Article published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 45:1 (2021) ► pp.1–30
Bilingual students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language
A structural analysis
Published online: 12 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.20005.gan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.20005.gan
Abstract
This study investigates bilingual students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language, examining the structural models of the attitudes of Tibetan students and the differences in attitudes between living communities and as moderated by learning years (comparing Tibet-based and Han-based communities). The participants were 1,118 Tibetan students in the Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China. The results indicated the following: (i) the data supported the three components of attitude (Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral) in terms of bilingual students’ perception of the Tibetan language; (ii) the five lower-level domains of the attitudes toward the Tibetan language can be grouped into two categories – Cognitive (self-concept of the Tibetan language and social status) and Affective (friendliness, helpfulness, and identification) – and there is a causal relationship between them; and (iii) there are significant differences in attitudes toward the Tibetan language dependent on living community and learning year. Practical suggestions for educators in schools for bilingual students learning the Tibetan language are discussed.
ནང་དོན་གནད་བསྡུས། དཔྱད་རྩོམ་འདིའི་ནང་དུ་བོད་ཀྱི་སྐད་གཉིས་སློབ་མའི་བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་དང་འབྲེལ་བའི་ཁྱབ་ཁོངས་གཉིས་ལ་དཔྱད་བསྡུར་དང་།
སྒྲིག་གཞི་མཉམ་བྱའི་དཔེ་དབྱིབས་ཐོག་ནས་བོད་ཀྱི་སློབ་མའི་བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་ལ་བརྟག་དཔྱད་དང་བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་གྱི་སྤྱི་ཚོགས་ཁྱད་པར(བོད་པ་གཙོ་བོར་བྱེད་པའི་སྤྱི་ཚོག ས་དང་རྒྱ་མི་གཙོ་བོར་བྱེད་པའི་སྤྱི་ཚོགས།) གོ་བསྡུར་བྱེད་ཡོད་ཅིང་། དཔྱད་གཞི་འདིའི་ཞིབ་འཇུག་བྱ་ཡུལ་ནི་ཀྲུང་གོའི་དཀར་མཛེས་བོད་རིགས་རང་སྐྱོང་ཁུལ་གྱི་བོད་རིགས་སློབ་མ1118 པོ་ཡིན།ཞིབ་འཇུག་གི་གྲུབ་དོན་ནི་འདི་ལྟར་ཏེ། (1) ཞིབ་འཇུག་འདིའི་གྲངས་གཞི་ནི་སྐད་གཉིས་སློབ་མའི་བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་གྱི་གྲུབ་ཆ(ཤེས་པ་དང་བརྩེ་སེམས།སྤྱོད་པ) གསུམ་དང་མཐུན་ཞིང་། (2)བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་གྱི་རིམ་པ་ཅུང་དམའ་བའི་ཁྱབ་ཁོངས་ལྔ་པོ(བོད་སྐད་ཀྱི་བདག་དོན་དང་སྤྱི་ཚོགས་གོ་གནས། མཛའ་མཐུན་རང་བཞིན་དང་རོགས་སྐྱོར་རང་བཞིན། ཁས་ལེན་པ)ནི་ཤེས་པའི་རྣམ་གཞག་(བོད་སྐད་ཀྱི་བདག་དོན་དང་སྤྱི་ཚོགས་གོ་གནས) དང་བརྩེ་སེམས་ཀྱི་རྣམ་གཞག(མཛའ་མཐུན་རང་བཞིན་དང་རོགས་སྐྱོར་རང་བཞིན།ཁས་ལེན་པ) ཏུ་ཕྱོགས་བསྡོམས་བཟོ་ཆོག་པར་མ་ཟད།དེ་གཉིས་ཕན་ཚུན་བར་དུ་རྒྱུ་འབྲས་ཀྱི་འབྲེལ་བ་མཆིས། (3) བོད་སྐད་རྣམ་འགྱུར་ལ་འཚོ་བའི་སྤྱི་ཚོགས་དང་སློབ་སྦྱོང་ལོ་ཚད་ཐོག་ནས་དངོས་གསལ་གྱི་ཁྱད་པར་ལྡན། མཐར་སློབ་གྲྭའི་སློབ་གསོ་བ་དག་ལ་སྐད་གཉིས་སློབ་མའི་བོད་སྐད་ཆུ་ཚད་མཐོར་འདེགས་ཇི་ལྟར་བྱ་དགོས་མིན་སྐོར་ལ་ལག་ལེན་རུང་བའི་བསམ་འཆར་བཏོན་པ་བཅས་སོ། །
Resumo
La studo ekzamenas la vidpunktojn de dulingvaj studentoj rilate la tibetan, esplorante la strukturajn modelojn de la vidpunktoj de tibetaj studentoj kaj la vidpunktajn diferencojn inter vivokomunumoj laŭ jaroj de lernado (komparante tibete bazitajn kaj hane bazitajn komunumojn). La partoprenantoj estis 1118 tibetaj studentoj en la Tibeta Aŭtonoma Prefektolando Ganzi, de Ĉinio. La rezultoj indikis la jenon: (i) la donitaĵoj subtenis la tri elementojn de vidpunkto (Kogna, Afekta, Behaviora) rilate la perceptojn de dulingvaj studentoj pri la tibeta lingvo; (ii) la kvin pli malaltnivelaj domajnoj de la vidpunktoj al la tibeta lingvo estas grupigeblaj en du kategoriojn – Kogna (memkoncepto de la tibeta lingvo kaj socia statuso) kaj Afekta (amikemo, helpemo, kaj identigo) – kaj ekzistas kaŭza rilato inter ili; kaj (iii) ekzistas signifaj vidpunktaj diferencoj rilate la tibetan depende de vivokomunumo kaj lernojaro. Oni pridiskutas praktikajn sugestojn por edukistoj en lernejoj por dulingvaj studentoj kiuj lernas la tibetan.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Structure of attitudes toward Tibetan language
