In:Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 1–13
Get fulltext
Cutting-edge theories and techniques for LCI in the context of CALL
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 14 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.01caw
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.01caw
As an introduction to the field of learner-computer interaction, this chapter argues for a need to generate knowledge about the online language learning process, developing a capacity for doing so by using cutting-edge frameworks and methods grounded in science and engineering. Adopting a posture of CALL engineers, we approach interaction-based research in CALL through the core concept of design and discuss LCI investigations in the context of technology-mediated task-based language learning. This chapter also presents the aim of the book; highlights the main features of contributors’ chapters; identifies the book’s readers and purposes for which it can be used. It summarizes each chapter in order to highlight the variations in theories and methods that this book promotes for the analysis of LCI. As such, this introductory chapter serves to guide readers to better apprehend the book content.
References (18)
Chapelle, C.A. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. InJ. Egbert & G. Petrie(Eds.), Research perspectives on CALL (pp. 53–64). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guichon, N. (2012). Vers l’intégration des TIC dans l’enseignement de langues. Paris, France: Didier.
Hémard, D. (2003). Language learning online: Designing towards user acceptability. In
U. Felix(Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 21–42). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hughes, J., & Parkes, S. (2003). Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 127–141.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and reflections. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Leontiev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. InJ.V. Wertsch(Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Mangenot, F. (2013). Les échanges en ligne comme secteur de pratiques et de recherches en ALAO: Quelles problématiques, quelles évolutions? OLBI Working Papers, 5(5), 3–21.
Maurel, M. (2009). The explicitation interview: Examples and applications. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10–12), 58–89.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Nissen, E. (2011). Variations autour de la tâche dans l’enseignement/Apprentissage des langues aujourd’hui. Alsic, 14.
Renkema, J. (2004). Introduction to discourse studies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.