In:Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 41–64
Get fulltext
The theory of affordances
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 14 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.03bli
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.03bli
In the last decade, the term “affordance,” coined by the ecological psychologist James Gibson (1986), has become a buzzword in CALL research. Often used to denote possibilities offered by technologies, the concept has been imported into CALL from cognate domains, such as human-computer Interaction (HCI). However, the CALL community has yet to engage in in-depth discussions on its meaning and usefulness for CALL research and design. The concept remains confusing, often misunderstood, and, at times, misused. This chapter provides an introduction to the concept of affordances, with a view to clarify its meaning and potential applications within CALL. Following a brief overview of Gibson’s theory of affordance, it presents and discusses leading HCI interpretations and conceptualizations of affordance that are particularly relevant to CALL researchers and designers. More specifically, it explicates HCI cognitivist and post-cognitivist views of affordances before exploring their relation to CALL affordances and their possible place within a CALL research agenda focusing more particularly on learner-computer interactions.
References (74)
Albrechtsen, H., Andersen, H.H., Bødker, S., & Pejtersen, A.M. (2001). Affordances in activity theory and cognitive systems engineering. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Baerentsen, K.B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. InProceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp.51–60). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Baumer, E.P.S., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Comparing activity theory with distributed cognition for video analysis: Beyond “Kicking the Tires.”Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.133–142). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Berglund, T. Ö. (2009). Multimodal student interaction online: An ecological perspective. ReCALL, 21(02), 186–205.
Blin, F., Nocchi, S., & Fowley, C. (2013). Mondes virtuels et apprentissage des langues: Vers un cadre théorique émergent. Recherches et Applications, 54, 94–107.
Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C.N. (2011). The human-artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction, 26(4), 315–371.
Bonderup Dohn, N. (2009). Affordances revisited: Articulating a Merleau-Pontian view. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 151–170.
Chapelle, C.A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753.
Cole, M. (2012). Preface. The ideal in human activity: A collection of the writings of Evald Vasilyevich Ilyenkov. Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, 12(2), 113–124.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. InJ.P. Lantolf & G. Appel(Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cowley, S.J. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 495–508.
. (2012). Cognitive dynamics: Language as values realizing activity. InA. Kravchenko(Ed.), Cognitive dynamics in linguistic interactions (pp. 1–32). Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M.J.W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.
Darhower, M.A. (2008). The role of linguistic affordances in telecollaborative chat. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 48–69.
De Haan, J., Reed, W.M., & Kuwada, K. (2010). The effect of interactivity with a music video game on second language vocabulary recall. Language Learning & Technology, 74(2), 74–94. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Descartes, R. (1647). La description du corps humain. InV. Cousin(Ed.), Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11). Paris, France: Levrault.
Dourish, P. (2001/2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied Interaction (Kindle edition). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being in the world: Commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and Time”, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
. (2014). Skillful coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. M.A. Wrathall(Ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987/2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719–740.
Gaver, W.W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.79–84). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gibson, J.J. (1970). Terms used in ecological optics. InJ. Pittenger, E.S. Reed, & M. Kim(Eds.), James Gibson’s purple perils: A selection of James J. Gibson’s unpublished essays on the psychology of perception. Retrieved from <[URL]>
. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception (Kindle edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoven, D., & Palalas, A. (2011). (Re)conceptualizing design approaches for mobile language learning. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 699–720.
Hsu, C.-K. (2015). Learning motivation and adaptive video caption filtering for EFL learners using handheld devices. ReCALL, 27(01), 84–103.
. (2012). The ideal in human activity. Marxists Internet Archive Publications. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Distribution of cognition between minds and artifacts: Augmentation of mediation? AI & SOCIETY, 10(1), 15–25.
. (2014). Affordances. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.) Retrieved from <[URL]>
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012a). Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and reflections. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
. (2012b). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.967–976). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Bødker, S., Carroll, J., Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Winograd, T. (2003). Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp.692–693). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Kirschner, P. (2002). Can we support CCSL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. InP.A. Kirschner(Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp.7–47). Heerlen, Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.-W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P.J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner: A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–22.
Lektorsky, V.A. (2009). Mediation as a means of collective activity. InA. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K.D. Gutiérrez(Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 75–87). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782.
Levy, M., & Steel, C. (2015). Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, FirstView, 1–20.
Linderoth, J. (2012). Why gamers don’t learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 4(1), 45–62.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept.
Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000
(pp.179–186). Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Newgarden, K., Zheng, D., & Liu, M. (2015). An eco-dialogical study of second language learners’ World of Warcraft (WoW) gameplay. Language Sciences, 48, 22–41.
. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition (Kindle ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Schulze, M., & Heift, T. (2013). Intelligent CALL. InM. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer(Eds.), Contemporary computer assisted language learning (Kindle edition, pp. 249–266). London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury.
Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. InL. Gasser & M. Huhns(Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 37–54). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2010). Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (Kindle). London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury.
Türk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2014). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 1–25.
Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2002). An affordance-based framework for CVE evaluation. InX. Faulkner, J. Finlay, & F. Detienne(Eds.), People and computers XVI – Memorable yet invisible (pp. 89–103). New York, NY: Springer.
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. InJ.P. Lantolf(Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
. (2008). Ecological-semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. InB. Spolsky & F.M. Hult(Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 596–604). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Vyas, D., Chisalita, C.M., & Dix, A. (2008). Dynamics of affordances and implications for design (Report). The University of Twente, Netherlands. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Vyas, D., Chisalita, C.M., & Van Der Veer, G.C. (2006). Affordance in interaction. Proceedings of the 13th Eurpoean conference on cognitive ergonomics: Trust and control in complex socio-technical systems (pp.92–99). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Ahmad Saffian, Khatriza & Noris Mohd Norowi
Gentil, Guillaume & Jérémie Séror
Schulze, Mathias, Catherine Caws, Marie-Josée Hamel & Trude Heift
Zhang, Lei & Tianyi Luo
Meihami, Hussein
McGuire, Erin, Anne M. Rietveld, Amanda Crump & Cees Leeuwis
Boultif, Amal & Béatrice Crettenand Pecorini
Holt, Benjamin
Börekci, Rabia & Selami Aydin
Cappellini, Marco
Cappellini, Marco
Colpaert, Jozef
Cohen, Cathy & Ciara R. Wigham
Marcão, Ricardo Pateiro, Gabriel Pestana & Maria José Sousa
Dey-Plissonneau, Aparajita
Dey-Plissonneau, Aparajita
Dey-Plissonneau, Aparajita & Françoise Blin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
