Cover not available

Discussion published In: Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp.312–317

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Debate / Debate / Debatte / Debato

“Rejoinder” to Robert Phillipson, Languages in public policy, and constraints in academia

 | CEPII, CREST, CEPR, Heriot-Watt University
Published online: 3 December 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00047.mel
Article outline
  • Consider first the scientific world
  • Consider next world trade
  • References
References (7)
References
British Chambers of Commerce (2003–2004). The BBC Language Survey. The Impact of Foreign Languages on British Business – Part 11, 2003; Part 21, 2004 (online, Web publication).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dearing, R. (2006). ‘The Dearing Report to the Secretary of State for Education & Skills’, The Languages Review, [URL]
Feely, A. & Winslow, D. (2005). Talking sense. A Research Study of Language Skills Management in Major Companies (London: CILT, The National Center for Languages).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English (London: British Council).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mélitz, J. (2016). “English as a global language” in V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber, eds., The Palgrave handbook of economics and language,” Chapter 20 (pp.583–615) Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuffield Foundation (2000). Languages: the next generation; the final report and recom-mendations of the Nuffield Languages Inquiry (online).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varis, T. (1984). ‘The international flow of television programs’, Journal of Communication, 341, pp. 143–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue