Review published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 32:3 (2008) ► pp.303–306
Book review
. Spelling and Society: The Culture and Politics of Orthography Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xix + 189 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 12 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.32.3.16nue
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.32.3.16nue
References (15)
Allerton, D. J. 1982. Orthography and dialect: How can regional pronunciations be accommodated in a single orthography? W. Haas. ed. Standard Languages Spoken and Written. Manchester: Manchester U.P. 57–69.
Baker, Philip. 1993. Developing ways of writing vernaculars: Problems and solutions in a historical perspective. Andrée Tabouret-Keller, Robert B. Le Page, Penelope Gardner-Chloros & Gabrielle Varro. ed. Vernacular Literacy: A Reevaluation. Oxford: Clarendon. 93–141.
Barton, David. 1994. Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bermel, Neil. 2007. Linguistic Authority, Language Ideology, and Metaphor. The Czech Orthography Wars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Downing, P., P. Lima, & M. Noonan. ed. 1992. The Linguistics of Literacy. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Garcez, P. M. 1995. The debatable 1990 Luso-Brazilian orthographic accord. LPLP 191:151–178.
Garvin, Paul. 1954. Literacy as problem in language and culture. Georgetown University Monograph Series in Language and Linguistics 71:117–129.
Geerts, G., J. Vand Den Broeck & A. Verdoodt. 1977. Success and failures in Dutch spelling reform. Joshua Fishman. ed. Advances in the Creation and Revision of Writing Systems. The Hague: Mouton. 179–245.
Hornberger, Nancy H. 1995. Five vowels or three? Linguistics and politics in Quechua language planning in Peru. James W. Tollefsen. ed. Power and Inequality in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P. 187–205.
