Article published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 41:1 (2017) ► pp.66–86
Ethnolinguistic dilemma and static maintenance syndrome
A study of language policies and language perceptions in Pakistan
Published online: 20 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.41.1.04man
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.41.1.04man
Abstract
Only two out of over 70 indigenous mother tongues are recognized in schools in Pakistan. This study examines orientations of the governments’ language-in-education policies, and scrutinizes the influence the policies exert on vitality of indigenous mother tongues, and the perceptions of their speakers. Using undergraduate students as samples, the study employed mixed-method for data collection. Linguistic diversity and multilingualism have been looked upon as problem than asset in successive government policies. We find that although indigenous mother tongues enjoy strong roots and oral presence in informal private domains; however, they suffer from acute shrinkage in more literate domains such as schools and different media as majority of respondents passively assimilate towards Urdu and English languages. Language policies and current linguistic hierarchy appear to have exerted appreciable effect on respondents’ attitudinal and cultural orientations. Although, respondents demonstrate sentimental attachment towards their languages as cultural and identity signifiers; however, they overwhelmingly support English and Urdu as their desired languages-in-education leaving their own mother-tongues marginalized. Respondents’ approach is marked by ‘static maintenance syndrome, an attitudinal conundrum, in which they rationalize the ‘supposed inferiority of their languages’ vis-à-vis English (the official) and Urdu (the national) languages. Top-down and bottom-up orientations are characterized by neglect towards linguistic diversity.
لنډیز
په پاکستان کې په څه باندې ۷۰ ځايي مورنيو ژبو کې يوازې دوې ژبې په ښوونځيو کې ښودل کيږی. دا څيړنه د حکومت لخوا په تعليم کې د ژبو د تګلارې د فهم يا لور موندنې جاج اخلي. پر دې سربيره د هغه اغيز ازموينه کوي چې دغه تګلارې يې د ځايي مورنيو ژبو پر پايښت او د ويونکو پر ادراک کوي. په څيړنه کې له څوارلسم صنف څخه لاندې زده کوونکې د نمونې په توګه اخيستل شوي دي او په دې کې د معلوماتو راغونډولو لپاره ګډه طريقه کارول شوې ده. د حکومت په تګلارو کې په پرلپسې توګه د ژبو تنوع او ګڼو ژبو ويلو ته د يوې پانګې په سترګه نه بلکې د يوې ستونزې په سترګه کتل کيږی. موږ ته معلومه شوې چې که څه هم ځايي مورنۍ ژبې په غير رسمي شخصي څانګو کې ټينګې ريښې او شفاهي حضور لري خو دوی په ډېرو ادبي او علمي څانګو کې ځپل شوي دي. د بيلګی په توګه په ښوونځيو او بيلابيلو رسنيو کې زياتره کسان په پټو سترګو په اردو او انګليسي ژبو کې ځانونه جذبوي. داسې ښکاري چې د ژبو تګلاره او د ژبو اوسنۍ درجه بندۍ د خلکو د رويو او کلتور پر پوهې د قدر وړ اغيز کړی دی. که څه هم خلک د کلتور او شناخت د مسما په توګه د خپلو ژبو په اړه احساساتي تړاو څرګندوي خو د تعليمي ژبې په توګه په پرېکنده ډول د اردو او انګليسي ملاتړ کوي او خپلې مورنۍ ژبې يې بې ارزښته ګرځولي دي. د ځواب ورکوونکو خلکو مېل د پر ځای ولاړې پديدې له لارې ذکر شوی دی چې د رويې معما ده. په دې عمل کې دوی د انګليسي (چې سرکاري ژبه ده) او اردو (چې ملي ژبه ده) په پرتله د خپلو مورنيو ژبو هغه کمتري په دليل وړاندې کوي. له لوړې څخه لاندې او له لاندې څخه لوړ فهم د ژبو د تنوع په لور له پامه غورځول شوی دی.
