Review published In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp.285–303
Book review
Review of Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill. (eds). 2016. Evidential systems of Tibetan languages
Reviewed by
Published online: 5 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00002.wid
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00002.wid
Article outline
- 1.Tibetan evidentiality systems and their relevance for the typology of evidentiality
- 2.General introduction
- 3.Papers on typology and history
- 4.Lhasa and Diasporic Tibetan
- 5.Papers on other Tibetan languages
- 6.Remarks on the terms “conjunct/disjunct” and “egophoricity”
- 7.Summary
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (28)
Bartee, Ellen. 2011. The role of animacy in the verbal morphology of Dongwang Tibetan. In Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds), Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, 133–182. Leiden: Brill.
Caplow, Nancy J. 2016. Inference and deferred evidence in Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, 225–257. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.
DeLancey, Scott. 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 65–72.
. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 289–321.
. 2003. Lhasa Tibetan. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 270–288. London: Routledge.
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan [London Oriental and African Language Library 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles dissertation.
Gonzales, Geny & Martine Bruil. 2016. On the existence of egophoricity in Nam Trik. Paper presented at the Symposium on Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement: Descriptive and Typological Perspectives, Stockholm, 17–18 March.
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics A 53], 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
Hargreaves, David J. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 51: 1–48.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687.
Hein, Veronika. 2001. The role of the speaker in the verbal system of the Tibetan dialect of Tabo/Spiti. LTBA 24(1): 35–48.
Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53(3): 479–524.
Post, Mark W. 2013. Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds), Functional-historical Approaches to Explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rule, William. M. 1977. A Comparative Study of the Foe, Huli and Pole Languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.
San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 161: 111–167.
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua, 120–143.
Tournadre, Nicholas & Sange Dorje. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and Civilization. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
. 1996. L’ergativité en Tibétain. Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée [Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 33]. Leuven: Peeters.
. 2008. Arguments against the concept of “egophoric” / “allophoric” in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds), Chomolongma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Insitute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian Studies.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
