Article published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 47:2 (2024) ► pp.284–317
Argument indexation on verbs in Pangkhua and South Central Tibeto-Burman (Kuki‑Chin)
Published online: 8 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00022.akt
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00022.akt
Abstract
Both Pangkhua and South Central languages exhibit an elaborate indexation of arguments on verbs. Pangkhua shares
many of the characteristics of argument indexation with other languages in South Central while showing a relatively more
innovative pattern in this domain (verbal argument indexation). In South Central, major tendencies of argument indexation include
the loss of archaic patterns in mostly Central languages as opposed to Northwestern and Peripheral languages, the retention of
archaic forms in mostly negative constructions, and the relatively higher complexity in 1st person and 2nd person argument
indexation than in 3rd person. There is a notable affinity between a few Central and Peripheral languages in the
grammaticalization of directional markers as argument indexes. This affinity in specific functional domains indicates the
likelihood of language contact at a post proto-SC period.
Keywords: South Central, Kuki-Chin, Pangkhua, argument indexation, directionals, reconstruction, retention, innovation, Bangladesh
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Argument indexation on verbs in Pangkhua
- 2.1Pangkhua and South Central
- 2.2Morphosyntactic preliminaries
- 2.3Argument indexes
- 2.4Argument indexation on verbs
- 2.5Argument indexation in imperative constructions
- 2.6Some notable characteristics of argument indexation in Pangkhua
- 2.6.1Animacy hierarchy
- 2.6.2Marking of agentivity
- 2.6.3Argument marking deriving from directional marking
- 3.Argument indexation on verbs in South Central (Kuki-Chin)
- 3.1Subject argument indexes
- 3.1.11st person subject
- 3.1.22nd person subject
- 3.1.33rd person subject
- 3.2Object argument indexes
- 3.2.11st person object
- 3.2.22nd person object
- 3.2.33rd person object
- 3.1Subject argument indexes
- 4.Major findings
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (25)
Akter, Mohammed Zahid. 2020. A preliminary report on
Pangkhua: A Kuki-Chin language of Bangladesh. In Tariq Khan (ed.), The
interplays of language, society and
culture, 48–66. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages & Linguistic Society of India.
. 2022. A comprehensive description
of Pangkhua: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language of
Bangladesh. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD dissertation.
Bauman, James J. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal
morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley PhD dissertation.
DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards
a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan
Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.
. 2013. The
history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics
Society, 61. 1–17.
. 2014. Second
person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 37(1). 3–33.
. 2023. Argument
indexation (verb agreement) in South Central (Kuki-Chin). Himalayan
Linguistics 22(1). 243–275.
Devi, Thounaojam S. 2015. A descriptive grammar of
Anal. Silchar: Assam University PhD dissertation.
van Driem, George. 1993. The
Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African
Studies 56(2). 292–334.
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2023. Glottolog
4.6. 〈[URL]〉.
Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1965. Tiddim Chin: A descriptive analysis
of two texts. London: Oxford University Press.
Konnerth, Linda A. 2015. A new type of convergence at the
deictic center: Second person and cislocative in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in
Language 39(1). 24–45.
2019. Person indexation in Monsang
from a diachronic perspective. Himalayan
Linguistics 18(1), 54–77.
2021. Towards a diachronic typology of
individual person markers. Folia Linguistica
Historica 42(1). 1–24.
Konnerth, Linda A. & Scott DeLancey. 2019. Introduction
to ‘Verb agreement in languages of the Eastern Himalayan region’. Himalayan
Linguistics 18(1). 1–7.
Mroueh, Jade. 2019. A
preliminary documentation of variation in Tedim verbal person marking. Himalayan
Linguistics 18(1). 119–133.
Peterson, David A. 2002. On Khumi verbal pronominal
morphology. Berkeley Linguistics
Society 28S1. 99–110.
2003. Agreement and grammatical
relations in Hyow. In David Bradley et al. (eds.), Language
Variation: Papers on variation and change in the in the Sinosphere in honour of James A.
Matisoff, 173–183. (Pacific Linguistics
555). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Peterson, David. A. 2017. On Kuki-Chin
subgrouping. In Picus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical
linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honour of David
Bradley, 189–209. Leiden: Brill.
Saranghthem, Bobita. 2010. Sizang
(Siyin) grammar. Imphal: Manipur University PhD dissertation.
Singh, Nameirakpam G. 2003. A descriptive grammar of
Purum. Imphal: Manipur University PhD dissertation.