Resumo
Etnolingvistika dilemo kaj la sindromo de senmova konservado: Studo de lingvaj politikoj kaj lingvaj perceptoj en Pakistano
Nur du el inter 70 indiĝenaj patrinaj lingvoj estas rekonataj en lernejoj en Pakistano. La nuna studo ekzamenas orientiĝojn de la registara politiko pri lingvo en edukado, kaj detale ekzamenas la influon de politikoj je la vivipovo de indiĝenaj patrinaj lingvoj kaj la perceptojn de iliaj parolantoj. Uzante bakalaŭrajn studentojn kiel samplojn, la studo utiligis miksmetodon por datenokolektado. Tuta sinsekvo de registaraj politikoj emas rigardi lingvodiversecon kaj multlingvismon kiel problemon, ne bonaĵon. Ni konstatas, ke, kvankam indiĝenaj patrinlingvoj ĝuas fortajn radikojn kaj perbuŝan viglon en neformalaj privataj domenoj, ili tamen travivas akutan ŝrumpiĝon en pli kulturitaj domenoj, ekzemple lernejoj kaj aliaj medioj, dum la plimulto de respondantoj pasive asimiliĝas al la urdua kaj angla lingvoj. Lingvaj politikoj kaj la nuna lingva hierarkio ŝajne havis rimarkeblan efikon je la orientiĝoj de respondantoj rilate iliajn opiniajn kaj identecajn orientiĝojn. Kvankam respondantoj montras sentimentalan ligon al siaj lingvoj kiel kulturaj kaj identecaj markiloj, ili preskaŭ komplete subtenas la anglan kaj urduan kiel siajn deziratajn edukajn lingvojn kaj lasas marĝene siajn patrinlingvojn. La starpunkton de la respondantoj karakterizas “senmova konservada sindromo,” vidpunkta enigmo, laŭ kiu ili raciigas la “supozatan malsuperecon de siaj lingvoj” kontraste al la angla (la oficiala) kaj urdua (nacia) lingvoj. Desupraj kaj desubaj orientiĝoj estas karakterizataj de neglekto al lingva diverseco.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Attitude formation, policy and planning
- Sociolinguistic situation and language policies in Pakistan
- Policy towards Urdu
- Policy towards English
- Policy towards indigenous languages
- Methodology
- Instrumentation
- Questionnaires
- Interviews
- Instrumentation
- Results
- Linguistic background of participants
- Language use within the family
- Use of media
- Importance of indigenous languages
- Respondents’ favorite language policy in schools
- Discussion
- The local attitudes – indigenous languages and domain shrinkage
- The official attitudes – language-as-a-resource versus language-as-a-problem
- Static maintenance syndrome and ethnolinguistic dilemma
- Conclusion and the way forward
References
References (59)
Alexander, N. (2002). Linguistic rights, language planning and democracy in postapartheid South Africa. In S. Baker (Ed.), Language Policy: Lessons from Global Models. Monterey CA: Monterey Institute of International Studies.
(2007). Linguistic diversity in Africa in a global perspective. In N. Alexander & B. Busch (Eds.), Literacy and linguistic diversity in a global perspective: An intercultural exchange with African countries (pp. 13–22): European Centre for Modern Languages Council of Europe Publishing.
Ayres, A. (2003). The Politics of Language Policy in Pakistan. In M. E. Brown & Š. Ganguly (Eds.), Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia (pp. 51–80). Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
(2009). Speaking like a state: Language and nationalism in Pakistan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad Pakistan: The British Council.
Coleman, H., & Capstick, T. (2012). Language in education in Pakistan: Recommendations for policy and practice. Islamabad Pakistan: British Council
Durrani, M. (2012). Banishing colonial specters: Language ideology and education policy in Pakistan. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 27(1), 29–49.
Ethnologue. (2014). Languages of the World Retrieved July 20, 2014, from [URL]
Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michael Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
GOP. (2001). Census. Islamabad Pakistan: Retrieved from [URL].
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2006). Saving languages: an introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, K. D. (2007). When languages die: the extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jinnah, M. A. (2000). Jinnah: Speeches and statements 1947–1948. Karachi Pakistan: Oxford University Press.
Khurshid, N. K. (2009). Language education in Pakistan: A postcolonial analysis Masters of Education, Critical Studies, The University of New Brunswick New Brunswick.
Kontra, M., Phillipson, R., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Várady, T. (2000). Introduction: Conceptualising and Implementing Linguistic Human Rights. In M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & T. Várady (Eds.), Language, a Right and a Resource: Approaching Linguistic Human Rights (pp. 1–24). Budapest Central European University Press.
Kraus, M. E. (2007). Keynote – Mass Language Extinction and Documentation: The Race against Time. In O. Miyaoka, O. Sakiyama & M. E. Krauss (Eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific rim (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lasagabaster, D., & Huguet, Á. (2007). Introduction: A Transnational Study in European Bilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual matters
Lin, A. M. Y., & Martin, P. W. (2005). From a Critical Deconstruction Paradigm to a Critical Construction Paradigm: An Introduction to Decolonisation, Globalisation and Language-in-Education Policy and Practice. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, Globalisation Language-in-Education Policy and Practice (pp. 1–19). London: Multilingual Matters.
