Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp.161–178

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Phonetic distance and dialect clustering on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau

 | Yunnan Normal University
 | University of Oslo
Published online: 5 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17004.pow
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to use string edit distance to describe the synchronic relationship between the Tibetan speech varieties located on the Northeastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. String edit distance provides a statistical way to compare a large number of linguistic features, in essence producing a statistical bundle of isoglosses. In this way, it can be used as a tool in dialect mapping and synchronic clustering. In this paper, the aggregate distance matrix produced by string edit distance reveals that the great degree of phonetic continuity on the grasslands of the northeastern edge of the plateau is matched by an equal degree of phonetic discontinuity in the mountains forming the eastern border of the plateau. While the dialects located on the grasslands can be grouped together into one cluster, the dialects in the mountains can be grouped together into six clusters.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous clustering in Aba and Gannan Prefectures
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Geographic location and historical background
  • 6.The results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (27)
References
Chamberlain, Brad. 2015. Linguistic watersheds: A model for understanding variation among the Tibetic languages. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 81: 71–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colen, Rinke, Charlotte Gooskens, Peter Kleiweg, Therese Leinonen & John Nerbonne. Gabmap. A web application for dialectology. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen.
Google Inc. 2012. Google Earth Pro (Version 7.1.7.2606) [CP]. <[URL]> (3 January 2017).
Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hua, Kan. 2002. Zangyu Anduo Fangyan Cihui (The vocabulary of Amdo Tibetan). Lanzhou: Gansu Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Di. 2002. Zangyu yuyinshi yanjiu (A study on Tibetan historical phonology). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin Peng (ed.). 1983. Zangyu jianzhi (Outline of Tibetan). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett. 1995. Computational dialectology in Irish Gaeilic. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 60–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of Asia, 19th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. <[URL]>
Lin, You-Jing. 2002. Phonological profile of Thewo Tibetan. Paper presented at the 8th Himalayan Languages Symposium, University of Berne, 18–22 September 2002.
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 1980. Amdo Sherpa Dialect: Material for Tibetan dialectology. Tokyo: Research Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John, Rinke Colen, Charlotte Gooskens, Peter Kleiweg & Therese Leinonen. 2011. Gabmap. A web application for dialectology. Dialectologia Special Issue II1: 65–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John & Peter Kleiweg. 2007. Toward a dialectological yardstick. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 14(2): 148–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renzeng, Wangmu (Rig-’dzin dBang-mo). 2013. Diebu Zangyu Yanjiu (Research on Diebu Tibetan). Beijing: Zhongyang Minzu Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. 2012. One size fits all? Dialectometry in a small clan-based indigenous society. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 247–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2003a. Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and Linguistics 4(4): 769–836.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003b. Qiuji zangyu de yuyin tezheng (Phonological characteristics of Chosrje Tibetan). Minzu Yuwen 61: 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki. 2008. Nouveau regard sur les dialectes tibétains à l’est d’Aba: Phonétique et classification du dialecte de Sharkhog [Songpan-Jiuzhaigou]. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(1): 85–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Tibetan dialects spoken in Shar khog and Khod po khog. EAST and WEST 59(1–4): 273–283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Issues in the lexical complexity in Eastern Tibetic languages: From a cat’s eye. Papers from the Second International Conference on Asian Geolinguistics, 116–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Gannan-syuu Zhuoni Diebu Zhouqu 3 ken no tibetto-kei syogengo to sono kaibunrui siron (Tibetic languages in three counties Cone, Thewo, and mBrugchu in Gannan Prefecture and an essay on their subclassification). Nidaba 441: 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2014. The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105–129. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Cathryn. 2010. Lalo Regional Varieties: Hylogeny, Dialectometry, and Socio-linguistics. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Cathryn & Andy Castro. 2008. Representing tone in Levenshtein distance. International Journal of Humanities and Computing 2(1–2): 205–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Jichuan. 1996. A sketch of Tibetan dialectology in China: Classifications of Tibetan dialects. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 25(1): 115–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhoumaocao (’Brug-mo-mtsho). 2003. Maqu Zangyu Yanjiu (Research on Maqu Tibetan). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhouta (’Brug-thar). 1996. Gansu Zangzu Buluo de Shehui yu Lishi Yanjiu (Historical and sociological research on Gansu’s Tibetan tribes). Lanzhou: Gansu Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Yuxia Zou (gYu ’brug mtsho)
2024. Writing oral varieties with the Tibetan script. A case study on Cone Tibetan. Études mongoles et sibériennes, centrasiatiques et tibétaines 55 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue