguistic Typology Leipzig.
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A
grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored
description. Helsinki: Helsinki University PhD dissertation.
Hopper, Paul J. et al. 1991. On
some principles of
grammaticization. Approaches to
grammaticalization 11. 17–35.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie
et Morphologie du Japhug
(rGyalrong). Paris: Université Paris-Diderot-Paris VII PhD dissertation.
. 2016. Le
pentaglotte
Mandchou-Mongol-Tibétain-Gyalrong-Ouighour. Panchronica. , accessed 25 November
2024.
Jacques, Guillaume, Yunfan Lai, Anton Antonov & Lobsang Nima. 2017. Stau
(Ergong,
Horpa). In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan languages 2nd
ed., 597–613. London: Routledge.
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The
person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic,
Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the
Philological
Society 113(3).271–285.
. 2017. Grammaire
du Khroskyabs de
Wobzi. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité PhD dissertation.
. 2020. The
historical development of inverse marking in Khroskyabs: Evidence from two
modern varieties — Siyuewu and
Wobzi. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and
African
Studies 83(2).259–281.
. 2021. Come is the new go: The evolution of stem alternation of basic motion verbs in
Khroskyabs. Language and
Linguistics 22(2).338–375.
. 2022. Preinitial
denasalisation and palatal fortition in Khroskyabs and the Gyalrongic word
for ‘Man’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 45(2).211–229.
Lai, Yunfan, Xun Gong, Jesse P. Gates & Guillaume Jacques. 2020. Tangut
as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia
Linguistica 54(s41-s1).171–203.
Li, Fei (李菲). 2011. 文化记忆与身体表述——嘉绒锅庄 “右旋”
模式的人类学阐释 [Cultural Memory
and Body Expression: An Anthropological Interpretation of the Rightward Mode
in Gyalrong Guozhuang Dance]. Ethnic
Art (1). 86–93.
Lin, Xiangrong (林向荣). 1993. 嘉戎语研究 [Gyarung language
research]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Press.
Lin, Youjing. 2012. By
no means marginal: Privative tone in Zhuokeji
rGyalrong. Language and
Linguistics 13(4).625.
Lin, You-Jing (林幼菁). 2016. 嘉戎语卓克基话语法标注文本 [Cogtse Rgyalrong Texts: Fully analyzed spontaneous narratives
with an updated sketch grammar of the
language]. Beijing: Social Sciences Press.
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook
of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan
reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 2017. Cogtse Rgyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages 2nd ed., 572–596. London: Routledge.
Prins, Marielle. 2016. A
grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of
relations. Leiden: Brill.
Qi, Keely New Zuo. 2021. The
semantics of plurality in
Burmese. Singapore: National University of Singapore PhD dissertation.
Sedláček, Kamil. 1969. On
the use of plural markers in Modern
Tibetan. Central Asiatic
Journal 12(4).309–321.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives
and related constructions: A prototype
analysis. Language 61(4).821–848.
Sonam Lhundrop, Tunzhi, Hiroyuki Suzuki & Gerald Roche. 2019. Language
contact and the politics of recognition amongst Tibetans in the People’s
Republic of China: The rTa’u-speaking ‘Horpa’ of
Khams. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Storch, Anne & Gerrit J. Dimmendaal. 2014. Number
constructions and semantics: Case studies from Africa, Amazonia, India and
Oceania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sun, Jackson T-S. 2000a. Parallelisms
in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in
rGyalrongic. Language and
Linguistics 1(1).161–190.
2000b. Stem
alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic
subgroup in Qiangic. Language and
Linguistics 1(2).211–232.
2004. Verb-stem
variations in Showu rGyalrong. Studies on
Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on
his seventieth
birthday, 269–296. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sun, Jackson T-S. & B. Blogros. 2019. Tshobdun
Rgyalrong spoken texts with a grammatical
introduction. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sun, Jackson T-S (孙天心). 2006. 嘉戎语动词的派生形态語 [Derivational morphology in the Rgyalrong
verb]. 民族语文 Minzu
Yuwen 3–14.
Tang, Marc & One-Soon Her. 2019. Insights
on the Greenberg-Sanches-Slobin generalization: Quantitative typological
data on classifiers and plural markers. Folia
Linguistica 53(2). 297–331.
Vassilieva, Maria Borisovna. 2005. Associative
and pronominal plurality. New York: City University of New York at Stonybrook PhD dissertation.
Yang, Zhifan (杨之帆). 2021. The morphosyntax of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and modality categories in Bawang Horpa. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University PhD dissertation.
Zhang, Shuya. 2018a. Associated
motion in the Brag-dbar dialect of Situ
Rgyalrong. In Proceedings
of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and
Linguistics, 511, 69. Kyoto: Kyoto University.
. 2018b. Stem
alternations in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ
Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 41(2).294–330.
. 2020. Le
Rgyalrong Situ de Brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l’expression
des relations spatiales: L’orientation et le mouvement
associé: Paris: INALCO PhD dissertation.
