Zamenhof and the liberal-communitarian debate

Schor, Esther

doi:10.1075/lplp.39.3.04sch

Article published In: Linguistic Equality
Edited by Humphrey Tonkin
[Language Problems and Language Planning 39:3] 2015
► pp. 269–281

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Zamenhof and the liberal-communitarian debate

Esther Schor | Princeton University

Published online: 25 February 2016

https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.39.3.04sch

This paper proposes to analyze the early thinking of Ludwig Lazarus Zamenhof (1859–1917) in light of the so-called liberal/communitarian debate. In the early 1980s, the debate was launched: On the liberal side were proponents of a liberal self bearing rights, irrespective of identity (John Rawls) and on the communitarian side, champions of communities with prerogatives and purposes (Michael Sandel). But this debate has become in recent years a dialogue, each side challenging the other to assimilate its claims, be they ontological, political, or ethical. This paper argues that, a century earlier, Zamenhof was involved in a similar dialogue between liberalism and communitarianism, inventing a movement that could potentially balance human rights with notions of the good espoused by different communities. The political potential of Esperanto, however, was undermined (though not collapsed) by the Declaration of Boulogne, which eschewed deliberative debate and abjected religious and ethical ideals.

Keywords: John Rawls, Charles Taylor., Zamenhof, liberal-communitarian, Esperanto

References (27)

Boulton, M. (1960). Zamenhof: Creator of Esperanto. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Burke, E. (1986 [1790]). Reflections on the revolution in France. London: Penguin.

De Schutter, H. (2007). Language policy and political philosophy: On the emerging linguistic justice debate. Language Problems and Language Planning, 3(1), 1–23.

Etzioni, A. (1995). Rights and the common good: The communitarian perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

. (1996). The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 1–11. <[URL]>

Gutmann, A. (2003). Communitarian critics of liberalism. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 182–194). New York: Routledge.

Korĵenkov, A. (2009). Homarano: La vivo, verkoj kaj ideoj de D-ro L. L. Zamenhof. Kaliningrad: Sezonoj; Kaunas: Litova Esperanto-Asocio.

Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (Eds.). (2003). Language rights and political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lins, U. (1990). La danĝera lingvo (2nd ed.). Moscow: Progreso.

Okrent, A. (2009). In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel and Grau.

Patten, A. (2001). Political theory and language policy. Political Theory, 29(5), 691–715.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

. (2003). The domain of the political and overlapping consensus. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (160–181). New York: Routledge.

Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

. (2003). Liberalism and the limits of justice. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 140–159). New York: Routledge.

Schor, E. (2010). L. L. Zamenhof and the shadow people. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(2), 183–192.

Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

. (2003). Cross-purposes: The liberal-communitarian debate. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 195–212). New York: Routledge.

Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society [Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft]. (trans. J. Harris and M. Hollis). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <[URL]>

Universal Congress of Esperanto. (1905). Declaration of Boulogne. (Trans. unidentified.) E@I. <[URL]>

Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walzer, M. (2004). Politics and passion: Toward a more egalitarian liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

World Conference on Linguistic Rights. (1996). Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights. UNESCO, Paris. < [URL]>

Zamenhof, L.L. (1889). Doctor Esperanto’s international language (trans. R.H. Geoghegan). <[URL]>

. (2006 [1896]). Letter to [Nikolai] Borovko, 1896. In A. Korĵenkov (Ed.), Mi estas homo (pp. 33–38).Kaliningrad: Sezonoj.

. (2006 [1901]). Hilelismo. In A. Korĵenkov (Ed.), Mi estas homo (pp. 39–96). Kaliningrad: Sezonoj.

Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Alcalde, Javier

2018. Linguistic Justice: An Interdisciplinary Overview of the Literature. In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice, ► pp. 65 ff.

Tonkin, Humphrey

2016. Invented cities, invented languages. Language Problems and Language Planning 40:1 ► pp. 85 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.