- 2.2Intergroup contact, community differences, and Tibetan students’ attitudes toward their mother tongue
- 2.3Learning year and its effect on students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language
- 3.Research method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Structural models for students’ attitudes toward Tibetan language
- 4.2Differences between communities in students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Structure of attitudes toward the Tibetan language
- 5.2Community differences influencing Tibetan language attitudes
- 5.3Chinese-Tibetan students’ attitudes toward the Tibetan language
- 6.Conclusions
References
References (79)
Bagozzi, R. P. & Burnkrant, R. E. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude–behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 371, 913–929.
Brubaker, B. L. (2003). Language attitudes and identity in Taiwan. Master Thesis of Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Pittsburgh.
Buenafuente, J. U. (2017). Evolution and determinants of language attitudes among Catalan adolescents. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 601, 92–103.
Cairancuo, Z., & Dou, X. (2014). “cáng zú xué shēng cáng hàn shuāng yǔ xué xí tài dù yán jiū ——yǐ qīng hǎi cáng zú zhōng xiǎo xué shēng wéi lì” [Tibetan students’ attitude toward Tibetan and Chinese bilingual learning taking Tibetan primary and secondary students in Qinghai as an example]. “zhōng guó mín zú jiāo yù” [National Education of China], 27(10), 28–33. [URL]
Chirkova, E. (2007). Between Tibetan and Chinese: Identity and language in Chinese SouthWest. Journal of South Asian Studies, 30 (3), 405–417.
Cooper, R. L., & Fishman, J. A. (1974). The study of language attitudes. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 31, 5–20.
Feifel, Karl-Eugen (1994). Language Attitudes in Taiwan: A Social Evaluation of Language in Social Change. Chinese Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
Ferguson, C. A. (1996). On sociolinguistically oriented language surveys. In Thom Huebner. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives: Papers on language in society, 1959–1994 (pp. 272–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gan, Y. T., Sude, Xie J. J., Cheng, L., Tan, Y. R., & Zhang, F. (2018). The Impact of Students’ Personal Characteristics on Tibetan Language Attitude and Acquisition: A survey of the Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province, China. Neuroquantology, 16(5), 76–83.
Golan-Cook, P. & Olshtain, E. (2011). A model of identity and language orientations: The case of immigrant students from the former soviet union in Israel. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 32(4), 361–376.
Gouleta, E. (2011). A bilingual education professional development project for primary Tibetan teachers in China: The experience and lessons learned. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 295–313.
Habók, A. & Magyar, A. (2017). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1–8.
Hoare, R. (2001). An integrative approach to language attitudes and identity in Brittany. Journal of Linguisti, 5(1), 73–84.
Hofer, T. (2017). Is lhasa Tibetan sign language emerging, endangered, or both? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2451, 113–145.
Jabbari, M. J. & Golkar, N. (2014). The relationship between EFL learners’ language learning attitudes and language learning strategies. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 161–163.
Kafandaris, S. (1985). Language and action–A structural model of behaviour. J Oper Res Soc, 361, 82–83.
Kind, P. M., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.
Khatib, M. & Rezaei, S. (2013). A model and questionnaire of language identity in Iran: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(7), 690–708.
