Cover not available

Article published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 48:1 (2024) ► pp.26–47

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Language-based capabilities to conceptualise linguistic justice

ORCiD logo with link | Centre For Research and Documentation on World Language Problems
Published online: 27 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.23049.gia
Abstract
This article proposes an application of the capability approach (CA) within linguistic justice, adopting a capability-based approach. The aim is to break down the concept into language-based capabilities associated with public goods, which can be evaluated through qualitative or quantitative methods, aligning with policy cycle models. The objective is to deconstruct the abstract notion of linguistic justice into manageable components, namely language-based capabilities, making it amenable to scrutiny through policy analysis. Language-based capabilities are capabilities linked to public goods and services that inherently require a language for conversion into functioning. The state plays a crucial role as a conversion enabler through fair and effective language policies. This breakdown into language-based capabilities facilitates the identification of individual strategies, making the evaluation of language policies easier. Such an approach enables an examination of the policymaking process, including its efficacy, shortcomings, and opportunities for improvement. The ultimate goal is to translate a highly normative approach into an operational definition, further breaking it down into measurable indicators, thereby advancing the field.
Resumen
Este artículo propone una aplicación de capability approach (CA) dentro de la justicia lingüística, adoptando un enfoque basado en capacidades. El objetivo es desglosar el concepto en capacidades basadas en el lenguaje asociadas con bienes públicos, que pueden evaluarse mediante métodos cualitativos o cuantitativos, alineándose con los modelos de ciclo de políticas. El propósito es desglosar la noción abstracta de justicia lingüística en componentes manejables, es decir, capacidades basadas en el lenguaje, haciéndola susceptible a un escrutinio mediante el análisis de políticas. Las capacidades basadas en el lenguaje son aquellas capacidades vinculadas a bienes y servicios públicos que inherentemente requieren un lenguaje para convertirse en funcionalidades. El Estado juega un papel crucial como facilitador de conversión a través de políticas lingüísticas justas y efectivas. Este desglose en capacidades basadas en el lenguaje facilita la identificación de estrategias individuales, haciendo que la evaluación de las políticas lingüísticas sea más accesible. Este enfoque permite examinar el proceso de formulación de políticas, incluyendo su eficacia, deficiencias y oportunidades de mejora. El objetivo final es traducir un enfoque altamente normativo en una definición operativa, desglosándolo aún más en indicadores medibles, avanzando así en el campo.
Resumo
La nuna artikolo proponas aplikadon de la kapableca aliro (CA) ene de lingva justeco, utiligante aliron bazitan je kapableco. La celita vojo estas disdividi la koncepton en lingve bazitajn kapablojn asociitajn kun publikaj varoj kaj takseblajn laŭ kvalitaj aŭ kvantaj metodoj, kongrue kun politikociklaj modeloj. La fina celo estas malkonstrui la abstraktan nocion de lingva justeco en trakteblajn komponentojn, nome lingve bazitajn kapablojn – tiel taŭgigante ĝin al ekzamenado pere de politika analizo. Lingve bazitaj kapabloj estas kapabloj ligitaj al lingvaj varoj kaj servoj kiuj en si mem bezonas lingvon por ke ili entute funkciu. La ŝtato ludas esencan rolon kiel transformilo per justaj kaj efikaj lingvaj politikoj. Tiu dismeto en lingve bazitajn kapablojn faciligas identigon de unuopaj strategioj, tiel apogante la taksadon de lingvaj politikoj. Tia aliro ebligas ekzamenadon de la politikofara procedo, inkluzive ĝiajn efikecon, mankojn, kaj okazojn por plibonigo. La finfina celo estas traduki tre normecan aliron en operacian difinon, plue dividante ĝin en mezureblajn indikilojn kaj tiel antaŭenigante la fakon.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework: Capabilities and language
    • 2.1A premise on method: Who are the linguistic minorities?
