Article published In: Linguistic Equality
Edited by Humphrey Tonkin
[Language Problems and Language Planning 39:3] 2015
► pp. 298–311
Language in the United Nations post-2015 development agenda
Challenges to language policy and planning
Published online: 25 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.39.3.06fet
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.39.3.06fet
The United Nations system has been engaged for some years in setting new development priorities to replace the Millennium Development Goals following their expiry in 2015. While language issues are almost wholly absent from documents intended to guide this policy process, there are thought-provoking implications for language planners in some of the key ideas advanced by agencies within the UN system. These include the need to address structural inequalities, greater emphasis on cities as loci of social planning and management, growing interest in social protection floors as a policy mechanism, and the implications of sustainable development as an alternative planning paradigm.
References (27)
Agenda 21 (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June, 1992.
Chand, A. (2005). Do you speak English? Language barriers in child protection social work with minority ethnic families. British Journal of Social Work, 35(6),807–821.
Corrêa d’Almeida, A., & Otcu-Grillman, B. (2013). The Portuguese language in the United Nations: Framing policy design. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2241, 1–23.
Deumert, A., Inder, B., & Maitra, P. (2005). Language, informal networks and social protection:Evidence from a sample of migrants in Cape Town, South Africa. Global Social Policy, 51,303–328.
Fettes, M. (1997). Language planning and education. In R. Wodak and D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, volume 1: Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 13–22). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Fishman, J.A., Ferguson, C.A., & Dasgupta, J. (1968). Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley.
Lin, A., & Martin, P.W. (Eds.). (2005). Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
May, S. (2014). Justifying educational language rights. Review of Research in Education, 381, 215–241.
McEntee-Atalianis, L.J. (2006). Geostrategies of interlingualism: Language policy and practice in the International Maritime Organisation, London, UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 341–358.
Monaka, K.C., & Mutula, S.M. (2010). An inclusive linguistic framework for Botswana: Reconciling the state and perceived marginalized communities. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 51, 51–65.
Orr, D.W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (2nd revised edition). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Pomeroy, E.C., & Nonaka, A. (2013). Language and social work: Are we really communicating effectively? Social Work, 58(2), 101–104.
Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Think Piece 9. Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) (2012). Towards freedom from fear and want: Human rights in the post-2015 agenda. Thematic Think Piece 9. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
Think Piece 10. Economic Commission for Europe (ECE), Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), UN Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) and UN Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women (UN Women) (2012). Addressing inequalities: The heart of the post-2015 agenda and the future we want for all. Thematic Think Piece 10. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
Think Piece 16. Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), International Labour Organization (ILO), UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) and UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2012). Social protection: A development priority in the post-2015 UN development agenda. Thematic Think Piece 16. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
Think Piece 17. Economic Commission for Europe (ECE), Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2012). Building on the MDGs to bring sustainable development to the post-2015 development agenda. Thematic Think Piece 17. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
Think Piece 18. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN Habitat) (2012). Sustainable urbanization. Thematic Think Piece 18. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
Thomas, C.A., & Lee, B. (2010). Language liaisons: Language planning leadership in health care. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(2), 95–119.
Tollefson, J.W., & Tsui, A.B.M. (2014). Language diversity and language policy in educational access and equity. Review of Research in Education, 381, 189–214.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2014). Prototype global sustainable development report. New York and Geneva: UNDESA.
Weiss, L., Gany, F., Rosenfeld, P., Carrasquillo, O., Sharif, I., Behar, E., Ambizas, E., Patel, P., Schwartz, L., & Mangione, R. (2007). Access to multilingual medication instructions at New York City pharmacies. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(6), 742–754.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Fettes, Mark
Hult, Francis M.
Hélot, Christine
Tesseur, Wine
Alcalde, Javier
Alcalde, Javier & Martín Portos
McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa J.
McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa J.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
