Article published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:2 (2016) ► pp.163–186
Language vitality and language identity — which one is more important?
Tibetan-Chinese bilingual education in Maketang versus Huazangsi
Published online: 4 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.2.04yao
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.2.04yao
How to protect language diversity in the world is a hotly discussed topic in linguistic research. This study investigates the relationship between Tibetan language vitality and language users’ identity in Maketang and Huazangsi Tibetan Autonomy County. On the basis of empirical data, the study suggests that there are no strong, positive correlations between Tibetan language vitality and the speakers’ language identity (or with their language activities and inclinations). However, pragmatic matters constitute an important factor that influences speakers’ activities and inclinations. These findings can be explained by conflicting functions performed by language: language as a communication tool on the one hand, and language as a receptacle of culture on the other. Bilingual (or multilingual) education can fulfill a useful role in balancing these two language functions. As a result of the evidence in this study, we argue that language protection cannot preserve both language vitality and language identity, and that, therefore, language protection should pay more attention to issues of language identity rather than to issues of language vitality.
References (15)
Gorenflo, L.J., Romaine, S., Mittermeier, R.A., & Walker-Painemilla, K. (2012). Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109/21: 8032–8037.
Lewis, M.P. (Ed.). (2009) Ethnologue: Languages of the world (16th ed.). Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.
Lewis, M.P. & Simons, G.F. (2010) Simons. Assessing Endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 55/ 21: 103–120.
Phinney, J.S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist 51/9: 918–927.
The Sixth Plenary Session of the Seventeenth CPC Central Committee. (2011, October 26). The Decision of the CPC Central Committee on Major Issues Pertaining to Deepening Reform of the Cultural System and Promoting the Great Development and Flourishing of Socialist Culture, Renmin Daily (Renmin Ribao). 1–11.
UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages. (2003) Language Vitality and Endangerment. Paris: The International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages.
Wang Yuanxin. (2010). Chinese ethnic languages and character, a kind of non-objection culture heritage. In Zhao Xueyi & Guan Kai (Eds.), Chinese Ethnic Non-objection Culture Heritage, Beijing: Minzu Press. 134 - 192.
Yao Chunlin. (2012). Energetic or Endangered: Case Study on Tibetan Language Use and Attitude in the First Villager Group of Juhua Village, a Tibetan-Chinese Bilingual Community. Chinese Sociolinguistics, 18/21, 63–69.
. (2013a). Case Study on Language Use and Attitude in Maketang Town under Urbanization. Language Research 141: 181–189.
. (2013b). How Urbanization Affects the Language Life in Amdo Dialect Region: Case Study on Tibetan Use and Attitude in Huazangsi Town. Journal of the Central University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 61: 153–159.
Zuckermann, G., & Walsh, M. (2011). Stop, Revive, Survive!: Lessons from the Hebrew Revival Applicable to the Reclamation, Maintenance and Empowerment of Aboriginal Languages and Cultures. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 111–127.
Zuckermann, G., Yao Chunlin, & Jia, Xu. (2012). Universal Constraints and Mechanisms in the Reclamation and Empowerment of Endangered Languages and Dialects. World Ethno-National Studies, 61, 66–73.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gan, Yongtao & Sude Sude
2021. Bilingual students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language. Language Problems and Language Planning 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.