    • 2.2CA and language in the literature
    • 2.3Language-based capabilities and the role of the state in language policy
  • 3.Language-based capabilities and dimensions of linguistic wellbeing
    • 3.1Limitations of the study and excluded capabilities
  • 4.Conclusions and further developments
  • Note
  • References
References (103)
References
Adamson, L. (2021). ‘Language of instruction: a question of disconnected capabilities’, Comparative Education, 57(2), pp. 187–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcalde, J. (2018). ‘Linguistic justice: An interdisciplinary overview of the literature’, in Language Policy and Linguistic Justice: Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches. Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alkire, S. (2005). ‘Why the Capability Approach?’, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 115–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alkire, S., Comim, F. and Qizilbash, M. (2008). The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, P., Hunter, G. and Smith, R. (2005) ‘Capabilities and well-being: evidence based on the Sen–Nussbaum approach to welfare’, Social Indicators Research, 171, pp. 9–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, P., Krishnakumar, J. and Tran, N. B. (2011). ‘Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity’, Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4), pp. 205–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, S. and Sen, A. (1994). ‘Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement.’Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banai, A. (2013). ‘Language Recognition and the Fair Terms of Inclusion: Minority Languages in the European Union’, in Liberal Multiculturalism and the Fair Terms of Integration. Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 194–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barakos, E. (2020). ‘Linguistic and social justice: Towards a debate of intersections and disjuncture’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(2), pp. 265–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2015). ‘The political value of languages’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, A. M., Chen, C. N. and Alegría, M. (2010). ‘English language proficiency and mental health service use among Latino and Asian Americans with mental disorders’, Medical care, 48(12), p. 1097. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernhardt, D. (2021). ‘Woman gets creative through TikTok, using new ways to share an old language | CBC News’, CBC [Preprint]. Manitoba. Available at: [URL]
Biggeri, M. and Libanora, R. (2011). ‘From Valuing to Evaluating: Tools and Procedures to Operationalize the Capability Approach’, Children and the Capability Approach, pp. 79–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bizot, O. (2021). ‘Creators on TikTok elevating Māori culture and language – The Observers’, France14-The Observer [Preprint]. Available at: [URL]
Bonotti, M., Carlsson, N. and Rowe, C. W. (2022). ‘Introduction: Linguistic justice, migration and the nation-state’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 379–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonotti, M. and Lazzari, C. De. (2023). ‘Linguistic justice for non-resident citizens: Protecting language interests away from home’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brando, N. and Morales-Gálvez, S. (2021). ‘Capabilities and Linguistic Justice’, Political Studies, pp. 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briggs, C. L. (2017). ‘Towards Communicative Justice in Health’, Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 36(4), pp. 287–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. (2011). ‘’Operationalizing’the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty-first-century Britain’, Journal of Human Development, 12(1), pp. 91–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carey, B. (2019a). ‘The preference satisfaction model of linguistic advantage’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(2), pp. 134–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carey, B. and Shorten, A. (2018). ‘How should we identify and measure linguistic disadvantage?’, in he MIME Vademecum Mobility and Inclusion in Multilingual Europe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Civico, M. et al. (2022). Emergency language policy: Principles and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comim, F. (2001). ‘Operationalizing Sen’s Capability Approach’, in Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach Conference.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crnić-Grotić, V. (2018). ‘The Right to Display Place Names in Regional or Minority Languages within the Council of Europe Legal Framework’, Language Policy and Conflict Prevention, pp. 182–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duggan, N. and Holmström, I. (2022). ‘“They have no language”: Exploring language ideologies in adult education for deaf migrants’, Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 16(2), pp. 147–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2020). ‘Language Economics and Language Rights’, Bridging Linguistics and Economics, pp. 224–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxebarria, A. et al. (2022). ‘An Educational Project Based on the YouTuber Phenomenon for the Development of a Minority Language’, Sustainability, 14(10). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M. et al. (2023). ‘Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning: Introduction’, Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning, pp. 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M. (2023). ‘Language policy as public policy’, in Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning. Springer, pp. 41–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M. and Grin, F. (2018). ‘Comparative language policy and evaluation’, in Translation and Public Policy. Routledge, pp. 83–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M., Grin, F. and Vaillancourt, F. (2020). ‘Evaluating Language Policy and Planning’, Bridging Linguistics and Economics, pp. 109–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M. and Iannàccaro, G. (2023). ‘INDICATORS IN LANGUAGE POLICY AND PLANNING’, in M. Gazzola et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Taylor and Francis, pp. 331–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M., & Marinaro, N. (2022). Sprachenpolitik und Integration in Ausländerbehörden und Krankenhäusern: Der Fall Berlin und Leipzig. Jahrbuch der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik, 2022.