Maffi, L. (2001). On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Washington, [D.C.]; London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Mahboob, A. (2002). No English, no future: Language policy in Pakistan. In S. O. B. Hartford (Ed.), Political independence with linguistic servitude: The politics about languages in the developing world (pp. 1042). New York: NOVA Science
Manan, S. A., & David, M. K. (2013). Mapping ecology of literacies in educational setting: The case of local mother tongues vis-à-vis Urdu and English languages in Pakistan. Language and Education, 28(3), 203–222.
(2014). Language management: A snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan. Language Policy, 151, 3–26.
(2004a). The Medium of Instruction Dilemma: Implications for Language Planning in Higher Education. In S. Mansoor, S. Meraj & A. Tahir (Eds.), Language Policy, Planning, & Practice: A South Asian Perspective. Karachi: Agha Khan University.
(2004b). The Status and Role of Regional Languages in Higher Education in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(4), 333–353.
May, S. (2003). Rearticulating the Case for Minority Language Rights. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(2), 95–125.
(2006). Language policy and minority rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 255–272). Malden, Mass.; Oxford: Blackwell.
McCarty, T. L. (2009). Empowering Indigenous Languages: What can be Learned from Native American Experiences?. In R. P. T. Skutnabb-Kangas, A. K. Mohanty & M. Panda (Ed.), Linguistic Diversity and Language rights:Social Justice Through Multilingual Education (pp. 125–139). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mustafa, Z. (2011). Tyranny of language in education, the problems and its solutions Karachi: Ushba Publishing International.
Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1997). The medium of instruction controversy in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(2), 145–154.
(1999b). Language, Politics and Power in Pakistan: The Case of Sindh and Sindhi Ethnic Studies Report, 17.
(2001). English-Teaching Institutions in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(3), 242–261.
(2002). Language, ideology and power: Language learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Karachi; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005). Language Policy, Multilingualism and Language Vitality in Pakistan. In A. Saxena & L. Borin (Eds.), Lesser-Known Languages of South Asia – Status and Policies, Case Studies and Applications of Information Technology (pp. 73–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rassool, N., & Mansoor, S. (2007). Contemporary issues in language, education and development in Pakistan. In N. Rassool (Ed.), Global issues in language, education and development: perspectives from postcolonial countries (pp. 218–244). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Shackle, C. (2007). Language and national identity in Pakistan. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Language and National Identity in Asia (pp. 100–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235–249.
Siddiqui, S. (2010). Rethinking education in Pakistan: perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Karachi: Paramount Publishing Enterprise.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Phillipson, R. (2000). Rights to language: equity, power, and education: celebrating the 60th birthday of Tove Skutnabb-Kangas. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical Theory in Language Policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, Mass.; Oxford: Blackwell.
Tollefson, J. W., & Tsui, A. (2004). Medium of instruction policies: which agenda? whose agenda? Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum.
Torwali, Z. (2014, April 7). The beauty of diversity, The News International. Retrieved from [URL].
UNESCO. (2003). Language Vitality and Endangerment Paris France: UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section’s Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages.
. (2013). Language vitality and endangerment Retrieved February 26, 2013, from [URL].
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Ali, Rukhsana
Khan, Muhammad Yasir, Syed Abdul Manan & Liaquat Ali Channa
Manan, Syed Abdul & Anas Hajar
Zeeshan, Muhammad
Chaudhary, Nabiha
Joshi, Puskar R. & Zohreh R. Eslami
Bazai, Zia ur Rehman, Syed Abdul Manan & Stefanie Pillai
Gubitosi, Patricia & Paola Medina González
Manan, Syed Abdul, Sham Haidar & Rooh UI Amin
Ahmad, Naseer & Zhou Guijun
Aslam, Maqsood, Etienne Farvaque & Muhammad Azmat Hayat
Manan, Syed Abdul & Khadija Tul-Kubra
Manan, Syed Abdul, Liaquat Ali Channa, Khadija Tul‐Kubra & Maya Khemlani David
Tamim, Tayyaba & John Lee
Manan, Syed Abdul
Manan, Syed Abdul
Manan, Syed Abdul, Maya Khemlani David & Liaquat Ali Channa
MANAN, SYED ABDUL, MAYA KHEMLANI DAVID, FRANCISCO PERLAS DUMANIG & LIAQUAT ALI CHANNA
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