Ladegaard, H. J. (2010). Language attitudes and sociolinguistic behaviour: Exploring attitude-behaviour relations in language. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 214–233.
Lapresta, C., Huguet, A., & Fernández-Costales, A. (2017). Language attitudes, family language and generational cohort in Catalonia: New contributions from a multivariate analysis. Language and Intercultural Communication, 171, 135–149.
Lasagabaster, D. (2017). Language learning motivation and language attitudes in multilingual Spain from an international perspective, Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 583–596.
Lauer, T. (2015). Between desire and duty: On Tibetan identity and its effects on second-generation Tibetans. Asian Ethnology, 74(1), 167–192.
Li, Yongbin. (2007). A discussion on Tibetan language subconscious emotion – – an analysis of attitudes toward Tibetan and Chinese language in Lhasa. Journal of Tibet University, 20(4), 87–91. [URL]
. (2007). Attitudes towards Chinese and Tibetan languages including the role of subconscious emotion. China Tibet: English version, 7 (2), 57–62. [URL]
. (2007a). A discussion on Tibetan language subconscious emotion – an analysis of attitudes toward Tibetan and Chinese language in Lhasa. Journal of Tibet University, 20(4), 87–91. [URL]
. (2007b). Attitudes towards Chinese and Tibetan languages including the role of subconscious emotion. China Tibet: English version, 7 (2), 57–62. [URL]
Lohr, J. M. & Staats, A. W. (1973). Attitude conditioning in Sino-Tibetan languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 196–200.
Long, H. (2017). A study of problems and responses in the development of dual-language education models in Tibetan regions: Taking Xiahe county in Gannan Tibetan autonomous prefecture as an example. Chinese Education and Society, 50(1), 33–41.
Ma, F. & Renzeng. (2015). Ethnolinguistic vitality, language attitudes and language education in Tibetan schools in Qinghai. In Feng, A., & Adamson, B. (Eds), Trilingualism in education in China: Models and challenges (pp. 103–115). Multilingual Education, 121. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, M. (2015). Associations between language learners’ spiritual intelligence, foreign language attitude and achievement motivation: A structural equation approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 4(1), 38–54. [URL]
McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Aron, A., Wright, S. C., & Reis, H. T. (2001). Interactions social intergroup and Intergroup prejudice: Quantity versus quality. New York: Stony Brook University, Stony Brook.
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1991). Authority in Language: Investigating language prescription and standardization. London and New York: Routledge.
Nguyen, T. T. T. & Hamid, M. O. (2016). Language attitudes, identity and l1 maintenance: A qualitative study of Vietnamese ethnic minority students. System, 611, 87–97.
Nima, B. (2001). Problems related to bilingual education in Tibet. Chinese Education and Society, 34(2), 91–102.
Oroujlou, N. & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Tibetan languages, 29(1), 994–1000.
Osam, N. (2006). Turkish Cypriot women and their attitudes towards foreign words: A case of language loyalty. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1811, 57–67.
Peters, S. (2014). Gyalthang Southern Khams Tibetan: A case study of language attitudes and shift in Shangri-la. Anthós, 6(1), 111–136.
Phuntsog, N. (2017). Tibetan language at home in the diaspora: The mother tongue–based bilingual schooling of Tibetans in India. Diaspora Indigenous and Minority Education, 12(1), 1–13.
Postiglione, G. & Jiao, B. (2007). Language in Tibetan education: The case of the Neidiban Manlaji. In Feng, A. (Ed.), Bilingual education in China:Practices,policies and concepts (pp. 49–74). Clevedon, Buffalo: Multilingual Maters.
Postiglione, G., Jiao, B., & Gyatso, S. (2005). Education in rural Tibet: Development, problems and adaptations. China: An International Journal, 3(1), 1–23.
Reid, N. (2006). Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 3–27.
Rezaei, S., Latifi, A., & Nematzadeh, A. (2017). Attitude towards Azeri language in Iran: A large-scale survey research. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 931–941.
Rodgers, E. (2017). Towards a typology of discourse-based approaches to language attitudes. Language and Communication, 561, 82–94.
Roche, G. (2015). The Tibetanization of Henan’s Mongols: Ethnicity and assimilation on the sino-Tibetan frontier. Asian Ethnicity, 17(1), 1–22.
Roche, G. & Suzuki, H. (2018). Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies.
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., & Sebastian, R. J. (1982). An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In E. B. Ryan, & H. Giles. (Eds.), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied context (pp. 1–19). London: Arnold.