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M., Templin, T. and Wickström, B.-A. (2018). Language policy and linguistic justice: Economic, philosophical and sociolinguistic approaches. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, M., Wickström, B.-A. and Fettes, M. (2023a). ‘Towards an Index of Linguistic Justice’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics [Preprint], (Aop). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grin, F. (2003). Language Planning and Economics, Current Issues in Language Planning. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grin, F. and Fürst, G. (2022). ‘Measuring Linguistic Diversity: A Multi-level Metric’, Social Indicators Research, 1641, pp. 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustafsson, K. et al. (2022). ‘The right to an interpreter – A guarantee of legal certainty and equal access to public services in Sweden?’, Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories, 1(1–2), pp. 165–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, B. C. and Mcallister, I. (2007). ‘Integrated Education, Intergroup Relations, and Political Identities in Northern Ireland’, Social Problems, 541, pp. 1533–8533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herraez Ortega, J. M., Abril Martí, M. I. and Martin, A. (2009). ‘Community interpreting in Spain: A comparative study of interpreters’ self perception of role in different settings’, in S. Beatriz Hale, U. Ozolins, and L. Stern (eds) The Critical Link 5: Quality in interpreting a shared responsibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 149–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Giest, S. (2015). ‘Policy Cycle’, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, pp. 288–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iannàccaro, G. (2019). ‘Verso un’individuazione del “disagio linguistico”’, in Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iannàccaro, G. and Dell’Aquila, V. (2016). ‘On Linguistic Abilities, Multilingualism, and Linguistic Justice’, Acta Un. Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 91, pp. 49–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iskra, K. A. (2022). ‘Fact Sheets on the European Union: Language policy’, European Parliament [Preprint]. Available at: [URL]
Jacobsen, B. (2004). ‘Pragmatic Meaning in Court Interpreting: An Empirical Study of Additions in Consecutively-Interpreted Question-Answer Dialogues’, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(1), pp. 165–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanaki, A. (2021). ‘Multilingualism and Social Inclusion in Scotland: Language Options and Ligatures of the “1+2 Language Approach”’, Social Inclusion, 9(1), pp. 14–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1977). ‘Ten types of language planning’, in Language Planning and the Building of a National Language, Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. and Patten, A. (2003). Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford Uni. Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeBlanc, M. (2010). ‘Le français, langue minoritaire, en milieu de travail : des représentations linguistiques à l’insécurité linguistique’, Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 6(1), pp. 17–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, H. (2017). ‘Realising linguistic justice: resources versus capabilities’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(7), pp. 595–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent : language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, L. (2022). ‘Theorising English as a Linguistic Capability: A Look at the Experiences of Economically Disadvantaged Higher Education Students in Colombia’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 23(3), pp. 477–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales-Gálvez, S. (2017). ‘Living together as equals: Linguistic justice and sharing the public sphere in multilingual settings’, Ethnicities, 17(5), pp. 646–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). ‘Is speaking one’s own language(s) a right?’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 387–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales-Gálvez, S. and Cetrà, D. (2021). ‘The controversy over the linguistic model of the catalan education system: Arguments, their normative bases and prospects for rapprochement’, Revista de Llengua i Dret, (75), pp. 46–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales-Gálvez, S. and Riera-Gil, E. (2019). ‘Què Són Polítiques Lingüístiques Justes ? Els Paradigmes Actuals de la Justícia Lingüística’, Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals – Journal of Self-Government, 301, pp. 25–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mowbray, J. (2012). ‘Linguistic Justice: International Law and Language Policy’, Oxford University Press, 9780199646, pp. 1–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). ‘Language rights and linguistic justice in international law: Lost in translation?’, Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories, 1(1–2), pp. 37–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
‘Netflix to subtitle or dub in Catalan 70 titles per year’. (2022). Catalan News [Preprint]. Barcelona. Available at: [URL]
Nussbaum, M. (2003). ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’, Feminist Economics, pp. 33–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press,. JSTOR, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011) Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011b). Creating capabilities. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford Uni. Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palermo, F. and Woelk, J. (2003). ‘No representation without recognition: The right to political participation of (National) minorities’, Journal of European Integration, 25(3), pp. 225–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (2002). ‘Linguistic Justice’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1(1), pp. 59–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). ‘Linguistic Territoriality’, in Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford University Press, pp. 133–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2015). Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights, Equal Recognition. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peled, Y. (2018). ‘Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings’. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). ‘Toward an Adaptive Approach to Linguistic Justice : Three Paradoxes’, pp. 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peled, Y. and Bonotti, M. (2016). ‘Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness’, American Political Science Review, 110(4), pp. 798–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). ‘Sound reasoning: Why accent bias matters for democratic theory’, The Journal of Politics, 81(2), pp. 411–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piller, I. (2018). ‘Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics’, in. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piller, I. and Takahashi, K. (2011). ‘Linguistic diversity and social inclusion’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), pp. 371–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piller, I., Zhang, J. and Li, J. (2020). ‘Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic’, Multilingua, 39(5), pp. 503–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramallo, F. (2014). ‘Language policy and conflict management: A view from Galicia Policy and conflict’, in Language Policy and the Promotion of Peace: African and European Case Studies, pp. 93–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Réaume, D. G. (2003). ‘Beyond personality: the Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered’, in W. Kymlicka and A. Patten (eds) Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford Uni. Oxford, pp. 271–295.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). ‘Fairness and equal recognition’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(1), pp. 63–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, A. (2021). ‘Using YouTube as the Primary Transcription and Translation Platform for Remote Corpus Work’, Language Documentation and Conservation. University of Hawaii Press, pp. 514–550. Available at: [URL]
Robeyns, I. (2005). ‘Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement’, Social Indicators Research, 74(1), pp. 191–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayers, D. (2024). ‘Using language to help people, or using people to help language? A capabilities framework of language policy’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), pp. 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schutter, H. De. (2014). ‘Testing for linguistic injustice: territoriality and pluralism’, Nationalities Papers, 42(6), pp. 1034–1052. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2017). ‘Two principles of equal language recognition’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(1), pp. 75–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). ‘Intralinguistic justice’, in Y. Peled and D. M. Weinstock (eds) Language Ethics. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). ‘Linguistic justice for immigrants’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 418–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scrutton, A. P. (2017). ‘Epistemic Injustice and Mental Illness’, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, pp. 347–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985a). ‘Freedom and agency’, The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), pp. 203–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985b). ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), p. 169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). The standard of living: lecture I, concepts and critiques. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). ‘Development as capability expansion’, The community development reader, pp. 41–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). ‘Well-being, capability and public policy’, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 55(7/9), pp. 333–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shorten, A. (2017). ‘Four conceptions of linguistic disadvantage’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(7), pp. 607–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Justice in the Linguistic Environment: Narrow or Wide?. In: Gazzola, M., Templin, T., Wickström, BA. (eds) Language Policy and Linguistic Justice. Springer, Cham. pp. 153–176 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2006). ‘Language policy and linguistic human rights’, in T. Ricento (ed.) An introduction to language policy: Theory and Method. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 273–291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J. (1988). Minority education: From shame to struggle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. (2016). Language Rights (Critical Concepts in Language Studies). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timmermans, N. (2005). Council of Europe Publishing Editions du Conseil de l’Europe The status of sign languages in Europe. Strasbourg. Available at: [URL]
Ulasiuk, I. and Hadîrcă, L. (2018). ‘To Speak or Not to Speak: Minority Languages, the Public Administration and the Enforcement of Linguistic Requirements’, Language Policy and Conflict Prevention, pp. 40–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughan, D. (2022). ‘WEBINAR: The capability approach, linguistics, and language policy: resolving language-based social divisions in Sri Lanka | Human Development and Capability Association’. HDCA Asia-Pacific Regional Network.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vizard, P. and Burchardt, T. (2007). Developing a capability list: Final Recommendations of the Equalities Review Steering Group on Measurement. London. Available at: [URL]
Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R. (2019). Policy analysis : concepts and practice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woelk, J., Marko, J. and Palermo, F. (2007). Tolerance through law: self governance and group rights in South Tyrol. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yousef, J. and Agbaria, A. (2010). Israeli Government Policy and Civil Society Initiatives to Improve Arab Education in Israel Education on Hold. Haifa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gialdini, Cecilia
2025. Talking over the catastrophe. Language Problems and Language Planning DOI logo
Wickström, Bengt-Arne
2024. Approaching language rights and justice for linguistic minorities from the perspective of constitutional economics. Language Problems and Language Planning 48:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue