Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 44:1 (2021) ► pp.113–132
Realis converbs and irrealis converbs in Hwari Tibetan
Published online: 11 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.20006.son
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.20006.son
Abstract
This article analyzes the realis converbs and irrealis converbs in Hwari (Dpa’ ris) Tibetan, an
Amdo Tibetan dialect spoken in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Wuwei City, Gansu Province, China. One peculiarity of Hwari
Tibetan morphosyntax is the existence of a large set of converbal suffixes. A survey of previous descriptions reveals a lack of
consensus in the analysis of these converbs. They have been included in the framework of Written Tibetan too often, which has led
to confusion regarding their typological status. A primary objective of our paper is to rectify this approach by describing the
language on its own terms by comparing the morphosyntactic behavior of eight selected suffixes with regard to relevant criteria,
such as realis and irrealis. This empirical research feeds back into the theoretical discussion, as it shows that the Hwari
Tibetan converbs can be described using conventional typological concepts if construed appropriately. Our second objective is to
explain the semantic and pragmatic properties of these converbs, particularly -na and -ta. The
conclusion is that the two converb types are located along a continuum from realis/irrealis to positive/negative, thus
constituting an instantiation of syntax-semantics isomorphism. The clause chaining in Hwari Tibetan is representative. By
describing the converbs in Hwari Tibetan from the perspective of realis and irrealis, and by focusing on the syntactic properties
and pragmatic features of -Ce in realis converbs and -Ca in irrealis converbs, it is revealed that the irrealis converbs
-na and -ta function in a unique way in Hwari Tibetan.
Keywords: Hwari Tibetan, clause-chaining, irrealis, finite, switch reference, converb
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Converbs in Hwari Tibetan
- 3.Realis converbs and irrealis converbs
- 3.1The syntactic properties of realis Ce
- 3.1.1The preceding clause acts as an adverbial
- 3.1.2Expressing positive habitual events in real life
- 3.1.3Connecting actions or events
- 3.1.4Forming a double negative
- 3.2The syntactic properties of irrealis Ca
- 3.2.1The former action is the purpose of the latter
- 3.2.2Change of status
- 3.2.3-na is added after the preceding clause to connect the clauses and express assumption
- 3.2.4-na is added after the perfective verb form to emphasize ‘contrary to one’s wishes’ and ‘contra-expectation’
- 3.3Imperative
- 3.3.1Imperative verb+ Ca+ thoŋ for emphasis
- 3.3.2Imperative verb + ‑ta for polite imperatives
- 3.3.3Concession (the clauses could both be finite and form a compound sentence)
- 3.1The syntactic properties of realis Ce
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (28)
Bartee, Ellen Lynn. 2007. A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California dissertation.
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Review article: Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 2(3): 381–397.
DeLancey, Scott. 1991. The origins of verb serialization in modern Tibetan. Studies in Language 151: 1–23.
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dpa’ ris sangs rgyas. དཔའ་རིས་སངས་རྒྱས། 2003. Brda sprod gsal byed ngag SGron. བརྡ་སྤྲོད་གསལ་བྱེད་ངག་སྒྲོན། [The lamp of Tibetan grammar] Xining: Qinghai Nationalities Press.
Gesangjumian. 1987. Shiyong zangwen wenfa [Practical Tibetan grammar]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Press.
Haller, Felix. 2009. Switch-reference in Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(2): 45–70.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jendraschek, Gerd & Shin Yongmin. 2018. Korean converbs between coordination and subordination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Linguistics 56(5): 1099–1139.
Nedjalkov, Igor’ V. 1995. Converbs in Evenki. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 441–463. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sapir, Edward. 1930. Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Science 651: 1–3.
Shao, Mingyuan. 2018. Hexi zoulang binwei zangyu dongnahua yanjiu [Study on the endangered Dongna Tibetan in Hexi corridor]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The bulletin of the institute of history and philology Taipei 63(4): 945–1001.
Wang, Zhijing. 1994. Zangyu lasa kouyu yufa [A Grammar of Lhasa Tibetan]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
Ylikoski, Jussi. 2003. Defining non-finites: action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics 161: 185–237.
Zheng, Wuxi. 2019. Longxi qiangyu de renchen fanchou [The Person category in Longxi Qiang]. Language Science 181: 62–71.