Sargent, T., Kong, P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Home environment and educational transitions on the path to college in rural Northwest China. International Journal of Educational Development, 341, 98–109.
Schueler-Meyer, A. (2017). Formation of language identities in a bilingual teaching intervention on fractions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13 (7b), 4211–4236.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Cummins, J. (1988). Minority Education: From Shame to Struggle. Clevedon, Philadepgia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Stria, I. (2017). Language attitudes among Esperanto speakers. Język, Komunikacja,Informacja, 121, 146–158.
Sude. (2016). A summary of the research on Bilingual Education of ethnic minorities. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (EDUCATION Tibetan language EDITION), 17 (11), 1–6.
Swift, J. S., Jonathan, A., & Smith, W. (1977). Attitudes to Language Learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 16(7), 7–16.
Tang, C., Zhong, L., & Cheng, S. (2012). Tibetan attitudes towards community participation and ecotourism. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 3(1), 8–15.
Tannenbaum, M. & Cohen, H. (2017). Language educational policy in the service of group identity: The Habad case. Language Policy, 11, 1–24.
To, Siu-Ming (2015). Development and validation of a quantitative measure for Chinese sources of parental meaning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3580–3594.
Tournadre, N. (2014). The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith and Nathan, W. H. (Eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area (pp. 105–129). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Tódor, E. & Dégi, Z. (2017). Language attitudes, language learning experiences and individual strategies what does school offer and what does it lack? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Philologica, 8(2), 123–137.
Tunik, T., Sude & Yuan, M.(2016).“hā sà kè zú zhōng xiǎo xué shēng shuāng yǔ tài dù ,shuāng yǔ néng lì yǐ jí shuāng yǔ shǐ yòng qíng kuàng de diào chá yán jiū” [Research on bilingual attitude, bilingual ability and bilingual use of Kazak primary and secondary students] . “dāng dài jiāo yù yǔ wén huà” [Contemporary Education and Culture],8(3): 88-95..
Wan, M. (1997). An Investigation on the bilingual Tibetans’ attitude toward their native language and Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 12(03), 294–300. [URL]
Wang, H. (2015). Current situation and Reflection on language use of adolescents in areas with declining ethnic languages: A case study of Tibetan students in Tianzhu County. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Social Science Edition), 51, 86–91.
Wang, H., Chao, X., & Sun, S. N. (2019). Tibetan students at an interior university in China: Negotiating identity, language, and power. Asia Pacific Journal of Education.
Wright, S. C. & Bougie, E. (2007). Intergroup contact and minority-language education : Reducing language-based discrimination and its negative impact. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 261, 157–181.
Wright, S. C. & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Identity and the language in the classroom: Investigating the impact of heritage versus second language instruction on personal and collective self-esteem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 871, 241–252.
Yan, X. (2017). A study of Macao tertiary students’ language attitudes after the handover. Language Awareness, 26(1), 1–16.
Yao, C. (2015). The language life in a Tibetan village community with globalization: Case study on language use and attitude in Lijia Village, Huangnan, Qinhai. Sinología Hispánica, 17(1), 133–144.
Yao, C. & Zuckermann, G. (2016). Language vitality and language identity – which one is more important? Tibetan-Chinese bilingual education in Maketang versus Huazangsi. Language Problems and Language Planning, 40(2), 163–186.
Yi, Xilamucuo. (2015). Becoming bilingual in school and home in Tibetan areas of China: Stories of struggle. PhD. thesis of School of Education, University of Leeds.
Yuan, Y., Xia, N., Xia, B., et al.(2018). “yún nán dí qìng cáng qū sān yǔ jiāo yù yǔ yán tài dù shí zhèng yán jiū yǔ qǐ shì”[An empirical study on language attitude of trilingual education in Diqing Tibetan area of Yunnan Province] . “wài guó yǔ wén lùn cóng dì” [Symposium on foreign languages],81.[URL]
Zenz, A. (2008). ‘Tibetanness’ under threat? Neo-integrationism, minority education and career strategies in Qinghai, P.R. China. Leiden, Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
Zhang, J. & Pérez-Milans, M. (2018). Structures of feeling in language policy: The case of Tibetan in China. Language Policy, 18(1), 1–26.
Zhang, X. (2014). Language attitude of Tibetan students in Ganzi Tibetan area: A case study of Kangding Tibetan middle school. Chinese Journal, 171, 36–37.
Zhang, L. B. & Tsung, L. T. H. (2019). Tibetan bilingual education in Qinghai: Government policy vs family language practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(3), 290–302.
